scholarly journals Is Bedside Ultrasound a Reliable Method for Detecting Soft Tissue Foreign Bodies in Upper Extremity Penetrating Trauma Patients?

2014 ◽  
Vol 2 (4) ◽  
Author(s):  
Ehsan Bolvardi ◽  
Masoud Pezeshki Rad ◽  
Bita Abbasi ◽  
Reza Akhavan
Keyword(s):  
Soft Tissue ◽  
Upper Extremity ◽  
Reliable Method ◽  
Foreign Bodies ◽  
Penetrating Trauma ◽  
Bedside Ultrasound ◽  
Trauma Patients

Extremity Trauma: Foreign Bodies and Vascular Injury

2015 ◽  
Author(s):  
David A. Meguerdichian ◽  
John Eicken
Keyword(s):  
Foreign Body ◽  
Vascular Injury ◽  
Foreign Bodies ◽  
Significant Proportion ◽  
Ankle Brachial Index ◽  
Penetrating Trauma ◽  
Trauma Patients ◽  
Peripheral Vasculature ◽  
Extremity Trauma ◽  
Upper And Lower Extremities

It is important for physicians to be mindful of the possibility of a foreign body in the context of extremity trauma. Patients with foreign bodies may not suspect their presence, and a significant proportion of foreign bodies are missed by the initial treating physician. Trauma injuries to the peripheral vasculature can be divided into blunt and penetrating trauma, and can also be classified as occlusive or nonocclusive injuries. This review details the assessment and stabilization, diagnosis, treatment and disposition, and outcomes for patients with foreign body and vascular injuries. Figures show beside ultrasonography using a linear ray probe that demonstrates a foreign body wood splinter in soft tissue, the major arteries of the upper and lower extremities, and measurement of the ankle-brachial index in an injured limb with suspected vascular injury. Tables list supplies needed to perform bedside ultrasound-guided foreign body removal, steps to remove a foreign body under ultrasound guidance, hard and soft signs of arterial injuries, and high-risk orthopedic injuries and their commonly associated vascular injury. This review contains 4 figures, 4 tables, and 51 references.

Bedside Ultrasound for the Detection of Soft Tissue Foreign Bodies: A Cadaveric Study

2009 ◽  
Vol 36 (4) ◽  
pp. 377-380 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chad S. Crystal ◽  
David A. Masneri ◽  
John S. Hellums ◽  
David W. Kaylor ◽  
Scott E. Young ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Soft Tissue ◽  
Foreign Bodies ◽  
Cadaveric Study ◽  
Bedside Ultrasound

The Utility of Bedside Ultrasound for the Detection of Soft Tissue Foreign Bodies in the Emergency Department

2005 ◽  
Vol 46 (3) ◽  
pp. 79 ◽  
Author(s):  
D.W. Kaylor ◽  
C.S. Crystal ◽  
T.P. Coon ◽  
M.A. Miller ◽  
C.G. Skinner ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Emergency Department ◽  
Soft Tissue ◽  
Foreign Bodies ◽  
Bedside Ultrasound

The Utility of Bedside Ultrasound and Patient Perception in Detecting Soft Tissue Foreign Bodies in Children

2005 ◽  
Vol 21 (8) ◽  
pp. 487-492 ◽  
Author(s):  
David I. Friedman ◽  
Rene J. Forti ◽  
Stephen P. Wall ◽  
Ellen F. Crain
Keyword(s):  
Soft Tissue ◽  
Foreign Bodies ◽  
Patient Perception ◽  
Bedside Ultrasound

Written Prescription for Over-the-Counter Nonopioid Pain Medications Does Not Increase the Likelihood of Use after Ambulatory Hand and Upper Extremity Surgery

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Daniel J. Lynch ◽  
James S. Lin ◽  
Kanu S. Goyal
Keyword(s):  
Postoperative Pain ◽  
Soft Tissue ◽  
Upper Extremity ◽  
Pain Control ◽  
Control Program ◽  
Postoperative Pain Control ◽  
Over The Counter ◽  
Unequal Variance ◽  
Pain Medications ◽  
Medication Consumption

Abstract Introduction This study looked to determine how providing written prescriptions of nonopioids affected postoperative pain medication usage and pain control. Materials and Methods Patients undergoing hand and upper-extremity surgery (n = 244) were recruited after the implementation of a postoperative pain control program encouraging nonopioids before opioids. Patients were grouped based on procedure type: bone (n = 66) or soft tissue (n = 178). Patients reported postoperative medication consumption and pain control scores. Two-tailed t-tests assuming unequal variance were performed to look for differences in postoperative pain control and medication consumption between those who were and were not given written prescriptions for nonopioids. Results For both soft tissue and bone procedure patients, a written prescription did not significantly affect patients’ postoperative pain control or medication consumption. Regardless of receiving a written prescription, patients who underwent soft tissue procedures consumed significantly more daily nonopioids than opioids. Conclusion Receiving written prescriptions for nonopioids may not have a significant effect on postoperative pain control or medication consumption. Patients undergoing soft tissue hand and upper extremity procedures may be more likely to consume more daily nonopioids than opioids postoperatively compared to bone procedure patients regardless of whether they receive a written prescription for nonopioids.

Versatility of the Posterior Interosseous Artery Flap: Emphasis on Powering Up the Toe Transfer

Hand ◽  
2021 ◽  
pp. 155894472110289
Author(s):  
GiJun Lee ◽  
BumSik Kim ◽  
Neunghan Jeon ◽  
JungSoo Yoon ◽  
Ki Yong Hong ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Soft Tissue ◽  
Upper Extremity ◽  
Reverse Flow ◽  
Donor Site ◽  
Congenital Defects ◽  
Soft Tissue Coverage ◽  
Posterior Interosseous Artery ◽  
Arterial Inflow ◽  
Pedicle Length ◽  
Interosseous Artery

Background: Reverse-flow posterior interosseous artery (rPIA) flap is an excellent tool for restoration of defects in the hand and upper extremity, sparing the main arteries to the hand. Its reliability has been well established. Materials and Methods: Fifty-one cases of rPIA flap involving 49 patients were retrospectively reviewed. The inclusion criteria were age, sex, etiology, size and location of the defect, flap size, number of perforators included, pedicle length, flap inset, donor site coverage, complications, and ancillary procedures. Results: This study included 44 men and 5 women, ranging in age between 10 and 73 years. The subjects had soft tissue defects of the hand and upper extremity mainly due to traumatic injuries, including scar contractures of the first web space in 18 cases, thumb amputations in 6 cases, and congenital defects in 1 case. Among the 51 rPIA flap elevations, 3 cases involved flap failure due to the absence of proper pedicle. A fasciocutaneous pattern was observed in 45 cases and a myocutaneous pattern in 3 cases. In 5 cases of unplantable thumb amputations, the rPIA flap was performed for arterial inflow to the secondary toe-to-thumb transfer. Venous congestion of varying degrees was noted in 7 cases involving partial necrosis in 2 cases. During the mean 17 months of follow-up, patients were generally satisfied with the final outcomes. Conclusion: The rPIA flap can be used not only for soft tissue coverage of the hand and upper extremity but also as a recipient arterial pedicle for a secondary toe-to thumb transfer.

scholarly journals Evidence for use of damage control surgery and damage control interventions in civilian trauma patients: a systematic review

2021 ◽  
Vol 16 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Derek J. Roberts ◽  
◽  
Niklas Bobrovitz ◽  
David A. Zygun ◽  
Andrew W. Kirkpatrick ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Damage Control ◽  
Penetrating Trauma ◽  
Damage Control Surgery ◽  
Trauma Patients ◽  
Clinical Scenario ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Iliac Vessel ◽  
Civilian Trauma ◽  
Definitive Surgery

Abstract Background Although damage control (DC) surgery is widely assumed to reduce mortality in critically injured patients, survivors often suffer substantial morbidity, suggesting that it should only be used when indicated. The purpose of this systematic review was to determine which indications for DC have evidence that they are reliable and/or valid (and therefore in which clinical situations evidence supports use of DC or that DC improves outcomes). Methods We searched 11 databases (1950–April 1, 2019) for studies that enrolled exclusively civilian trauma patients and reported data on the reliability (consistency of surgical decisions in a given clinical scenario) or content (surgeons would perform DC in that clinical scenario or the indication predicted use of DC in practice), construct (were associated with poor outcomes), or criterion (were associated with improved outcomes when DC was conducted instead of definitive surgery) validity for suggested indications for DC surgery or DC interventions. Results Among 34,979 citations identified, we included 36 cohort studies and three cross-sectional surveys in the systematic review. Of the 59 unique indications for DC identified, 10 had evidence of content validity [e.g., a major abdominal vascular injury or a packed red blood cell (PRBC) volume exceeding the critical administration threshold], nine had evidence of construct validity (e.g., unstable patients with combined abdominal vascular and pancreas gunshot injuries or an iliac vessel injury and intraoperative acidosis), and six had evidence of criterion validity (e.g., penetrating trauma patients requiring > 10 U PRBCs with an abdominal vascular and multiple abdominal visceral injuries or intraoperative hypothermia, acidosis, or coagulopathy). No studies evaluated the reliability of indications. Conclusions Few indications for DC surgery or DC interventions have evidence supporting that they are reliable and/or valid. DC should be used with respect for the uncertainty regarding its effectiveness, and only in circumstances where definitive surgery cannot be entertained.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document