scholarly journals Self-Esteem in Children and Adolescents with Growth Hormone Deficiency

2018 ◽  
Vol In Press (In Press) ◽  
Author(s):  
Héla Ayadi ◽  
Leila Cherif ◽  
Imen Hadjkacem ◽  
Wiem Kammoun ◽  
Khaoula Khemakhem ◽  
...  
2021 ◽  
Vol 66 (6) ◽  
pp. 50-58
Author(s):  
A. V. Vitebskaya ◽  
E. A. Pisareva ◽  
A. V. Popovich

BACKGROUND: Diagnostics of growth hormone deficiency (GHD) and secondary adrenal insufficiency (SAI) is based on estimation of peak GH and cortisol concentrations in provocation tests. Russian consensus on diagnostics and treatment of hypopituitarism in children and adolescences recommends to measure GH and cortisol concentrations in every time-point of insulin test (IT). Glucagon test (GT) is discussed in literature as alternative to IT.AIMS: To estimate the possibility to use provocation GT for diagnostics of SAI and GHD in children and adolescents.MATERIALS AND METHODS: We investigated blood and urine cortisol levels, IT, and GT in 20 patients 6.5–17.8 years (Me 13.0 (10.4; 15.3)) after surgery and/or radiology and/or chemical therapy of head and neck tumors; remission for 0.4–7.5 years (Ме 2.1 (1.5; 5.2)).RESULTS: With cut-off point 550 nmol/L sensitivity and specifity of IT was 100% and 60%, GT — 100% and 53% respectively. Minimal cortisol cut-off level for GT with sensitivity 100% was 500 nmol/L, maximal with specifity 100% — 400 nmol/L.Early morning cortisol levels did not exceed 250 nmol/l in 2 patients with SAI; and were above 500 nmol/l in 8 patients without SAI while primary or repeated examination.GHD was reviled by IT in all patients. Maximal GH concentrations in GT and IT did not differ significantly (p>0.05) but GT results of 4 patients exceeded or met cut-off for this test (7 ng/ml).GT was characterized by less severity compared with IT.CONCLUSIONS: For diagnostics of SAI by GT we can advise cut-off points of cortisol level 500 (sensitivity 100%, specifty 53%) and 400 nmol/L (sensitivity 80%, specifity 100%). Measuring of cortisol levels in 2–3 early morning blood samples allows to exclude or to suspect SAI in half of patients before tests. GH peaks in GT can exceed similarly data in IT that needs future investigation. 


Author(s):  
J. Argente ◽  
S.A.S. Abusrewil ◽  
G. Bona ◽  
F. Chiarelli ◽  
C.J.H. Kelnar ◽  
...  

AbstractAlthough it is difficult to reach international agreement on the definition of growth hormone deficiency (GHD) in children and adolescents, great efforts to do so have been made during the last two decades. A somewhat limited definition of GHD is: a combination of auxological, clinical, biochemical and metabolic abnormalities caused by lack or insufficiency of GH secretion that results in a decrease in the production of GH-dependent hormones and growth factors. Its aetiology is very complex. Therefore, specific studies must be performed during different periods of childhood (neonatal, prepubertal and pubertal periods). Auxological parameters, particularly growth velocity (GV), are still considered the best clinical measures for analysing human growth. The spectacular advances in our understanding of molecular biology during the past twenty years have allowed, and will continue to allow, a more and more precise diagnosis of the molecular anomalies of human growth. This will, in turn, allow changes caused by genetic lesions to be more efficiently distinguished from those due to nutritional, organic, tumoural, psychological or traumatic causes. Our knowledge of the molecular bases of undergrowth due to a deficiency in GH has developed as a result of the localisation and characterisation of human genes which code for proteins implicated in the hormonal regulation of growth. These genes include pituitary GH (GH1), pituitary transcription factor 1 (Pit-1), the prophet of Pit-1 (PROP-1), the pituitary; transcription factor LHX3, the transcription factor HESX1 and the GH-releasing hormone receptor (GHRHr). In addition, magnetic resonance imaging is the best available imaging method for the evaluation of size and structure of the pituitary and the parasellar region.


2019 ◽  
Vol 3 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Elisa Baranski Lamback ◽  
Stella Chiarini ◽  
Andreas Roposch ◽  
Mehul Dattani

2012 ◽  
Vol 78 (2) ◽  
pp. 94-99 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alexandra Geisler ◽  
Nina Lass ◽  
Nicole Reinsch ◽  
Yvonne Uysal ◽  
Viola Singer ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 3 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Meryl Brod ◽  
Michael Højby Rasmussen ◽  
Knud Vad ◽  
Suzanne Alolga ◽  
Jacques Bedoin

2021 ◽  
Vol 9 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mykola Aryayev ◽  
Liudmyla Senkivska ◽  
John B. Lowe

Objective: To identify psychosocial problems and self-esteem in children with growth hormone deficiency (GHD) and define the role of some clinical and sociodemographic determinants in the conceptualization of internalizing and externalizing problems as criteria for psychosocial functioning.Materials and Methods: A GHD sample (46 prepubescent children) was selected and compared to a matched control group (80 healthy children). Psychosocial functioning in children with GHD was investigated using Goodman's “Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ).” The study of children's self-esteem was carried out by the Dembo–Rubinstein method.Results: This study reveals that the GHD sample has more internalizing problems and lower self-esteem. Higher score and frequency of assessment in the abnormal score for “total difficulties,” “emotional problem,” and “peer problem” were found in children with GHD. The SDQ score and the frequency of assessment in the abnormal score for all SDQ scales in children with more pronounced growth deficit (height SDS < −3) did not exceed the same indicators in children with less growth retardation (−3 < height SDS < −2). A comparison of psychosocial features in children with isolated growth hormone deficiency and multiple pituitary hormones deficiency did not reveal differences in SDQ score and the frequency of assessment in the abnormal score for all SDQ scales. It was found that children with GHD have a reduced level of assertions, low self-esteem, and a weak discrepancy between the level of assertions and self-esteem. Some sociodemographic determinants (male gender, age < 9 years, and low family income) and clinical determinants (low compliance and suboptimal growth response after 1 year of rGHh therapy) have an impact on the overall assessment of psychological problems in children with GHD. The internalizing difficulties are associated with certain clinical determinants (growth status and treatment status) and sociodemographic determinants (female gender, age < 9 years).Conclusions: The identification of low self-esteem and the high SDQ score for scales “total difficulties,” “emotional problems,” and “peer problems” indicates psychosocial maladjustment and conceptualization of internalizing problems in children with GHD.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document