Avoiding Moral Cynicism

2001 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
pp. 1-17
Author(s):  
Bernard Gert ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Moral Cynicism

The Role of Neighborhood Context in the Relationship between Parenting Effectiveness and Self-control

2020 ◽  
pp. 001112872095143
Author(s):  
Brian J. Stults ◽  
Nic Swagar
Keyword(s):  
Collective Efficacy ◽  
Small Body ◽  
Large Body ◽  
Neighborhood Context ◽  
Self Control ◽  
Family Characteristics ◽  
Neighborhood Characteristics ◽  
Moral Cynicism ◽  
Low Self Control

A large body of work has examined the factors contributing to low self-control among adolescents, with a predominant focus on individual and family characteristics. More recently, a small body of research has examined whether neighborhood characteristics influence self-control, with many finding null effects. We extend this research by considering whether neighborhood characteristics have a moderating influence rather than a direct effect. We examine several neighborhood characteristics, including collective efficacy, delinquency rate, and moral cynicism, as well as distinctive components of parenting effectiveness, including warmth, lack of hostility, and supervision. We find that neighborhoods do influence levels of self-control among juveniles, but primarily by helping or hindering the efforts of effective parents to instill self-control in their children.

scholarly journals Rethinking the Purity of Moral Motives in Business: Kant Against Moral Purism

2019 ◽  
Vol 167 (3) ◽  
pp. 379-393
Author(s):  
Wim Dubbink ◽  
Luc van Liedekerke
Keyword(s):  
Transcendental Philosophy ◽  
Business World ◽  
Business People ◽  
Moral World ◽  
Self Interest ◽  
Common Strategy ◽  
The Common ◽  
Moral Cynicism ◽  
Moral Motive ◽  
The Way

AbstractMoral purism is a commonly held view on moral worthiness and how to identify it in concrete cases. Moral purists long for a moral world in which (business) people—at least sometimes—act morally worthy, but in concrete cases they systematically discount good deeds as grounded in self-interest. Moral purism evokes moral cynicism. Moral cynicism is a problem, both in society at large and the business world. Moral cynicism can be fought by refuting moral purism. This article takes issue with moral purism. The common strategy to tackle moral purism is to reject the exclusion thesis which states that self-interest and the ‘pure’ moral motive (and thus moral worthiness) exclude each other. We develop a different strategy. We argue that moral purists are mistaken in the way they judge moral worthiness in concrete cases. They employ the wrong procedure and the wrong criteria. We develop a proper procedure and proper criteria. We build on Kant, who we argue is unfairly regarded as the champion of moral purism. In order to see how Kant can develop a consistent (non-purist) philosophy, the exclusion thesis must be embedded in Kant’s transcendental philosophy. Properly embedded, Kant turns out to be both anti-purist and anti-cynical.

Aristotle’s Reform of Paideia

1998 ◽  
pp. 32-37
Author(s):  
Evelyn M. Barker
Keyword(s):  
Practical Wisdom ◽  
Public Debate ◽  
Ancient Greek ◽  
Art And Science ◽  
Middle Term ◽  
Contemporary View ◽  
Moral Cynicism ◽  
Forms Of Knowledge

Ancient Greek education featured the pedagogical exercise of dialectic, in which a student defended a thesis against rigorous questioning by an instructor. Aristophanes’ Clouds, as well as Plato and Aristotle, criticize the practice for promoting intellectual skepticism, moral cynicism, and an eristic spirit - the desire to win in argument rather than seek the truth. I suggest Aristotle’s logic is meant to reform the practice of dialectic. In the first part of my paper, I defend the thesis that Aristotle’s syllogistic is an art of substantive reasoning against the contemporary view that it is a science of abstract argument forms. First, I show that Aristotle’s exclusive distinction between art and science makes syllogistic a techne for the higher forms of knowledge, science and practical wisdom. Then I argue that Aristotle’s treatment of demonstrative and dialectical syllogisms provides rigorous standards for reasoning in science and public debate. In particular I discuss a) the requirement that a demonstration use verifiable premises whose middle term points out a cause for the predicate applying to the conclusion; b) how his analysis of valid syllogisms with a "wholly or partly false" universal premise applies to dialectical syllogisms.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document