scholarly journals Extracorporeal Shock Wave Therapy: Non‐Urological Indications and Recent Trends

2017 ◽  
Author(s):  
Noha Maraie ◽  
Omar Mohammed Osman ◽  
Hosni Khairy Salem
Keyword(s):  
Shock Wave ◽  
Extracorporeal Shock Wave Therapy ◽  
Shock Wave Therapy ◽  
Extracorporeal Shock Wave ◽  
Recent Trends

scholarly journals Platelet rich plasma versus extracorporeal shock wave therapy in patients with non-calcific supraspinatous tears

2020 ◽  
Vol 47 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Samah M. Alian ◽  
Rabab S. Zaghlol ◽  
Sahar S. Khalil
Keyword(s):  
Shock Wave ◽  
Outcome Measures ◽  
Platelet Rich Plasma ◽  
Extracorporeal Shock Wave Therapy ◽  
Shock Wave Therapy ◽  
Tendon Tear ◽  
Extracorporeal Shock Wave ◽  
Group I ◽  
Group Ii

Abstract Background To compare the clinical efficacy of platelet rich plasma (PRP) subacromial injection and extracorporeal shock wave therapy (ESWT) on refractory non-calcific partial thickness supraspinatous tendon tear. Results Significant improvement in all outcome measures achieved in both groups at 4 weeks follow-up period (the end of treatment course) (P< 0.05). At 12 weeks follow-up period, group I, showed significant improvement in all outcome measures compared to baseline and group II; however, in group II, there was no significant difference compared to baseline; moreover, deterioration in the previous improvement was noticed. Conclusion Both PRP (group I) and ESWT (group II) are effective therapeutic methods in the management of refractory non-calcific partial thickness supraspinatous tendon tear; however, PRP (group I) has better long-term effects on both pain and function.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document