The Machine-Human Collaboration in Healthcare Innovation

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Neta Kela-Madar ◽  
Itai Kela
Keyword(s):  
Healthcare Innovation

scholarly journals Advancing UK Regulatory Science Strategy in the Context of Global Regulation: a Stakeholder Survey

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Samantha Cruz Rivera ◽  
Barbara Torlinska ◽  
Eliot Marston ◽  
Alastair K. Denniston ◽  
Kathy Oliver ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Pay For Performance ◽  
Regulatory Science ◽  
International Strategy ◽  
Free Text ◽  
The European Union ◽  
Accurate Definition ◽  
Definition Of ◽  
Healthcare Innovation ◽  
The Uk ◽  
Medium Enterprises

Abstract Background The UK’s transition from the European Union creates both an urgent need and key opportunity for the UK and its global collaborators to consider new approaches to the regulation of emerging technologies, underpinned by regulatory science. This survey aimed to identify the most accurate definition of regulatory science, to define strategic areas of the regulation of healthcare innovation which can be informed through regulatory science and to explore the training and infrastructure needed to advance UK and international regulatory science. Methods A survey was distributed to UK healthcare professionals, academics, patients, health technology assessment agencies, ethicists and trade associations, as well as international regulators, pharmaceutical companies and small or medium enterprises which have expertise in regulatory science and in developing or applying regulation in healthcare. Subsequently, a descriptive quantitative analyses of survey results and directed thematic analysis of free-text comments were applied. Results Priority areas for UK regulatory science identified by 145 participants included the following: flexibility: the capability of regulations to adapt to novel products and target patient outcomes; co-development: collaboration across sectors, e.g. patients, manufacturers, regulators, and educators working together to develop appropriate training for novel product deployment; responsiveness: the preparation of frameworks which enable timely innovation required by emerging events; speed: the rate at which new products can reach the market; reimbursement: developing effective tools to track and evaluate outcomes for “pay for performance” products; and education and professional development. Conclusions The UK has a time-critical opportunity to establish its national and international strategy for regulatory science leadership by harnessing broader academic input, developing strategic cross-sector collaborations, incorporating patients’ experiences and perspectives, and investing in a skilled workforce.

scholarly journals Healthcare innovation

2012 ◽  
Vol 5 (4) ◽  
pp. 187-188 ◽  
Author(s):  
Susan Hamer ◽  
Thomas Plochg ◽  
Paulo Moreira
Keyword(s):  
Healthcare Innovation

Understanding Healthcare Innovation Through a Dynamic Capabilities Lens

2018 ◽  
pp. 108-143
Author(s):  
Emre Karali ◽  
Federica Angeli ◽  
Jatinder S. Sidhu ◽  
Henk Volberda
Keyword(s):  
Dynamic Capabilities ◽  
Healthcare Innovation

Digital Transformation in Healthcare: Innovation and Technologies

2021 ◽  
pp. 61-79
Author(s):  
Suruchi Singh ◽  
Pankaj Bhatt ◽  
Satish Kumar Sharma ◽  
S. Rabiu
Keyword(s):  
Digital Transformation ◽  
Healthcare Innovation

Innovating in healthcare delivery: a systematic review and a preference-based framework of patient and provider needs

2019 ◽  
Vol 5 (2-3) ◽  
pp. 92-100
Author(s):  
Joseph S Salama ◽  
Alex Lee ◽  
Ashkan Afshin
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Quality Of Care ◽  
Conceptual Framework ◽  
Unmet Needs ◽  
Healthcare Delivery ◽  
Process Of Care ◽  
Literature Reviews ◽  
Reducing Costs ◽  
Healthcare Innovation

Healthcare innovation is becoming a popular but poorly defined option for those who are seeking new ways of reducing costs while also improving the quality of care. The process of innovating in healthcare delivery can be improved by identifying and understanding the unmet needs of patients and providers. We conducted two systematic literature reviews to identify the needs of these stakeholders throughout healthcare delivery and developed a conceptual framework for innovating in healthcare. Our results reveal tension between patients’ and providers’ preferences across three major categories—treatment and outcomes, process of care and structure of care. Therefore, innovating in healthcare may be better understood as addressing the unmet needs of each stakeholder by easing or eliminating tensions between stakeholders. This conceptual framework may serve as a useful instrument for health policymakers, payers and innovators to alike make better decisions as they invest in healthcare innovations.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document