scholarly journals Venoarterial Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation in Refractory Cardiogenic Shock and Cardiac Arrest

10.5772/63578 ◽  
2016 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marie-Eve Brunner ◽  
Carlo Banfi ◽  
Raphaël Giraud
Keyword(s):  
Cardiac Arrest ◽  
Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation ◽  
Cardiogenic Shock ◽  
Membrane Oxygenation ◽  
Venoarterial Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation ◽  
Refractory Cardiogenic Shock

scholarly journals Venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation for refractory cardiogenic shock post-cardiac arrest

2016 ◽  
Vol 42 (12) ◽  
pp. 1999-2007 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marc Pineton de Chambrun ◽  
Nicolas Bréchot ◽  
Guillaume Lebreton ◽  
Matthieu Schmidt ◽  
Guillaume Hekimian ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cardiac Arrest ◽  
Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation ◽  
Cardiogenic Shock ◽  
Membrane Oxygenation ◽  
Venoarterial Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation ◽  
Refractory Cardiogenic Shock

scholarly journals Correction to: Venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation for refractory cardiogenic shock post-cardiac arrest

2017 ◽  
Vol 43 (12) ◽  
pp. 1940-1940
Author(s):  
Marc Pineton de Chambrun ◽  
Nicolas Bréchot ◽  
Guillaume Lebreton ◽  
Matthieu Schmidt ◽  
Guillaume Hekimian ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cardiac Arrest ◽  
Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation ◽  
Cardiogenic Shock ◽  
Membrane Oxygenation ◽  
Venoarterial Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation ◽  
Refractory Cardiogenic Shock

scholarly journals Biventricular Unloading with Impella and Venoarterial Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation in Severe Refractory Cardiogenic Shock: Implications from the Combined Use of the Devices and Prognostic Risk Factors of Survival

2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (4) ◽  
pp. 747
Author(s):  
Georgios Chatzis ◽  
Styliani Syntila ◽  
Birgit Markus ◽  
Holger Ahrens ◽  
Nikolaos Patsalis ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factors ◽  
Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation ◽  
Cardiogenic Shock ◽  
Risk Scores ◽  
Circulatory Support ◽  
Membrane Oxygenation ◽  
Venoarterial Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation ◽  
Refractory Cardiogenic Shock ◽  
Lactate Levels ◽  
Va Ecmo

Since mechanical circulatory support (MCS) devices have become integral component in the therapy of refractory cardiogenic shock (RCS), we identified 67 patients in biventricular support with Impella and venoarterial Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation (VA-ECMO) for RCS between February 2013 and December 2019 and evaluated the risk factors of mortality in this setting. Mean age was 61.07 ± 10.7 and 54 (80.6%) patients were male. Main cause of RCS was acute myocardial infarction (AMI) (74.6%), while 44 (65.7%) were resuscitated prior to admission. The mean Simplified Acute Physiology Score II (SAPS II) and Sequential Organ Failure Assessment Score (SOFA) score on admission was 73.54 ± 16.03 and 12.25 ± 2.71, respectively, corresponding to an expected mortality of higher than 80%. Vasopressor doses and lactate levels were significantly decreased within 72 h on biventricular support (p < 0.05 for both). Overall, 17 (25.4%) patients were discharged to cardiac rehabilitation and 5 patients (7.5%) were bridged successfully to ventricular assist device implantation, leading to a total of 32.8% survival on hospital discharge. The 6-month survival was 31.3%. Lactate > 6 mmol/L, vasoactive score > 100 and pH < 7.26 on initiation of biventricular support, as well as Charlson comorbity index > 3 and prior resuscitation were independent predictors of survival. In conclusion, biventricular support with Impella and VA-ECMO in patients with RCS is feasible and efficient leading to a better survival than predicted through traditional risk scores, mainly via significant hemodynamic improvement and reduction in lactate levels.

scholarly journals Cost-utility of venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation in cardiogenic shock and cardiac arrest

2020 ◽  
Vol 9 (4) ◽  
pp. 333-341
Author(s):  
Salla Jäämaa-Holmberg ◽  
Birgitta Salmela ◽  
Raili Suojaranta ◽  
Karl B Lemström ◽  
Jyri Lommi
Keyword(s):  
Cardiac Arrest ◽  
Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation ◽  
Cardiogenic Shock ◽  
Cost Utility ◽  
Quality Adjusted Life Years ◽  
Membrane Oxygenation ◽  
Venoarterial Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation ◽  
Life Years ◽  
The Cost ◽  
Quality Adjusted Life

Background: The use of venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation in cardiogenic shock keeps increasing, but its cost-utility is unknown. Methods: We studied retrospectively the cost-utility of venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation in a five-year cohort of consequent patients treated due to refractory cardiogenic shock or cardiac arrest in a transplant centre in 2013–2017. In our centre, venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation is considered for all cardiogenic shock patients potentially eligible for heart transplantation, and for selected postcardiotomy patients. We assessed the costs of the index hospitalization and of the one-year hospital costs, and the patients’ health-related quality of life (response rate 71.7%). Based on the data and the population-based life expectancies, we calculated the amount and the costs of quality-adjusted life years gained both without discount and with an annual discount of 3.5%. Results: The cohort included 102 patients (78 cardiogenic shock; 24 cardiac arrest) of whom 67 (65.7%) survived to discharge and 66 (64.7%) to one year. The effective costs per one hospital survivor were 242,303€. Median in-hospital costs of the index hospitalization per patient were 129,967€ (interquartile range 150,340€). Mean predicted number of quality-adjusted life years gained by the treatment was 20.9 (standard deviation 9.7) without discount, and the median cost per quality-adjusted life year was 7474€ (interquartile range 10,973€). With the annual discount of 3.5%, 13.0 (standard deviation 4.8) quality-adjusted life years were gained with the cost of 12,642€ per quality-adjusted life year (interquartile range 15,059€). Conclusions: We found the use of venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation in refractory cardiogenic shock and cardiac arrest justified from the cost-utility point of view in a transplant centre setting.

scholarly journals Complete percutaneous angio-guided approach using preclosing for venoarterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation implantation and explantation in patients with refractory cardiogenic shock or cardiac arrest

Critical Care ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 25 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Anne-Sophie Martin-Tuffreau ◽  
François Bagate ◽  
Madjid Boukantar ◽  
Gabriel Saiydoun ◽  
Andrea Mangiameli ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cardiac Arrest ◽  
Extracorporeal Membrane Oxygenation ◽  
Cardiogenic Shock ◽  
Vascular Complications ◽  
Vascular Complication ◽  
Technical Success Rate ◽  
Surgical Closure ◽  
Membrane Oxygenation ◽  
Refractory Cardiogenic Shock ◽  
Va Ecmo

Abstract Background The approach for veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation implantation (VA-ECMO) in patients with cardiogenic shock can be either surgical or percutaneous. Complete angio-guided percutaneous implantation and explantation could decrease vascular complications. We sought to describe the initial results of complete percutaneous angio-guided ECMO implantation and explantation using preclosing. Methods All consecutive patients who underwent peripheral femoro-femoral VA-ECMO percutaneous implantation for refractory cardiogenic shock or cardiac arrest were enrolled in a prospective registry (03/2018–12/2020). Percutaneous preclosing using two closing devices (Perclose ProGlide, Abbott) inserted before cannulation was used in both femoral artery and vein. Explantation was performed using a crossover technique under angiographic guidance. The occurrence of vascular complication was recorded. Results Among the 56 patients who underwent percutaneous VA-ECMO implantation for cardiogenic shock or refractory cardiac arrest, 41 underwent preclosing. Femoral vessel cannulation was successful in all patients and total cannulation time was 20 (10–40) min. Weaning from ECMO was possible in 22/41 patients (54%) and 12 (29%) patients were alive at day 30. Significant vascular complications occurred in 2/41 patients. Percutaneous decannulation was performed in 20 patients with 19/20 technical success rate. All femoral arteries and veins were properly closed using the pre-closing devices without bleeding on the angiographic control except for one patient in whom surgical closure of the artery was required. No patient required transfusion for access related significant bleeding and no other vascular complication occurred. Furthermore, no groin infection was observed after full percutaneous implantation and removal of ECMO. Conclusion Emergent complete percutaneous angio-guided VA-ECMO implantation and explantation using pre-closing technique can be an attractive strategy in patients referred for refractory cardiogenic shock.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document