Individual Tree Mortality Model for Slash Pine in Florida: A Mixed Modeling Approach

2012 ◽  
Vol 36 (4) ◽  
pp. 211-219 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nilesh Timilsina ◽  
Christina L. Staudhammer
2005 ◽  
Vol 20 (2) ◽  
pp. 101-109 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hailemariam Temesgen ◽  
Stephen J. Mitchell

Abstract An individual-tree mortality model was developed for major tree species in complex stands (multi-cohort, multiaged, and mixed species) of southeastern British Columbia (BC), Canada. Data for 29,773 trees were obtained from permanent sample plots established in BC. Average annual diameter increment and mortality rates ranged from 0.08 to 0.17 cm/year and from 0.3 to 2.6%, respectively. Approximately 70% of the trees were used for model development and 30% for model evaluation. After evaluating the model, all 29,773 trees were used to fit the final model. A generalized logistic model was used to relate mortality to tree size, competition, and relative position of trees in a stand. The evaluation test demonstrated that the model appears to be well behaved and robust for the tree species considered in this study. For the eight tree species, the average deviation between observed and predicted annual mortality rates varied from −0.5 to 0.7% in the test data. West. J. Appl. For. 20(2):101–109.


1990 ◽  
Vol 20 (8) ◽  
pp. 1212-1218 ◽  
Author(s):  
David A. Hamilton Jr.

Limits are frequently encountered in the range of values of independent variables included in data sets used to develop individual tree mortality models. If the resulting model is to be utilized, its ability to extrapolate to conditions outside these limits must be evaluated. This paper describes the development and evaluation of six assumptions required to extend the range of applicability of an individual tree mortality model previously described. The assumptions deal with mortality in very dense stands, mortality for very small trees, mortality on habitat types and regions poorly represented in the data, and mortality for species poorly represented in the data.


2003 ◽  
Vol 163 (3) ◽  
pp. 209-222 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yuqing Yang ◽  
Stephen J Titus ◽  
Shongming Huang

2020 ◽  
Vol 113 (4) ◽  
pp. 1858-1863 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gabriel G Foote ◽  
Christopher J Fettig ◽  
Darrell W Ross ◽  
Justin B Runyon ◽  
Tom W Coleman ◽  
...  

Abstract Douglas-fir, Pseudotsuga menziesii (Mirb.) Franco, trees and stands can be protected from Douglas-fir beetle, Dendroctonus pseudotsugae Hopkins (DFB)-caused mortality by application of synthetic formulations of the beetle’s antiaggregation pheromone, 3-methylcyclohex-2-en-1-one (MCH). A biodegradable formulation of MCH, SPLAT MCH, was developed and evaluated for protecting individual Douglas-fir trees and small stands from colonization and mortality by DFB. In an individual-tree experiment in Idaho, both MCH bubble capsules and SPLAT MCH significantly reduced the proportion of treated trees colonized and killed by DFB compared to untreated controls. SPLAT MCH was as effective as MCH bubble capsules for protecting individual trees. Both MCH bubble capsules and SPLAT MCH significantly reduced the proportion of trees colonized and killed by DFB within 0.04-ha circular plots surrounding each treated tree compared to untreated controls. In 0.41 ha stands in New Mexico, both MCH bubble capsules and SPLAT MCH significantly reduced the proportion of trees colonized and killed by DFB compared to untreated controls, again with no differences observed between MCH treatments. In a similar stand level trial in Idaho, neither MCH treatment significantly reduced the proportion of trees colonized by DFB, and only MCH bubble capsules significantly reduced levels of tree mortality compared to untreated controls, but no significant difference was observed between SPLAT MCH and MCH bubble capsules. Overall, the results indicate that SPLAT MCH is as effective as MCH bubble capsules for protecting individual trees and small stands of Douglas-fir from DFB-caused mortality.


1989 ◽  
Vol 13 (2) ◽  
pp. 76-80 ◽  
Author(s):  
Robert L. Bailey ◽  
Thomas M. Burgan ◽  
Eric J. Jokela

Abstract Data from 263 plots in a regional fertilization study of midrotation-aged slash pine plantations were used to fit prediction equations for basal area, trees per acre, stand average dominant height, diameter distributions, and individual tree heights. The equations include N and P fertilizationrates and CRIFF soil groups as predictor variables. The survival model also accounts for the accelerating effect of fusiform rust on mortality rate. Using published tree volume equations, the prediction of volumes by dbh class for fertilized slash pine plantations is now possible. This integratedsystem of equations is available as a user-friendly computer program that can calculate expected yields by diameter class and aid the forester in evaluating investment opportunities that include forest fertilization. South. J. Appl. For. 13(2):76-80.


1989 ◽  
Vol 13 (1) ◽  
pp. 51-56 ◽  
Author(s):  
G. R. Hodge ◽  
T. L. White ◽  
G. L. Powell ◽  
S. M. De Souza

Abstract Gains over unimproved seed for progeny from first generation--un-rogued, first generation--rogued, and one and one-half generation orchards of slash pine (Pinus elliottii var. elliottii) for individual tree volume at 15 years are predicted to be 10%, 15%, and 19%, respectively. Rustinfection of orchard progeny on sites where unimproved material incurs 50% infection are predicted to be 49%, 41%, and 35% for the three orchard types. Using a growth and yield model that incorporates fusiform rust, gains in individual tree volume and increased rust resistance were combinedto estimate effects on per acre yields. Percent volume per acre gains are predicted to be 7.0%, 13.2%, and 18.0% for the three orchard types. Collection and deployment of the most rust resistant seed to high rust hazard sites raises the gain on these sites and becomes increasingly beneficialas the rust hazard increases. South. J. Appl. For. 13(1): 51-56.


2019 ◽  
Vol 30 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Maxime Cailleret ◽  
Nicolas Bircher ◽  
Florian Hartig ◽  
Lisa Hülsmann ◽  
Harald Bugmann

2013 ◽  
Vol 59 (1) ◽  
pp. 27-37 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nilesh Timilsina ◽  
Christina L. Staudhammer

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document