scholarly journals Quo Vadis Open data?

2018 ◽  
Vol 12 (2) ◽  
pp. 179-220
Author(s):  
Jozef Andraško ◽  
Matúš Mesarčík
Keyword(s):  
Public Sector ◽  
Data Protection ◽  
New Technologies ◽  
Open Data ◽  
Legal Order ◽  
Free Access ◽  
Access To Information ◽  
European Union Law ◽  
Public Sector Information ◽  
Quo Vadis

New technologies have irreversibly changed the nature of the traditional way of exercising the right to free access to information. In the current information society, the information available to public authorities is not just a tool for controlling the public administration and increasing its transparency. Information has become an asset that individuals and legal entities also seek to use for business purposes. PSI particularly in form of open data create new opportunities for developing and improving the performance of public administration.In that regard, authors analyze the term open data and its legal framework from the perspective of European Union law, Slovak legal order and Czech legal order. Furthermore, authors focus is on the relation between open data regime, public sector information re-use regime and free access to information regime.New data protection regime represented by General Data Protection Regulation poses several challenges when it comes to processing of public sector information in form of open data. The article highlights the most important challenges of new regime being compliance with purpose specification, selection of legal ground and other important issues.

Datos abiertos y reutilización en el contexto de la Estrategia europea de datos

Tábula ◽  
2021 ◽  
pp. 201-213
Author(s):  
Julián Valero Torrijos
Keyword(s):  
European Union ◽  
Public Sector ◽  
Open Data ◽  
Regulatory Framework ◽  
Open Government ◽  
The European Union ◽  
Public Sector Information ◽  
Significant Process ◽  
Datos Abiertos

En los últimos años hemos asistido a un importante proceso de modernización tecnológica en España que ha afectado a las Administraciones Públicas. Más allá de las limitaciones en la regulación, en este proceso se percibe la importancia de los datos en general y de los datos abiertos en particular como uno de los ejes principales para reforzar las exigencias y principios del Gobierno Abierto. En esta ponencia se pretende analizar la evolución del marco normativo aplicable en España y ponerlo en relación con las recientes iniciativas que está impulsando la Unión Europea para promocionar la reutilización de la información del sector público y los datos abiertos. In the last few years we have witnessed a significant process of technological modernisation in Spain that has impacted on Public Administrations. Beyond the limitations in the regulation, in this process the importance of data and open data particularly is perceived as one of the main axes to strengthen the requirements and principles of Open Government. This lecture aims to analyse the evolution of the regulatory framework applicable in Spain and to connect it with the recent initiatives being promoted by the European Union to foster the reuse of public sector information and open data.

Introducing Key Elements Regarding Access to Personal Data for Scientific Research in the Perspective of Developing Innovative Medicines

2020 ◽  
Vol 27 (3) ◽  
pp. 195-212
Author(s):  
Jean Herveg ◽  
Annagrazia Altavilla
Keyword(s):  
Data Protection ◽  
Open Data ◽  
Scientific Research ◽  
Personal Data ◽  
Private Life ◽  
Fundamental Rights ◽  
Future Research ◽  
General Data Protection Regulation ◽  
Public Sector Information ◽  
General Data

Abstract This article aims at opening discussions and promoting future research about key elements that should be taken into account when considering new ways to organise access to personal data for scientific research in the perspective of developing innovative medicines. It provides an overview of these key elements: the different ways of accessing data, the theory of the essential facilities, the Regulation on the Free Flow of Non-personal Data, the Directive on Open Data and the re-use of public sector information, and the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) rules on accessing personal data for scientific research. In the perspective of fostering research, promoting innovative medicines, and having all the raw data centralised in big databases localised in Europe, we suggest to further investigate the possibility to find acceptable and balanced solutions with complete respect of fundamental rights, as well as for private life and data protection.

e-Exclusion and Bot Rights: Legal aspects of the robots exclusion standard for public agencies and other public sector bodies with Swedish examples

First Monday ◽  
2007 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nicklas Lundblad
Keyword(s):  
Public Sector ◽  
Legal Aspects ◽  
Public Access ◽  
Access To Information ◽  
Public Agencies ◽  
Legal Problems ◽  
Public Sector Information

Public sector use of the robot exclusion standard raises interesting questions about transparency, availability of public sector information and the principle of public access to information. This paper explores both actual examples of how public sector agencies in Sweden use the standard and an analysis of the legal problems related to use of the standard.

Developing a Digital Welfare State: Data Protection and the Use of Automated Decision-Making in the Public Sector across Six EU Countries

2020 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Marta Choroszewicz ◽  
Beata Mäihäniemi
Keyword(s):  
Decision Making ◽  
Public Sector ◽  
The Netherlands ◽  
Welfare State ◽  
Data Protection ◽  
New Technologies ◽  
General Data Protection Regulation ◽  
The Public ◽  
General Data ◽  
Automated Decision Making

This article uses the sociolegal perspective to address current problems surrounding data protection and the experimental use of automated decision-making systems. This article outlines and discusses the hard laws regarding national adaptations of the European General Data Protection Regulation and other regulations as well as the use of automated decision-making in the public sector in six European countries (Denmark, Sweden, Germany, Finland, France, and the Netherlands). Despite its limitations, the General Data Protection Regulation has impacted the geopolitics of the global data market by empowering citizens and data protection authorities to voice their complaints and conduct investigations regarding data breaches. We draw on the Esping-Andersen welfare state typology to advance our understanding of the different approaches of states to citizens’ data protection and data use for automated decision-making between countries in the Nordic regime and the Conservative-Corporatist regime. Our study clearly indicates a need for additional legislation regarding the use of citizens’ data for automated decision-making and regulation of automated decision-making. Our results also indicate that legislation in Finland, Sweden, and Denmark draws upon the mutual trust between public administrations and citizens and thus offers only general guarantees regarding the use of citizens’ data. In contrast, Germany, France, and the Netherlands have enacted a combination of general and sectoral regulations to protect and restrict citizens’ rights. We also identify some problematic national policy responses to the General Data Protection Regulation that empower governments and related institutions to make citizens accountable to states’ stricter obligations and tougher sanctions. The article contributes to the discussion on the current phase of the developing digital welfare state in Europe and the role of new technologies (i.e., automated decision-making) in this phase. We argue that states and public institutions should play a central role in strengthening the social norms associated with data privacy and protection as well as citizens’ right to social security.

scholarly journals Editorial JeDEM 8(1) 2016

2016 ◽  
Vol 8 (1) ◽  
pp. i-iv
Author(s):  
Noella Edelmann ◽  
Johann Höchtl ◽  
Judith Schossboeck
Keyword(s):  
Public Sector ◽  
Open Data ◽  
Open Government ◽  
Public Sector Information

This summer issue of JeDEM presents the most recent “ongoing submissions” to the Journal of E-Democracy and Open Government. The authors have not submitted to a particular call for papers, but have responded to the journal’s open invitation to submit a paper to JeDEM’s main topics. The papers in this issue analyse current strengths and weaknesses in Open Data, Public Sector Information (PSI) and E-Government, present results, suggest methodologies as well as ideas for yet more research and work in these areas. 

scholarly journals Open Data Strategies and Experiences to Improve Sharing and Publication of Public Sector Information

2014 ◽  
Vol 6 (1) ◽  
pp. 80-86 ◽  
Author(s):  
Laura María Gutiérrez Medina
Keyword(s):  
Economic Development ◽  
Public Sector ◽  
Data Quality ◽  
Canary Islands ◽  
Open Data ◽  
Public Institutions ◽  
The Public ◽  
Tourism Sector ◽  
Public Sector Information

The Canary Islands receive 10 million tourists every year. Tourism represents a key sector for economic development in the Canaries. This work presents the benefits of open data usages in the tourism sector both in municipalities and in the island government. These public institutions have valuable information that should be shared with other institutions: 600 hotels and apartments, 10,000 bars and restaurants, and more than 15,000 retail businesses. This article describes an open data project to validate and to publish such data across multiple administrations. The main benefits for the public sector are the improvement of the data quality and the interoperability between different administrations.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document