Abduction, Imagination, and Science
Keyword(s):
In this essay, I argue that developments in Alvin Plantinga’s evolutionary argument against naturalism—specifically, Thomas Crisp’s argument against a naturalistic metaphysics—have likely undermined the project of science for naturalists who are scientific realists. Scientific theorizing requires the use of abductive reasoning. A central component of abductive reasoning is the use of one’s imagination. However, Crisp’s argument provides us reason to doubt the trustworthiness of our cognitive faculties as it relates to the imaginative abilities necessary for complex abductive reasoning.
1994 ◽
Vol 24
(4)
◽
pp. 527-539
◽
2019 ◽
Vol 25
(35)
◽
pp. 3751-3761
◽
2018 ◽
Vol 18
(15)
◽
pp. 799-820
Keyword(s):
Keyword(s):