A Meta-Analysis of the Effects and Safety of Pulmonary Surfactants Combined with Budesonide in Bronchopulmonary Dysplasia

2020 ◽  
Vol 22 (6) ◽  
Author(s):  
Bing-Bin He ◽  
Guo-Sheng Liu ◽  
Jia-Yong Zhuang ◽  
Bo-Ran Ye
Keyword(s):  
Bronchopulmonary Dysplasia ◽  
Assessment Tool ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Ductus Arteriosus ◽  
Intratracheal Instillation ◽  
Knowledge Network ◽  
Cochrane Library ◽  
Pulmonary Surfactants ◽  
Increased Risk ◽  
Related Mortality

Context: The purpose of this analysis was to explore the effects and safety of Pulmonary Surfactants (PS) combined with budesonide in Bronchopulmonary Dysplasia (BPD) by a meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials (RCTs). Evidence acquisition: Literature searches were performed in PubMed, the Cochrane Library, EMBASE, the China Knowledge Network, and the Wanfang database to collect data from RCTs. The primary outcomes were BPD incidence and BPD-related mortality, while the secondary outcomes were BPD-related complications. Bias was evaluated by the Cochrane risk assessment tool. The RevMan 5.3 software was used for the meta-analysis, and the Egger’s test was used for publication bias assessment. Results: A total of 720 subjects were enrolled from six RCTs, including 352 in the experimental group and 368 in the observation group. The BPD incidence (RR = 0. 42, 95% CI [0. 37, 0. 89], P < 0.001) and BPD-related mortality (RR = 0.54, 95% CI [0.38, 0.89], P < 0.05) differed significantly between the two groups. Significant differences were also found in intraventricular hemorrhage, infection/sepsis, Retinopathy of Prematurity (ROP), and Patent Ductus Arteriosus (PDA). There were no significant differences in the incidence of PDA, Neonatal Necrotizing Enterocolitis (NEC), hyperglycemia, and hypertension. Conclusions: The intratracheal instillation of pulmonary surfactants with budesonide can reduce the incidence of BPD and BPD-related mortality with no increased risk of short-term complications.

scholarly journals Meta-analysis of the efficacy of pulmonary surfactants combined with budesonide for the prevention of bronchopulmonary dysplasia

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bingbin He ◽  
Jiayong Zhuang ◽  
Boran Ye ◽  
Guosheng Liu
Keyword(s):  
Bronchopulmonary Dysplasia ◽  
Treatment Plan ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Ductus Arteriosus ◽  
Intratracheal Instillation ◽  
Knowledge Network ◽  
Pulmonary Surfactants ◽  
Increased Risk ◽  
The Impact ◽  
Related Mortality

Abstract Background Pulmonary surfactants(PS) combined with the intratracheal instillation of budesonide to prevent bronchopulmonary dysplasia (BPD) have been report previously. However, the safety of the use of PS combined with budesonide is still unknown and remains to be clarified. Methods PubMed, the CochraneLibrary, EMBASE, the China Knowledge Network and the Wanfang database were searched for relevant studies. Searches were performed from December 2018, and data from randomized controlled trials (RCTs) were collected. Primary outcome measures were BPD incidence, BPD-related mortality. Secondary outcomes were BPD-related complications. The Cochrane risk assessment tool was used for the evaluation of bias. RevMan5. 3software was employed for meta-analysis. An Egger's test was used for publication bias assessments. Results A total of 720 subjects were enrolled from 6 RCTs, including 352 in the experimental group and 368 in the observation group. A meta-analysis showed that the incidence of BPD [RR=0. 42, 95% CI (0. 37, 0. 89), P < 0.001] and BPD-related mortality [RR = 0.54, 95% CI (0.38, 0.89), P<0.05] significantly differed between the groups. Differences were also observed for intraventricular hemorrhage, infection/sepsis, retinopathy of prematurity (ROP), and patent ductus arteriosus. There were no significant differences in the incidence of PDA, neonatal necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC), hyperglycemia, or hypertension (P > 0.05). Conclusion The intratracheal instillation of pulmonary surfactants with budesonide can reduce the incidence of BPD and BPD-related mortality, with no increased risk of short-term complications. However, considering both sample size and study bias, the safety and efficacy of this treatment plan requires clarification in large-samples, and multi-center clinical RCTs. In addition, the impact of long-term complications such as neurodevelopmental disorders requires further assessment.

scholarly journals Epidural-Related Fever and Maternal and Neonatal Morbidity: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Neonatology ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 117 (3) ◽  
pp. 259-270 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sophie Jansen ◽  
Enrico Lopriore ◽  
Christiana Naaktgeboren ◽  
Marieke Sueters ◽  
Jacqueline Limpens ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Cohort Studies ◽  
Antibiotic Treatment ◽  
Assessment Tool ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Cochrane Library ◽  
Increased Risk ◽  
Observational Cohort ◽  
Meta Analyses ◽  
The Impact

<b><i>Background:</i></b> While epidural analgesia (EA) is associated with maternal fever during labor, the impact on the risk for maternal and/or neonatal sepsis is unknown. <b><i>Objectives:</i></b> The aim of this systematic review was to investigate the effect of epidural-related intrapartum fever on maternal and neonatal outcomes. <b><i>Methods:</i></b> OVID MEDLINE, OVID Embase, the Cochrane Library, Cochrane Controlled Register of Trials, and clinical trial registries were searched for randomized controlled trials (RCT) and observational cohort studies from inception to November 2018. A total of 761 studies were identified with 100 eligible for full-text review. Only articles investigating the relationship between EA and maternal fever during labor were eligible for inclusion. Study quality was assessed using the Cochrane’s Risk of Bias tool and National Institute of Health Quality Assessment Tool. Two meta-analyses – one each for the RCT and observational cohort groups – were performed using the random-effects model of Mantel-Haenszel to produce summary risk ratios (RR) with 95% CI. <b><i>Results:</i></b> Twelve RCTs and 16 observational cohort studies involving 579,157 parturients were included. RRs for maternal fever for the RCT and cohort analyses were 3.54 (95% CI 2.61–4.81) and 5.60 (95% CI 4.50–6.97), respectively. Meta-analyses of RR for maternal infection in both groups were infeasible given few occurrences. Meta-analysis of data from observational studies showed an increased risk for maternal antibiotic treatment in the epidural group (RR 2.60; 95% CI 1.31–5.17). For both analyses, neonates born to women with an epidural were not evaluated more often for suspected sepsis. Neither analysis reported an increased rate of neonatal bacteremia or neonatal antibiotic treatment after EA, although data precluded conclusiveness. <b><i>Conclusion:</i></b> EA increases the risk of intrapartum fever and maternal antibiotic treatment. However, a definite conclusion on whether EA increases the risk for a proven maternal and/or neonatal bacteremia cannot be drawn due to the low quality of data. Further research on whether epidural-related intrapartum fever is of infectious origin or not is therefore needed.

scholarly journals Frailty as a Predictor for Mortality Among Patients With COVID-19: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xiaoming Zhang ◽  
Jing Jiao ◽  
Jing Cao ◽  
Xiao-Peng Huo ◽  
Chen Zhu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Subgroup Analysis ◽  
Assessment Tool ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Frailty Index ◽  
Relevant Literature ◽  
Nursing Home Residents ◽  
Cochrane Library ◽  
Early Screening ◽  
Clinical Frailty Scale ◽  
Increased Risk

Abstract BackgroundA great number of studies have explored the association between frailty and mortality among COVID-19 patients, suggesting inconsistent results. The aim of this meta-analysis was to synthesize the evidence on this issue. MethodsThree databases, including PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library from inception to 20th October, 2020 were conducted to search for relevant literature. The Newcastle–Ottawa Scale (NOS) was used to assess quality bias, and STATA was employed to pool the effect size. Additionally, potential publication bias and sensitivity analysis was performed.ResultsThere are 11 studies that were included, with a total of 22105 COVID-19 patients for quantitative analysis. Overall, the pooled prevalence of frailty was 51% (95%CI:42%-60%). Patients infected with COVID-19 with frailty had an increased risk of mortality, compared to those without frailty, and the pooled HR was 2.27 (95%CI:1.79-2.89). In addition, subgroup analysis based on population showed that the pooled HR for hospitalized patients and nursing home residents was 2.24 (95%CI:1.74-2.89) and 2.95 (95%CI:1.19-7.32), respectively. Subgroup analysis using the frailty assessment tool indicated that this association still existed when using the clinical frailty scale (CFS)(HR=2.41;95%CI:1.60-3.62), frailty index(HR=2.95;95%CI:1.19-7.32), hospital frailty risk score (HR=1.96;95%CI:1.79-2.15) and palliative performance scale (HR= 2.89;95%CI:1.42-5.87). ConclusionOur study indicates that frailty was an independent predictor for mortality among patients with COVID-19. Thus, frailty could be a prognostic factor for clinicians to stratify high-risk groups, and remind doctors and nurses to perform early screening and corresponding interventions urgently needed to reduce mortality rates in patients infected by SARS-CoV-2.

scholarly journals Efficacy and safety of PDE5 inhibitors in the treatment of diabetes mellitus erectile dysfunction: a systematic review and meta-analysis

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xiao Li ◽  
Qi Zhao ◽  
Jingshang Wang ◽  
Jisheng Wang ◽  
Hengheng Dai ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Diabetes Mellitus ◽  
Erectile Dysfunction ◽  
Erectile Function ◽  
Assessment Tool ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Knowledge Network ◽  
Cochrane Library ◽  
Efficacy And Safety ◽  
Pde5 Inhibitors ◽  
Data Resource

Abstract ABSTRACT Background: To systematically evaluate the efficacy and safety of the PDE5 inhibitors in patients with diabetes mellitus erectile dysfunction (DMED). Methods:Random control trials (RCTs) in PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane library, ClinicalTrials, China Knowledge Network (CNKI), Weipu Chinese Science and Technology Journal Full-text Database (VIP), Wanfang Data Resource System (WANFANG) were searched. Two researchers independently screened the literature, extracted the data and checked the results, and used the risk assessment tool to conduct a methodological quality assessment, and finally conducted a meta-analysis. The primary outcome, the erectile function scores of the International Index of Erectile Dysfunction (IIEF-EF), was recorded, while secondary outcomes (IIEF-Q3, IIEF-Q4, SEP 2 and 3, GAQ) and safety outcomes also needed attention. Results: Twelve studies included 3,124 patients and six PDE5 inhibitors were included. Compared with placebo, PDE5 inhibitors significantly improved male erectile function in IIEF-EF (WMD = 5.73; 95% CI: 3.62 to 7.84), IIEF-Q3 (WMD = 1.14; 95% CI: 0.87 to 1.40), IIEF-Q4 (WMD=1.28; 95% CI: 1.04 to 1.51), SEP2 (WMD=21.24; 95% CI: 15.50 to 26.98), SEP3 (WMD=25.77; 95% CI: 18.78 to 32.77), GAQ (RR) =2.98; 95% CI: 2.06 to 4.32), and with the safety (WMD=5.73; 95% CI: 3.62 to 7.84). Conclusions: PDE5 inhibitors can significantly improve the patient's erectile function, but cannot ignore their side effects.

scholarly journals Frailty as a predictor of mortality among patients with COVID-19: a systematic review and meta-analysis

2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Xiao-Ming Zhang ◽  
Jing Jiao ◽  
Jing Cao ◽  
Xiao-Peng Huo ◽  
Chen Zhu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Subgroup Analysis ◽  
Assessment Tool ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Relevant Literature ◽  
Nursing Home Residents ◽  
Sensitivity Analyses ◽  
Cochrane Library ◽  
Early Screening ◽  
Clinical Frailty Scale ◽  
Increased Risk

Abstract Background A large number of studies have explored the association between frailty and mortality among COVID-19 patients, with inconsistent results. The aim of this meta-analysis was to synthesize the evidence on this issue. Methods Three databases, PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library, from inception to 20th January 2021 were searched for relevant literature. The Newcastle–Ottawa Scale (NOS) was used to assess quality bias, and STATA was employed to pool the effect size by a random effects model. Additionally, potential publication bias and sensitivity analyses were performed. Results Fifteen studies were included, with a total of 23,944 COVID-19 patients, for quantitative analysis. Overall, the pooled prevalence of frailty was 51% (95% CI: 44–59%). Patients with frailty who were infected with COVID-19 had an increased risk of mortality compared to those without frailty, and the pooled hazard ratio (HR) and odds ratio (OR) were 1.99 (95% CI: 1.66–2.38) and 2.48 (95% CI: 1.78–3.46), respectively. In addition, subgroup analysis based on population showed that the pooled ORs for hospitalized patients in eight studies and nursing home residents in two studies were 2.62 (95% CI: 1.68–4.07) and 2.09 (95% CI: 1.40–3.11), respectively. Subgroup analysis using the frailty assessment tool indicated that this association still existed when using the clinical frailty scale (CFS) (assessed in 6 studies, pooled OR = 2.88, 95% CI: 1.52–5.45; assessed in 5 studies, pooled HR = 1.99, 95% CI: 1.66–2.38) and other frailty tools (assessed in 4 studies, pooled OR = 1.98, 95% CI: 1.81–2.16). In addition, these significant positive associations still existed in the subgroup analysis based on study design and geographic region. Conclusion Our study indicates that frailty is an independent predictor of mortality among patients with COVID-19. Thus, frailty could be a prognostic factor for clinicians to stratify high-risk groups and remind doctors and nurses to perform early screening and corresponding interventions urgently needed to reduce mortality rates in patients infected by SARS-CoV-2.

Comparative Efficacy and Safety of Duration of Dual Antiplatelet Therapy in Patients with CAD Undergoing Drug-eluting Stent Implantation: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-analysis

2020 ◽  
Vol 26 (44) ◽  
pp. 5739-5745
Author(s):  
Jieqiong Guan ◽  
Wenjing Song ◽  
Pan He ◽  
Siyu Fan ◽  
Hong Zhi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Antiplatelet Therapy ◽  
Major Bleeding ◽  
Dual Antiplatelet Therapy ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Cochrane Library ◽  
Drug Eluting Stent ◽  
Efficacy And Safety ◽  
Risk Of Bleeding ◽  
Increased Risk ◽  
Drug Eluting

Objective: The aim was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of duration of dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT) for patients who received percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with a drug-eluting stent. Background: The optimal duration of DAPT to balance the risk of ischemia and bleeding in CAD patients undergoing drug-eluting stent (DES) implantation remains controversial. Methods: PubMed, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, Clinicaltrials.gov, CNKI and Wanfang Databases were searched for randomized controlled trials of comparing different durations of DAPT after DES implantation. Primary outcomes were major adverse cardiac and cerebrovascular events (MACCE), and major bleeding, and were pooled by Bayes network meta-analysis. Net adverse clinical and cerebral events were used to estimate the surface under the cumulative ranking (SUCRA) curves. The subgroup analysis based on clinical status, follow-up and area was conducted using traditional pairwise meta-analysis. Results: A total of nineteen trials (n=51,035) were included, involving six duration strategies. The network metaanalysis showed that T2 (<6-month DAPT followed by aspirin, HR:1.51, 95%CI:1.02-2.22), T3 (standard 6-month DAPT, HR:1.47, 95%CI:1.14-1.91), T4 (standard 12-month DAPT, HR:1.41, 95%CI:1.15-1.75) and T5 (18-24 months DAPT, HR:1.47, 95%CI:1.09-1.97) was associated with significantly increased risk of MACCE compared to T6 (>24-month DAPT). However, no significant difference was found in MACCE risk between T1 (<6-month DAPT followed by P2Y12 monotherapy) and T6. Moreover, T5 was associated with significantly increased risk of bleeding compared to T1(RR:3.94, 95%CI:1.66-10.60), T2(RR:3.65, 95%CI:1.32-9.97), T3(RR:1.93, 95%CI:1.21-3.50) and T4(RR:1.89, 95%CI:1.15-3.30). The cumulative probabilities showed that T6(85.0%), T1(78.3%) and T4(44.5%) were the most efficacious treatment compared to the other durations. In the ACS (<50%) subgroup, T1 was observed to significantly reduce the risk of major bleeding compared to T4, but not in the ACS (≥50%) subgroup. Conclusions: Compared with other durations, short DAPT followed by P2Y12 inhibitor monotherapy showed non-inferiority, with a lower risk of bleeding and not associated with an increased MACCE. In addition, the risk of major bleeding increased significantly, starting with DAPT for 18-month. Compared with the short-term treatment, patients with ACS with the standard 12-month treatment have a better prognosis, including lower bleeding rate and the decreased risk of MACCE. Due to study's limitations, the results should be verified in different risk populations.

Psychological interventions as an alternative and add-on to antidepressant medication to prevent depressive relapse: systematic review and meta-analysis

2020 ◽  
pp. 1-8
Author(s):  
Josefien Johanna Froukje Breedvelt ◽  
Maria Elisabeth Brouwer ◽  
Mathias Harrer ◽  
Maria Semkovska ◽  
David Daniel Ebert ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Psychological Intervention ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Antidepressant Medication ◽  
Cochrane Library ◽  
Psychological Interventions ◽  
Relapse Risk ◽  
Increased Risk ◽  
Antidepressant Use ◽  
Randomised Controlled ◽  
Risk Of Relapse

Background After remission, antidepressants are often taken long term to prevent depressive relapse or recurrence. Whether psychological interventions can be a viable alternative or addition to antidepressants remains unclear. Aims To compare the effectiveness of psychological interventions as an alternative (including delivered when tapering antidepressants) or addition to antidepressants alone for preventing depressive relapse. Method Embase, PubMed, the Cochrane Library and PsycINFO were searched from inception until 13 October 2019. Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) with previously depressed patients in (partial) remission where preventive psychological interventions with or without antidepressants (including tapering) were compared with antidepressant control were included. Data were extracted independently from published trials. A random-effects meta-analysis on time to relapse (hazard ratio, HR) and risk of relapse (risk ratio, RR) at the last point of follow-up was conducted. PROSPERO ID: CRD42017055301. Results Among 11 included trials (n = 1559), we did not observe an increased risk of relapse for participants receiving a psychological intervention while tapering antidepressants versus antidepressants alone (RR = 1.02, 95% CI 0.84–1.25; P = 0.85). Psychological interventions added to antidepressants significantly reduced the risk of relapse (RR = 0.85, 95% CI 0.74–0.97; P = 0.01) compared with antidepressants alone. Conclusions This study found no evidence to suggest that adding a psychological intervention to tapering increases the risk of relapse when compared with antidepressants alone. Adding a psychological intervention to antidepressant use reduces relapse risk significantly versus antidepressants alone. As neither strategy is routinely implemented these findings are relevant for patients, clinicians and guideline developers.

scholarly journals EXPRESS: Stroke risk following traumatic brain injury: systematic review and meta-analysis

2021 ◽  
pp. 174749302110042
Author(s):  
Grace Mary Turner ◽  
Christel McMullan ◽  
Olalekan Lee Aiyegbusi ◽  
Danai Bem ◽  
Tom Marshall ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Stroke Risk ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Vitamin K Antagonists ◽  
Cochrane Library ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Large Sample Size ◽  
Hazard Ratios ◽  
Increased Risk ◽  
The Cochrane Library

Aims To investigate the association between TBI and stroke risk. Summary of review We undertook a systematic review of MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL, and The Cochrane Library from inception to 4th December 2020. We used random-effects meta-analysis to pool hazard ratios (HR) for studies which reported stroke risk post-TBI compared to controls. Searches identified 10,501 records; 58 full texts were assessed for eligibility and 18 met the inclusion criteria. The review included a large sample size of 2,606,379 participants from four countries. Six studies included a non-TBI control group, all found TBI patients had significantly increased risk of stroke compared to controls (pooled HR 1.86; 95% CI 1.46-2.37). Findings suggest stroke risk may be highest in the first four months post-TBI, but remains significant up to five years post-TBI. TBI appears to be associated with increased stroke risk regardless of severity or subtype of TBI. There was some evidence to suggest an association between reduced stroke risk post-TBI and Vitamin K antagonists and statins, but increased stroke risk with certain classes of antidepressants. Conclusion TBI is an independent risk factor for stroke, regardless of TBI severity or type. Post-TBI review and management of risk factors for stroke may be warranted.

scholarly journals Association of dyslipidemia with the severity and mortality of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19): a meta-analysis

2021 ◽  
Vol 18 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Yanli Liu ◽  
Yilong Pan ◽  
Yuyao Yin ◽  
Wenhao Chen ◽  
Xiaodong Li
Keyword(s):  
Fixed Effects ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Cochrane Library ◽  
Case Control Studies ◽  
Risk Of Death ◽  
Potential Association ◽  
Increased Risk ◽  
Language Restriction ◽  
Newcastle Ottawa Scale

Abstract Background The numbers of confirmed cases of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) and COVID-19 related deaths are still increasing, so it is very important to determine the risk factors of COVID-19. Dyslipidemia is a common complication in patients with COVID-19, but the association of dyslipidemia with the severity and mortality of COVID-19 is still unclear. The aim of this study is to analyze the potential association of dyslipidemia with the severity and mortality of COVID-19. Methods We searched the PubMed, Embase, MEDLINE, and Cochrane Library databases for all relevant studies up to August 24, 2020. All the articles published were retrieved without language restriction. All analysis was performed using Stata 13.1 software and Mantel–Haenszel formula with fixed effects models was used to compare the differences between studies. The Newcastle Ottawa scale was used to assess the quality of the included studies. Results Twenty-eight studies involving 12,995 COVID-19 patients were included in the meta-analysis, which was consisted of 26 cohort studies and 2 case–control studies. Dyslipidemia was associated with the severity of COVID-19 (odds ratio [OR] = 1.27, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.11–1.44, P = 0.038, I2 = 39.8%). Further, patients with dyslipidemia had a 2.13-fold increased risk of death compared to patients without dyslipidemia (95% CI 1.84–2.47, P = 0.001, I2 = 66.4%). Conclusions The results proved that dyslipidemia is associated with increased severity and mortality of COVID-19. Therefore, we should monitor blood lipids and administer active treatments in COVID-19 patients with dyslipidemia to reduce the severity and mortality.

Executive functions in children with heart disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis

2021 ◽  
pp. 1-9
Author(s):  
William M. Jackson ◽  
Nicholas Davis ◽  
Johanna Calderon ◽  
Jennifer J. Lee ◽  
Nicole Feirsen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Executive Functions ◽  
Data Extraction ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Executive Dysfunction ◽  
Cochrane Library ◽  
Planning Problem ◽  
Healthy Controls ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Increased Risk

Abstract Context: People with CHD are at increased risk for executive functioning deficits. Meta-analyses of these measures in CHD patients compared to healthy controls have not been reported. Objective: To examine differences in executive functions in individuals with CHD compared to healthy controls. Data sources: We performed a systematic review of publications from 1 January, 1986 to 15 June, 2020 indexed in PubMed, CINAHL, EMBASE, PsycInfo, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library. Study selection: Inclusion criteria were (1) studies containing at least one executive function measure; (2) participants were over the age of three. Data extraction: Data extraction and quality assessment were performed independently by two authors. We used a shifting unit-of-analysis approach and pooled data using a random effects model. Results: The search yielded 61,217 results. Twenty-eight studies met criteria. A total of 7789 people with CHD were compared with 8187 healthy controls. We found the following standardised mean differences: −0.628 (−0.726, −0.531) for cognitive flexibility and set shifting, −0.469 (−0.606, −0.333) for inhibition, −0.369 (−0.466, −0.273) for working memory, −0.334 (−0.546, −0.121) for planning/problem solving, −0.361 (−0.576, −0.147) for summary measures, and −0.444 (−0.614, −0.274) for reporter-based measures (p < 0.001). Limitations: Our analysis consisted of cross-sectional and observational studies. We could not quantify the effect of collinearity. Conclusions: Individuals with CHD appear to have at least moderate deficits in executive functions. Given the growing population of people with CHD, more attention should be devoted to identifying executive dysfunction in this vulnerable group.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document