Relationship of leaf water content with photosynthesis and soil water content in summer maize

2018 ◽  
Vol 38 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
冯晓钰 FENG Xiaoyu ◽  
周广胜 ZHOU Guangsheng
1989 ◽  
Vol 69 (2) ◽  
pp. 513-519 ◽  
Author(s):  
P. G. JEFFERSON ◽  
D. A. JOHNSON ◽  
K. H. ASAY

Studies were conducted to compare the effect of glaucousness on the response of perennial range grasses to drought stress. Glaucous and nonglaucous plants of an intermediate wheatgrass hybrid (Thinopyrum intermedium (Host) Barkworth and D. R. Dewey × T. intermedium-acutum D.R. Dewey pers. commun.) and an interspecific hybrid of crested wheatgrass (induced tetraploid Agropyron cristatum (L.) Gaertner s. lat. × A. desertorum (Fisch. ex Link) Schultes) were studied in field nurseries for epicuticular wax production, leaf water potential, leaf reflectance of radiation and leaf temperature. Glaucous plants of intermediate wheatgrass had higher epicuticular wax production, increased leaf reflection of radiation, lower midday canopy temperatures, and higher predawn leaf water potentials than non-glaucous plants. Similar trends were observed for the crested wheatgrass hybrids except that glaucousness did not affect midday plant temperatures. A greenhouse experiment involved comparison of glaucous and non-glaucous synthetics of Altai wild ryegrass (Leymus angustus (Trin.) Pilger Dewey). Leaves of glaucous Altai wild ryegrass reflected more radiation and used water less efficiently (total biomass basis) at high soil water content than leaves of the nonglaucous synthetic. At low soil water content, glaucous Altai wild ryegrass had higher leaf temperature and higher midday leaf water potential. Glaucous and nonglaucous Altai synthetics did not differ significantly for shoot yield, total biomass yield, and water use efficiency (shoot yield basis) at either soil water content. While glaucousness may affect water relations of these grasses, it does not necessarily affect forage yield.Key words: Water use efficiency, drought stress, leaf radiation reflectance, crested wheatgrass, intermediate wheatgrass, Altai wild ryegrass


1984 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
pp. 31-35 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. M. Bennett ◽  
K. J. Boote ◽  
L. C. Hammond

Abstract Limited data exist describing the physiological responses of peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.) plants to tissue water deficits. Detailed field experiments which accurately define the water status of both the plant and soil are required to better understand the effects of water stress on a peanut crop. The objectives of the present study were 1) to describe the changes in leaf water potential components during a drying cycle, and 2) to define the relationships among soil water content, leaf water potential, leaf turgor potential, relative water content, leaf-air temperature differential, and leaf diffusive resistance as water stress was imposed on a peanut crop. During a 28-day drying period where both rainfall and irrigation were withheld from peanut plants, midday measurements of the physiological parameters and volumetric soil water contents were taken concurrently. As soil drying progressed, water extraction from the upper soil depths was limited as soil moisture approached 0.04 m3m-3. Leaf water potentials and leaf turgor potentials of nonirrigated plants decreased to approximately −2.0 and 0 MPa, respectively, by the end of the experimental period. Leaf water potentials declined only gradually as the average volumetric soil water content in the upper 90 cm of soil decreased from 0.12 to 0.04 m3m-3. Further reductions in soil water content caused large reductions in leaf water potential. As volumetric soil moisture content decreased slightly below 0.04 m3m-3 in the upper 90 cm, leaf relative water content dropped to 86%, leaf water potential approached −1.6 MPa and leaf turgor potential decreased to 0 MPa. Concurrently, stomatal closure resulted and leaf temperature increased above air temperature. Osmotic potentials measured at 100% relative water content were similar for irrigated and nonirrigated plants, suggesting little or no osmotic regulation.


1988 ◽  
Vol 28 (2) ◽  
pp. 249 ◽  
Author(s):  
S Fukai ◽  
P Inthapan

Several physiological responses were compared, under irrigated and water-stressed conditions, in an attempt to explain the reasons for the greater reduction in dry matter production of rice compared with maize and sorghum in a water-limiting environment. Leaf water potential and leaf rolling were determined weekly, soil water profiles and root length density twice, and leaf osmotic potential once during a long dry period. Root length density of rice was at least as high as that of maize and sorghum in the top 0.6 m layer of soil in both the wet and dry trials. There was no difference in water extraction among the 3 species from this layer, while rice extracted less water than did the other species from below 0.6 m. High variability among replicates precluded any conclusion being drawn regarding root length in the deeper layer. Leaf water potential, measured in the early afternoon, was consistently lower in rice than in maize and sorghum, even when soil water content was high, indicating high internal resistance to the flow of water in the rice plants. The low leaf water potential in rice was accompanied by low osmotic potential, and this assisted in maintenance of turgor and dry matter growth when soil water content was relatively high. As soil water content decreased, however, leaf water potential became very low (less than - 2.5 MPa) and, for rice, leaves rolled tightly.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document