John Haugeland, Dasein Disclosed

2014 ◽  
Vol 4 ◽  
pp. 86-95
Author(s):  
Hans Pedersen ◽  
Keyword(s):  
John Haugeland

The Pittsburgh Kantians: Brandom, Conant, Haugeland, and McDowell on Kant

2021 ◽  
pp. 1-32
Author(s):  
Jacob Browning
Keyword(s):  
Shared Reading ◽  
Contemporary Philosophy ◽  
John Mcdowell ◽  
Important Distinction ◽  
University Of Pittsburgh ◽  
Transcendental Deduction ◽  
The World ◽  
Novel Reading ◽  
John Haugeland ◽  
The University

Abstract Over the last thirty years, a group of philosophers associated with the University of Pittsburgh—Robert Brandom, James Conant, John Haugeland, and John McDowell—have developed a novel reading of Kant. Their interest turns on Kant’s problem of objective purport: how can my thoughts be about the world? This paper summarizes the shared reading of Kant’s Transcendental Deduction by these four philosophers and how it solves the problem of objective purport. But I also show these philosophers radically diverge in how they view Kant’s relevance for contemporary philosophy. I highlight an important distinction between those that hold a quietist response to Kant, evident in Conant and McDowell, and those that hold a constructive response, evident in Brandom and Haugeland. The upshot is that the Pittsburgh Kantians have a distinctive approach to Kant, but also radically different responses to his problem of objective purport.

John Haugeland: Dasein Disclosed (ed. Joseph Rouse)

2014 ◽  
Vol 47 (3-4) ◽  
pp. 465-472
Author(s):  
William Britt
Keyword(s):  
John Haugeland

scholarly journals Zed Adams und Jacob Browning (Hg.): Giving a Damn. Essays in Dialogue with John Haugeland

2017 ◽  
Vol 5 (3) ◽  
pp. 33-42
Author(s):  
Karl Kraatz
Keyword(s):  
John Haugeland

Besprechung von Zed Adams und Jacob Browning (Hg.): Giving a Damn. Essays in Dialogue with John Haugeland. Cambridge, Massachusetts, London: The MIT Press 2016.

scholarly journals Constancy Mechanisms and the Normativity of Perception

Giving a Damn ◽  
2017 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chauncey Maher
Keyword(s):  
Perceptual Representation ◽  
Rule Following ◽  
John Haugeland ◽  
Wide Swath

In “Truth and Rule-Following,” John Haugeland criticizes a wide swath of competing accounts of perceptual representation on the grounds that they cannot make room for the possibility of perceptual states that are functionally right but factually wrong. In this paper, we spell out what we take Haugeland’s criticism to involve by showing how it applies equally well to an account of perceptual representation that was published after Haugeland’s death: namely, the account of perceptual representation offered in Tyler Burge’s Origins of Objectivity (2010).

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document