scholarly journals Medical Humanism in Neurosurgery

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rajab Al-Ghanem

Patient-centered care means organizing health care that is respectful and responsive to the patient needs, preferences, and values, and ensuring that the patient values guide all clinical decisions. Teaching of medical humanism becomes a necessity to help neurosurgery residents in their future practice to do what they are already doing but in a more humanistic and empathic attitudes. A training programme to teach medical humanism core values through lectures, role modeling, and training in interpersonal skills, literature and humanities study can improve attitudes and behaviors. A set of 10 medical humanism values relevant to contemporary challenges, research, and practice of neurosurgery practice that can help residents and practicing physicians to maintain humanism behaviors in their practice are presented. A humanistic neurosurgeon provide a skilled, compassionate, and empathic care to her/his patients, and demonstrates respect for their values, autonomy, beliefs and cultural backgrounds. Neurosurgery is an apprenticeship profession, where humanism values can be taught and behaviors associated with humanism can be learned.

2017 ◽  
Author(s):  
Maria Alcocer Alkureishi ◽  
Wei Wei Lee ◽  
Sandra Webb ◽  
Vineet Arora

BACKGROUND Electronic health record (EHR) use can enhance or undermine the ability of providers to deliver effective, humanistic patient-centered care. Given patient-centered care has been found to positively impact patient health outcomes, it is critical to provide formal education on patient-centered EHR communication skills. Unfortunately, despite increasing worldwide EHR adoption, few institutions educate trainees on EHR communication best practices. OBJECTIVE The goal of this research was to develop and deliver mandatory patient-centered EHR training to all incoming housestaff at the University of Chicago. METHODS We developed a brief patient-centered EHR use curriculum highlighting best practices based on a literature search. Training was embedded into required EHR onboarding for all incoming housestaff (interns, residents, and fellows) at the University of Chicago in 2015 and was delivered by institutional Clinical Applications Trainers. An 11-item posttraining survey consisting of ten 5-point Likert scale questions and 1 open-ended question was administered. Responses at the high end of the scale were grouped to dichotomize data. RESULTS All 158 of the incoming 2015 postgraduate trainees participated in training and completed surveys (158/158, 100.0%). Just over half (86/158, 54.4%) were interns and the remaining were residents and fellows (72/158, 45.6%). One-fifth of respondents (32/158, 20.2%) were primary care trainees (defined as internal medicine, pediatric, and medicine-pediatric trainees), and the remaining 79.7% (126/158) were surgical or specialty trainees. Self-perceived pre- versus posttraining knowledge of barriers, best practices, and ability to implement patient-centered EHR skills significantly increased (3.1 vs 3.9, P<.001 for all). Most felt training was effective (90.5%), should be required (86.7%), and would change future practice as a result (70.9%). The only significant difference between intern and resident/fellow responses was prior knowledge of patient-centered EHR use barriers; interns endorsed higher prior knowledge than resident peers (3.27 vs 2.94 respectively, P=.03). Response comparison of specialty or surgical trainees (n=126) to primary care trainees (n=32) showed no significant differences in prior knowledge of barriers (3.09 vs 3.22, P=.50), of best practices (3.08 vs 2.94, P=.37), or prior ability to implement best practices (3.11 vs 2.84, P=.15). Primary care trainees had larger increases posttraining than surgical/specialty peers in knowledge of barriers (0.8 vs 0.7, P=.62), best practices (1.1 vs 0.8, P=.08), and ability to implement best practices (1.1 vs 0.7, P=.07), although none reached statistical significance. Primary care trainees also rated training as more effective (4.34 vs 4.09, P=.03) and felt training should be required (4.34 vs 4.09, P=.10) and would change their future practice as a result (4.13 vs 3.73, P=.02). CONCLUSIONS Embedding EHR communication skills training into required institutional EHR training is a novel and effective way to teach key EHR skills to trainees. Such training may help ground trainees in best practices and contribute to cultivating an institutional culture of humanistic, patient-centered EHR use.


2013 ◽  
Vol 31 (31_suppl) ◽  
pp. 99-99
Author(s):  
Sabrina Q. Mikan ◽  
Cynthia Taniguchi ◽  
J. Russell Hoverman ◽  
Susan Ash-Lee ◽  
Deb Harrison ◽  
...  

99 Background: Patients, families and healthcare providers can be apprehensive about having end-of-life (EOL) conversations. However, asking patients about personal values regarding their healthcare goals may create a platform for more in depth conversations. A quantitative instrument to assess patient values and ACP readiness was developed and validated to complement a process for identifying patients appropriate for ACP. Methods: Recruitment was conducted at seven cancer center sites in The US Oncology Network over a 90-day pilot study period. Of 871 identified patients, 301 Texas Oncology patients engaged in ACP. A cross-sectional descriptive design was used in 301 metastatic cancer patients. Sixty-three participants completed the questionnaire. The 13-item instrument was created after an extensive literature review regarding EOL choices and interventions using a 5-point Likert scale. Descriptive statistics were examined, in addition to analysis of the relationships between items using Pearson’s r correlations. Results: Participants were primarily female (59%) and Caucasian (95%); with a mean age of 66 years. Sixty-eight percent reported it "Very Important" to be told they were dying. There was a significant association between willingness to discuss feelings about dying and being told by their physician when dying, (r= 0.373, p<0.01). Sixty-two percent reported it "Very Important" to be able to choose their EOL care location. EOL care location and level of burden for caregivers were significantly associated (r= 0.315, p<0.05). Also, 76% reported being able to select the person who makes EOL decisions for them as "Very Important." Conclusions: Recent studies have shown the importance of assessment of patient healthcare values in the metastatic oncology population. The values and readiness instrument allows healthcare providers to understand the patient’s wishes early in the course of care. ACP can be guided through review of the validated instrument in the adult metastatic population. This provides appropriate weight to both sides of the care equation and is a major step toward creating patient-centered care. Further development of the instrument is needed in this population.


2015 ◽  
Vol 21 (4) ◽  
Author(s):  
Peter J. Pitts ◽  
Robert Goldberg

As stated in a recent article in the Journal of Clinical Oncology, ASCO established a Value in Cancer Care Task Force, with the goal of “developing a framework for comparing the relative clinical benefit, toxicity, and cost of treatment in the medical oncology setting. “  In developing this framework or tool, the Task Force runs roughshod over basic facts to create a metric that – while established to promote patient centered care – strives mightily to achieve the exact opposite outcome.


2017 ◽  
Vol 157 (4) ◽  
pp. 641-647 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nikhila Raol ◽  
Elizabeth Lilley ◽  
Zara Cooper ◽  
Jayme Dowdall ◽  
Megan A. Morris

Objective To study preoperative counseling in patients undergoing salvage total laryngectomy (STL). Study Design Case series with chart review. Setting Tertiary care academic hospital. Subjects and Methods We reviewed charts of patients ≥18 years undergoing STL between 2005 and 2015. Fifty-eight patients were identified. Notes written within 2 months prior to surgery by head and neck surgical oncologists, radiation oncologists, medical oncologists, speech-language pathologists, social workers, and nurse practitioners were extracted and coded into 4 categories. Coded content was then analyzed using a simple tally within content areas. Results Nonphysicians documented patient values and priorities, exclusive of treatment desires, more frequently. These topics included apprehension about family obligations, fear about communication, questions regarding quality of life, and anxiety regarding job continuation. Physician notes documented priorities regarding preferences for surgical treatment. No patients were seen by palliative care preoperatively, and only 14% (n = 8) patients had documentation of an end-of-life discussion. Conclusions Preoperative counseling for STL patients that included nonphysicians had a higher frequency of discussion of patients’ priorities. This suggests including these types of providers may lead to more patient-centered care. A prospective study evaluating patient and physician perceptions of preoperative counseling can better identify where discrepancies exists and help conceptualize a framework for preoperative counseling in STL patients and other patients undergoing high-risk surgery.


2012 ◽  
Vol 78 (1) ◽  
pp. 12-19
Author(s):  
Kevin E. Behrns ◽  
Edward M. Copeland ◽  
Richard J. Howard

Established in 1957, the University of Florida Department of Surgery has a solid foundation on which current faculty are driven to build a stronger tomorrow. The department is focused on promoting patient-centered care, expanding its research portfolio to improve techniques and outcomes, and training the surgical leaders of tomorrow. It fosters an environment where faculty, residents, students, and staff challenge long-held traditions with the goal of improving the health of our patients, the quality of our care, and the vitality of our work environment.


Author(s):  
Anastasius Moumtzoglou

Individualizing care must take into account the diversity of patient values and perspectives while attending to the specific needs of people must take into account the multifaceted nature of culture. Digital medicine enables digital proximity and self-care, challenges the traditional paternal model of medicine, reshapes the nature and expectations of health care delivery, emphasizes the active involvement of patients and has an enormous potential to empower patients. Moreover, the concepts of bio-objects, cultural competence, and patient-centered care could be apparently thought on a continuum with one pole representing the bio-objects and the other representing one of the health care quality dimensions, patient-centered care. All-embracing, digital medicine affects the core values of cultural competence, which are shared by patient-centered care, one of the health care quality dimensions.


2021 ◽  
pp. OP.20.00644 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anjali V. Desai ◽  
Rajiv Agarwal ◽  
Andrew S. Epstein ◽  
Gilad J. Kuperman ◽  
Chelsea L. Michael ◽  
...  

QUESTION ASKED: What is the most important information that diverse institutional stakeholders at a comprehensive cancer center need to know about patients to provide patient-centered care, and what is the best way to display this information in a new single-location feature in the electronic health record (EHR)? SUMMARY ANSWER: Thematic content analysis of semistructured interviews with a large and diverse group of institutional stakeholders at our comprehensive cancer center revealed themes informing design and development of the Patient Values Tab EHR feature, generated enthusiasm and buy-in for this digital innovation, created a sense of awareness among future users, and paved the way for implementation. WHAT WE DID: Qualitative data were collected through in-person, guide-based, audio-recorded, individual interviews with a total of 110 stakeholders representing a wide range of disciplines and professions, as well as others involved in administration of the hospital or clinics within our cancer center. WHAT WE FOUND: Respondents felt that to facilitate the delivery of patient-centered care, information in the following categories should be displayed: the patient's personhood, support system and resources, social history, communication preferences, future planning, end of life, and illness and treatment understanding. Other important themes that arose in the interviews included implementation considerations, improved communication and relationship building, and privacy implications. BIAS, CONFOUNDING FACTORS, DRAWBACKS, REAL-LIFE IMPLICATIONS: Since this study was conducted at a single dedicated cancer center, generalizability of findings across other healthcare settings merits further investigation. It is possible that non–English-speaking clinicians and patients, who were not interviewed, might have different needs or perspectives. We designed our Patient Values Tab for our institution's EHR (Allscripts); however, this display feature can be configured in other EHR software. By interviewing a large and varying sample of stakeholders and rigorously analyzing their responses, we obtained robust results to inform the development and implementation of this innovative EHR feature centralizing key information needed to enhance patient-centered cancer care. The introduction of the new Patient Values Tab at this well-known cancer center signals the importance of patient personhood and values throughout the institution and advances the use of the EHR as a driver of the delivery of patient-centered care throughout the illness.


2014 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
pp. 15-23 ◽  
Author(s):  
Helen Pryce ◽  
Amanda Hall

Shared decision-making (SDM), a component of patient-centered care, is the process in which the clinician and patient both participate in decision-making about treatment; information is shared between the parties and both agree with the decision. Shared decision-making is appropriate for health care conditions in which there is more than one evidence-based treatment or management option that have different benefits and risks. The patient's involvement ensures that the decisions regarding treatment are sensitive to the patient's values and preferences. Audiologic rehabilitation requires substantial behavior changes on the part of patients and includes benefits to their communication as well as compromises and potential risks. This article identifies the importance of shared decision-making in audiologic rehabilitation and the changes required to implement it effectively.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document