scholarly journals Ecosystem Services across US Watersheds: A Meta-Analysis of Studies 2000–2014

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Antonio J. Castro ◽  
Jason P. Julian ◽  
Caryn C. Vaughn ◽  
Chelsea J Martin-Mikle ◽  
Cristina Quintas-Soriano
Keyword(s):  
Ecosystem Services ◽  
Meta Analysis

A meta-analysis of economic valuation of ecosystem services in Mexico

2018 ◽  
Vol 31 ◽  
pp. 126-141 ◽  
Author(s):  
José Alberto Lara-Pulido ◽  
Alejandro Guevara-Sanginés ◽  
Camilo Arias Martelo
Keyword(s):  
Ecosystem Services ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Economic Valuation ◽  
Valuation Of Ecosystem Services

A meta-analysis of coastal wetland ecosystem services in Liaoning Province, China

2018 ◽  
Vol 200 ◽  
pp. 349-358 ◽  
Author(s):  
Baodi Sun ◽  
Lijuan Cui ◽  
Wei Li ◽  
Xiaoming Kang ◽  
Xu Pan ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Ecosystem Services ◽  
Coastal Wetland ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Liaoning Province ◽  
Wetland Ecosystem

scholarly journals Which ecosystems provide which services? A meta-analysis of nine selected ecosystem services assessments

One Ecosystem ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 4 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael Bordt ◽  
Marc Saner
Keyword(s):  
Ecosystem Services ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Visual Methods ◽  
Ecosystem Assessments ◽  
Ecosystem Accounting ◽  
Local Ecosystem

For ecosystem measurement frameworks to be accepted, operationalised and implemented by diverse international communities, clear and agreeable concepts and classifications are essential. This paper analyses and develops two foundational typology challenges within ecosystem measurement: the classification of ecosystems and the classification of their services. Our aim is to determine if there is sufficient consensus to ascertain “Which ecosystems provide which services?” for standardised ecosystem accounting. This paper first compares classifications used in nine selected ecosystem assessments as input studies that make value statements about multiple ecosystems providing multiple ecosystem services. Given that these nine studies do not use identical concepts, classifications and terminologies, we develop “supersets” that can accommodate the diversity of classifications used in these input studies. Each input study is then corresponded to these new supersets. On the basis of this analysis, substantial consensus was found that some ecosystems are more likely to provide certain services than others are. However, for several ecosystem types, there was little or no consensus on which services they provide. Linkages for which there is consensus can serve as a checklist for future ecosystem services assessments. Both the framework of the supersets and the correspondence and visual methods developed will be useful for integrating information at different scales (for example, linkages from local, ecosystem-specific and ecosystem services-specific studies). This paper also provides guidance to future ecosystem services assessments to use, test and extend the current classifications of ecosystems and ecosystem services.

scholarly journals Restoration of ecosystem services in tropical forests: A global meta-analysis

PLoS ONE ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 13 (12) ◽  
pp. e0208523 ◽  
Author(s):  
Carolina Y. Shimamoto ◽  
André A. Padial ◽  
Carolina M. da Rosa ◽  
Márcia C. M. Marques
Keyword(s):  
Ecosystem Services ◽  
Tropical Forests ◽  
Meta Analysis

scholarly journals Vegetation responses and trade‐offs with soil‐related ecosystem services after shrub removal: A meta‐analysis

2019 ◽  
Vol 30 (10) ◽  
pp. 1219-1228 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stefani Daryanto ◽  
Lixin Wang ◽  
Bojie Fu ◽  
Wenwu Zhao ◽  
Shuai Wang
Keyword(s):  
Ecosystem Services ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Vegetation Responses ◽  
Trade Offs

Effects of different ecological restoration approaches on ecosystem services and biodiversity: a meta-analysis

2017 ◽  
Vol 37 (20) ◽  
Author(s):  
吴舒尧 WU Shuyao ◽  
黄姣 HUANG Jiao ◽  
李双成 LI Shuangcheng
Keyword(s):  
Ecosystem Services ◽  
Ecological Restoration ◽  
Meta Analysis

scholarly journals Ecosystem Services of Mangrove Forests: Results of a Meta-Analysis of Economic Values

2020 ◽  
Vol 17 (16) ◽  
pp. 5830
Author(s):  
Michael Getzner ◽  
Muhammad Shariful Islam
Keyword(s):  
Ecosystem Services ◽  
Conservation Management ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Conservation Status ◽  
Explanatory Power ◽  
Influential Factors ◽  
Direct Transfer ◽  
Mangrove Forests ◽  
Economic Values ◽  
Range Of Values

Mangrove forests are paramount for sustaining and enhancing ecosystem services benefitting both local and regional communities, and the global environment. Scholars have long studied the values of ecosystem services of mangrove forests. However, the number of recent primary studies monetizing ecosystem services is rather limited. This paper ascertains the values of ecosystem services of 66 primary valuation studies with a total of 250 observations. The results indicate that the range of values is substantially wide. This range cannot be explained sufficiently by the various differences of the studies, as the explanatory power of the econometric estimations is low. Main influential factors on the values of ecosystem services are the elicitation methods, the types of ecosystem services considered, and the conservation status of the respective mangrove forest as Ramsar site. The results stress the significant economic values of ecosystem services of mangrove forests and the importance for conservation management. However, the results also caution against a direct transfer of benefits between sites. The substantial variety of site and country specifics warrants the implementation of separate, original valuation studies.

REVIEW: Do polycultures promote win-wins or trade-offs in agricultural ecosystem services? A meta-analysis

2014 ◽  
Vol 51 (6) ◽  
pp. 1593-1602 ◽  
Author(s):  
Aaron L. Iverson ◽  
Linda E. Marín ◽  
Katherine K. Ennis ◽  
David J. Gonthier ◽  
Benjamin T. Connor-Barrie ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Ecosystem Services ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Agricultural Ecosystem ◽  
Trade Offs
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document