The Modal Square of Opposition and the Mental Models Theory

2020 ◽  
Vol 57 (3) ◽  
pp. 75-86
Author(s):  
Miguel Lopez-Astorga ◽  

The mental models theory is a current approach trying to account for human thought and hence communication by highlighting the action of semantics and ignoring, to a large extent, syntax. However, it has been argued that the theory actually contains an underlying syntax related to any kind of modal logic. This paper delves into this last idea and is intended to show that the concepts of possibility and necessity as understood in it fulfill the basic requirement that, according to Fitting and Mendelsohn, every modal logic has to meet: to satisfy the relationships provided by the Aristotelian modal square of opposition.

SATS ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 18 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Miguel López-Astorga

AbstractDrawing on the theory of ‘mental models’, I have previously shown that the valid syllogisms in the Aristotelian logical system, including all of its figures and moods, are very easy for the human mind. Indeed, they can even be used to predict inferences that people can make with quantified sentences. In this paper, I further argue that, if mental models theory is correct, then also the Aristotelian conversion rules are not hard for the human mind. My account here again focuses on the distinction made by the mental models theory between canonical and noncanonical models.


PsycCRITIQUES ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 5858 (5050) ◽  
Author(s):  
Erica J. Gannon ◽  
Mike Martin
Keyword(s):  

2007 ◽  
Author(s):  
Cristina Vargas ◽  
Sergio Moreno-Rios ◽  
Candida Castro ◽  
Geoffrey Underwood

2019 ◽  
Vol 0 (1) ◽  
pp. 7-17
Author(s):  
V. O. Palamarchuk ◽  
O. A. Tovkai ◽  
V. V. Voitenko ◽  
O. V. Mazur ◽  
O. P. Nechay

2006 ◽  
Vol 29 (6) ◽  
pp. 156-158 ◽  
Author(s):  
Geoffrey K Isbister

Author(s):  
Miguel López-Astorga

There is a kind of logical theses that can be a cognitive problem. They are theses that are not tautologies and people tend to accept as absolutely correct. This is the case of theses such as those of Aristotle and Boethius. This paper tries to give an explanation of the reasons why this happens. The explanation is based on the theory of mental models. However, it also resorts to modal logic and the account of the ideas presented by Lenzen. Thus, relating the general framework of the theory of mental models to basic aspects of modal logic and this last account, a possible solution of the problem is proposed.


Heart ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 103 (22) ◽  
pp. 1770-1779 ◽  
Author(s):  
Domenico D’Amario ◽  
Antonio Amodeo ◽  
Rachele Adorisio ◽  
Francesco Danilo Tiziano ◽  
Antonio Maria Leone ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document