scholarly journals Immune Checkpoint Blockade and Adaptive Immune Resistance in Cancer

10.5772/66494 ◽  
2017 ◽  
Author(s):  
Raymond M. Wong ◽  
Robert B. Cameron
Keyword(s):  
Immune Checkpoint ◽  
Immune Checkpoint Blockade ◽  
Checkpoint Blockade ◽  
Adaptive Immune ◽  
Immune Resistance

scholarly journals Sufficiency of CD40 activation and immune checkpoint blockade for T cell priming and tumor immunity

2020 ◽  
Vol 117 (14) ◽  
pp. 8022-8031 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alexander H. Morrison ◽  
Mark S. Diamond ◽  
Ceire A. Hay ◽  
Katelyn T. Byrne ◽  
Robert H. Vonderheide
Keyword(s):  
T Cell ◽  
Immune Checkpoint ◽  
Tumor Model ◽  
Immune Checkpoint Blockade ◽  
Checkpoint Blockade ◽  
Cell Responses ◽  
Adaptive Immune ◽  
Cd40 Activation ◽  
Polyfunctional T Cells ◽  
Complete Tumor

Innate immune receptors such as toll-like receptors (TLRs) provide critical molecular links between innate cells and adaptive immune responses. Here, we studied the CD40 pathway as an alternative bridge between dendritic cells (DCs) and adaptive immunity in cancer. Using an experimental design free of chemo- or radiotherapy, we found CD40 activation with agonistic antibodies (⍺CD40) produced complete tumor regressions in a therapy-resistant pancreas cancer model, but only when combined with immune checkpoint blockade (ICB). This effect, unachievable with ICB alone, was independent of TLR, STING, or IFNAR pathways. Mechanistically, αCD40/ICB primed durable T cell responses, and efficacy required DCs and host expression of CD40. Moreover, ICB drove optimal generation of polyfunctional T cells in this “cold” tumor model, instead of rescuing T cell exhaustion. Thus, immunostimulation via αCD40 is sufficient to synergize with ICB for priming. Clinically, combination αCD40/ICB may extend efficacy in patients with “cold” and checkpoint-refractory tumors.

scholarly journals Bifunctional PD-1 × αCD3 × αCD33 fusion protein reverses adaptive immune escape in acute myeloid leukemia

Blood ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 132 (23) ◽  
pp. 2484-2494 ◽  
Author(s):  
Monika Herrmann ◽  
Christina Krupka ◽  
Katrin Deiser ◽  
Bettina Brauchle ◽  
Anetta Marcinek ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Acute Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
T Cell ◽  
T Cell Activation ◽  
Immune Checkpoint ◽  
Myeloid Leukemia ◽  
Cell Activation ◽  
Immune Checkpoint Blockade ◽  
Checkpoint Blockade ◽  
Adaptive Immune ◽  
Acute Myeloid

Abstract The CD33-targeting bispecific T-cell engager (BiTE) AMG 330 proved to be highly efficient in mediating cytolysis of acute myeloid leukemia (AML) cells in vitro and in mouse models. Yet, T-cell activation is correlated with upregulation of programmed cell death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) and other inhibitory checkpoints on AML cells that confer adaptive immune resistance. PD-1 and PD-L1 blocking agents may counteract T-cell dysfunction, however, at the expense of broadly distributed immune-related adverse events (irAEs). We developed a bifunctional checkpoint inhibitory T cell–engaging (CiTE) antibody that combines T-cell redirection to CD33 on AML cells with locally restricted immune checkpoint blockade. This is accomplished by fusing the extracellular domain of PD-1 (PD-1ex), which naturally holds a low affinity to PD-L1, to an αCD3.αCD33 BiTE-like scaffold. By a synergistic effect of checkpoint blockade and avidity-dependent binding, the PD-1ex attachment increases T-cell activation (3.3-fold elevation of interferon-γ) and leads to efficient and highly selective cytotoxicity against CD33+PD-L1+ cell lines (50% effective concentration = 2.3-26.9 pM) as well as patient-derived AML cells (n = 8). In a murine xenograft model, the CiTE induces complete AML eradication without initial signs of irAEs as measured by body weight loss. We conclude that our molecule preferentially targets AML cells, whereas high-affinity blockers, such as clinically approved anticancer agents, also address PD-L1+ non-AML cells. By combining the high efficacy of T-cell engagers with immune checkpoint blockade in a single molecule, we expect to minimize irAEs associated with the systemic application of immune checkpoint inhibitors and suggest high therapeutic potential, particularly for patients with relapsed/ refractory AML.

Analysis of Advanced Melanomas Changed from Immune Checkpoint Blockade Therapy to Palliative Care

2018 ◽  
Vol 80 (1) ◽  
pp. 51-55
Author(s):  
Ai KAJITA ◽  
Osamu YAMASAKI ◽  
Tatsuya KAJI ◽  
Hiroshi UMEMURA ◽  
Keiji IWATSUKI
Keyword(s):  
Palliative Care ◽  
Immune Checkpoint ◽  
Immune Checkpoint Blockade ◽  
Checkpoint Blockade

Potential immunotherapy for Alzheimer disease and age-related dementia

2019 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
pp. 21-25 ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Immune System ◽  
Alzheimer Disease ◽  
Cross Talk ◽  
Immune Checkpoint ◽  
Short Review ◽  
Immune Checkpoint Blockade ◽  
Checkpoint Blockade ◽  
New Approach ◽  
Age Related ◽  
The Brain

Emerging results support the concept that Alzheimer disease (AD) and age-related dementia are affected by the ability of the immune system to contain the brain's pathology. Accordingly, well-controlled boosting, rather than suppression of systemic immunity, has been suggested as a new approach to modify disease pathology without directly targeting any of the brain's disease hallmarks. Here, we provide a short review of the mechanisms orchestrating the cross-talk between the brain and the immune system. We then discuss how immune checkpoint blockade directed against the PD-1/PD-L1 pathways could be developed as an immunotherapeutic approach to combat this disease using a regimen that will address the needs to combat AD.

Potential immunotherapy for Alzheimer disease and age-related dementia

2019 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
pp. 21-25 ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Immune System ◽  
Alzheimer Disease ◽  
Cross Talk ◽  
Immune Checkpoint ◽  
Short Review ◽  
Immune Checkpoint Blockade ◽  
Checkpoint Blockade ◽  
New Approach ◽  
Age Related ◽  
The Brain

Emerging results support the concept that Alzheimer disease (AD) and age-related dementia are affected by the ability of the immune system to contain the brain’s pathology. Accordingly, well-controlled boosting, rather than suppression of systemic immunity, has been suggested as a new approach to modify disease pathology without directly targeting any of the brain’s disease hallmarks. Here, we provide a short review of the mechanisms orchestrating the cross-talk between the brain and the immune system. We then discuss how immune checkpoint blockade directed against the PD-1/PD-L1 pathways could be developed as an immunotherapeutic approach to combat this disease using a regimen that will address the needs to combat AD.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document