scholarly journals Craniofacial Corrective Surgery in Syndromic Craniosynostosis

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Khairul Bariah Chi Adam ◽  
Firdaus Hariri ◽  
Wei Lee Chee ◽  
Kathiravan Purmal ◽  
Mohd Faizal Abdullah ◽  
...  

This surgical field has now progressed and becoming an established subspecialty involving various surgical disciplines worldwide. Various complex CMF syndromes reported in syndromic craniosynostosis include Crouzon, Apert and Pfeiffer syndromes. These syndromes carry specific functional discrepancies associated with the affected structural anomaly and may therefore have functional issues involving the brain, eye and airway among others. As corrective surgery is often indicated depending on the affected vital functions, other factors that need to be considered are patient’s age, comorbidities, urgency, available expertise and patient’s overall prognosis based on the degree of anomaly. As such, the corrective surgery can be categorized into; (1) intermediate which is performed at an early phase and aimed to improve or salvage important vital functions such as the brain, eye, airway or feeding which are important for the child’s development and, (2) definitive treatment aimed at permanently correct the functional discrepancies. Intermediate corrective surgery may include invasive procedures such as ventriculo-peritoneal (VP) shunts, tarsorrhaphy, adenotonsillectomy and tracheostomy whereas definitive corrective surgery may include surgical procedures such as monobloc, Le Fort III osteotomy, posterior cranial vault expansion and mandibular advancement. This chapter will elaborate on the indications, types, challenges in the management and the proposed prevention measures in corrective surgery for specifically for syndromic craniosynostosis patients.

2004 ◽  
Vol 41 (6) ◽  
pp. 579-583 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. Emin Mavili ◽  
Gökhan Tunçbilek

Objective The traditional treatment for patients with syndromic craniosynostosis and midfacial retrusion has consisted of Le Fort III osteotomy and advancement. Distraction with rigid external systems allows advancement of the midface segment much more than the conventional methods. This excessive advancement resulted in the superiormost margin of the advancement segment becoming prominent. It can be felt easily with palpation and may influence the appearance of the patient negatively. This article presents a procedure osteotomy designed to modify the osteotomy lines at the lateral orbital rims and smooth the step deformity at the lateral canthal region. Results The seesaw osteotomy produced a smooth contour at the lateral orbital rim. Planned advancement was achieved without difficulty and without adverse long-term effects.


2019 ◽  
Vol 27 (2) ◽  
pp. 125-129
Author(s):  
Adam J. Mosa ◽  
Elizabeth Zellner ◽  
Emily S. Ho ◽  
Mark D. Fisher ◽  
John H. Phillips ◽  
...  

Purpose: In syndromic craniosynostosis, the Le Fort III osteotomy is used to correct dental/skeletal imbalance, improve exorbitism, and increase the airway. The purpose of this study is to perform a cost comparison between the standard technique of single-stage rigid internal fixation and distraction osteogenesis (DO) in the Le Fort III osteotomy in this patient population. Method: Hospital cost accounting databases were queried for patients undergoing single-stage advancement (SS) or DO from 2007 to 2016. Nominal cost data were adjusted using the Bank of Canada Consumer Price Index. Reported costs represented the full length of stay for all utilization per patient. Demographic information and cost data for single-stage osteotomy and DO were compared. Results: Total costs for single-stage (n = 8) were higher than distraction (n = 6; mean $CAD57 825 vs $38 268, P < .05). Intensive care unit (ICU) costs for single-stage were significantly higher than distraction (mean, $17 746 vs $5585, P < .005). Distraction cases had higher operating room (OR) costs than single stage, but the difference was not significant (mean, $12 540 vs $9696). Length of stay was significantly longer for SS patients (mean, 11 days vs 7 days, P < .05). Conclusions: This single-institution retrospective cost analysis indicates standard SS rigid internal fixation Le Fort III is more costly than DO. Despite higher OR costs, prolonged ICU and hospital stay was the primary reason behind this difference. This information may be of benefit when advocating for new technology perceived as high cost.


2017 ◽  
Vol 28 (5) ◽  
pp. 1344-1349 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ching-Hsuan Hu ◽  
Chieh-Tsai Wu ◽  
Ellen Wen-Ching Ko ◽  
Philip Kuo-Ting Chen

Author(s):  
I. Garcia Recuero ◽  
A.I. Romance ◽  
A. Rivero ◽  
M. Redondo ◽  
P. Hinojosa ◽  
...  

2006 ◽  
Vol 17 (6) ◽  
pp. 1050-1058 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kaneshige Satoh ◽  
Nobuyuki Mitsukawa ◽  
Yasuyoshi Tosa ◽  
Kohichi Kadomatsu

2010 ◽  
Vol 126 (3) ◽  
pp. 973-981 ◽  
Author(s):  
Pradip R. Shetye ◽  
Hitesh Kapadia ◽  
Barry H. Grayson ◽  
Joseph G. McCarthy

2015 ◽  
Vol 43 (6) ◽  
pp. 820-824 ◽  
Author(s):  
Frederik P. Bouw ◽  
Erik Nout ◽  
Jine S. van Bezooijen ◽  
Maarten J. Koudstaal ◽  
Jifke F. Veenland ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document