scholarly journals A Comparative Study of Fractionated Versus Single Dose Injection for Spinal Anesthesia During Cesarean Section in Patients with Pregnancy-Induced Hypertension

2019 ◽  
Vol In Press (In Press) ◽  
Author(s):  
Alfan Mahdi Nugroho ◽  
Adhrie Sugiarto ◽  
Susilo Chandra ◽  
Laras Lembahmanah ◽  
Rafidya Indah Septica ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Single Dose ◽  
Cesarean Section ◽  
Comparative Study ◽  
Spinal Anesthesia ◽  
Pregnancy Induced Hypertension ◽  
Induced Hypertension ◽  
Dose Injection

A Comparative Study of Placenta in Normal and Pregnancy Induced Hypertension

2012 ◽  
Vol 3 (6) ◽  
pp. 286-288
Author(s):  
Prakash Manae ◽  
◽  
Dr. Nazmeen Silotry ◽  
Dr. Aruna Mukherjee ◽  
Kishwor Bhandari ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Comparative Study ◽  
Pregnancy Induced Hypertension ◽  
Induced Hypertension

Management of pregnancy-induced hypertension with pindolol-comparative study with methyldopa

1986 ◽  
Vol 24 (1) ◽  
pp. 3-7 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. Ellenbogen ◽  
O. Jaschevatzky ◽  
A. Davidson ◽  
S. Anderman ◽  
S. Grunstein
Keyword(s):  
Comparative Study ◽  
Pregnancy Induced Hypertension ◽  
Induced Hypertension

Two cases of massive subchorionic thrombosis

2017 ◽  
Vol 6 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Megumi Kaneko ◽  
Yasuhiko Ebina ◽  
Nanae Shinozaki ◽  
Yui Yamasaki ◽  
Masashi Deguchi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Magnetic Resonance Imaging ◽  
Magnetic Resonance ◽  
Cesarean Section ◽  
Placental Abruption ◽  
Ultrasound Examination ◽  
Pregnancy Induced Hypertension ◽  
Resonance Imaging ◽  
Chorionic Plate ◽  
Induced Hypertension ◽  
Magnetic Resonance Imaging Mri

Abstract Massive subchorionic thrombosis (MST) is defined as a massive thrombosis under the chorionic plate, and is responsible for obstetric complications. We encountered two cases of MST. Placental abruption was misdiagnosed by ultrasound examination in Case 1, and a cesarean section was performed at 33 weeks of gestation. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) at 21 weeks of gestation suggested MST in Case 2. A cesarean section was performed at 26 weeks’ gestation because of pregnancy-induced hypertension, fetal growth restriction and non-reassuring fetal status.

scholarly journals General versus Spinal Anesthesia During Caesarean Section; A Narrative Review

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zahid Hussain Khan ◽  
Negar Eftekhar ◽  
Rafah Sabah Barrak
Keyword(s):  
Family History ◽  
Caesarean Section ◽  
Cesarean Section ◽  
Comparative Study ◽  
General Anesthesia ◽  
Medical History ◽  
Spinal Anesthesia ◽  
Narrative Review ◽  
Included Patient

This research is a method review type, comparative study between the effects of General anesthesia versus those of spinal anesthesia during caesarean section on the newborns and the mother undergoing cesarean section. The variables considered in the study included patient family history, patient medical history, status of patient during pregnancy, age of patient, and emergency or planned cesarean. Both general and spinal methods of anesthesia had differing results in multiple aspects and effects both during and after the surgery. However, pros of spinal anesthesia topped those of general anesthesia and is therefore the more favorable method of anesthesia.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document