scholarly journals A Systematic Review of Anxiety Disorders following Mild, Moderate and Severe TBI in Children and Adolescents

10.5772/60426 ◽  
2015 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michelle Albicini ◽  
Audrey McKinlay
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Anxiety Disorders ◽  
Children And Adolescents ◽  
Severe Tbi

scholarly journals Review: Economic evidence of preventive interventions for anxiety disorders in children and adolescents – a systematic review

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Vartiainen Anna‐Kaisa ◽  
Kuvaja‐Köllner Virpi ◽  
Rantsi Mervi ◽  
Rissanen Elisa ◽  
Luntamo Terhi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Anxiety Disorders ◽  
Children And Adolescents ◽  
Economic Evidence ◽  
Preventive Interventions

scholarly journals Prognostic Models of Mortality from Accidental Severe Traumatic Brain Injury in Children and Adolescents: A Systematic Review

2021 ◽  
Vol 3 (3(September-December)) ◽  
Author(s):  
Jose Roberto Tude Melo ◽  
Marcelo Liberato Coelho Mendes de Carvalho
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Traumatic Brain Injury ◽  
Brain Injury ◽  
Children And Adolescents ◽  
Severe Traumatic Brain Injury ◽  
Scientific Evidence ◽  
Prognostic Models ◽  
Evidence Based ◽  
Level Of Evidence ◽  
Severe Tbi

Introduction: Prognostic models are statistical models that combine two or more items of patient data to predict clinical outcomes. Objective: Identify prognostic models of mortality developed and published in the medical literature for possible applicability in children and adolescents victims of severe traumatic brain injury (TBI). Methods: Systematic review in the Medline electronic database (PubMed platform) of scientific articles published from 2006 (year of publication of the last systematic review on prognostic models for TBI before 2017) until July 29, 2017. Results: Ten studies on prognostic models of mortality in children and adolescents victims of severe TBI were identified for final inclusion in the review. There were eight development and two validation studies conducted in different countries. Conclusion: The analysis of this systematic review makes it possible to conclude that the ten prognostic models included in the final sample provide health professionals with a scientific evidence-based understanding of the severity of pediatric victims of severe TBI. This systematic review is classified as presenting 2A and 1 level of evidence (systematic review of homogeneous cohorts), according to the 2009 and 2011 classifications, respectively, of the Oxford Center for Evidence-Based Medicine

Prenatal and perinatal risk factors for anxiety disorders among children and adolescents: A systematic review

2020 ◽  
Vol 277 ◽  
pp. 85-93
Author(s):  
Tiia Ståhlberg ◽  
Prakash Khanal ◽  
Roshan Chudal ◽  
Terhi Luntamo ◽  
Kim Kronström ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factors ◽  
Systematic Review ◽  
Anxiety Disorders ◽  
Children And Adolescents ◽  
Perinatal Risk Factors ◽  
Perinatal Risk

scholarly journals Cognitive-behavioral therapy for anxiety disorders in children and adolescents: a systematic review of follow-up studies

2014 ◽  
Vol 63 (4) ◽  
pp. 373-378 ◽  
Author(s):  
Roberta Davis ◽  
Maria Augusta Mansur de Souza ◽  
Roberta Rigatti ◽  
Elizeth Heldt
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Cognitive Behavioral Therapy ◽  
Anxiety Disorders ◽  
Children And Adolescents ◽  
Behavioral Therapy ◽  
Cognitive Behavioral ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Term Response

Objective To conduct a systematic review about the long-term response to cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT) for anxiety disorders (ADs) in children and adolescents. Methods The PubMed and ISI Web of Science databases were consulted. Search in the databases was performed in November 2012 and included cohort studies after CBT for ADs in children and adolescents with a follow-up period over 12 months. Results A total of 10 papers met the inclusion criteria. The follow-up period ranged from 12 months to 13 years and the results generally showed maintenance of the short-term benefits with CBT. However, the studies presented limitations, especially regarding methods, such as lack of a control group and losses to follow-up. Conclusion The long-term benefits of CBT were identified, however it would be interesting to conduct other studies with more frequent assessment periods, in order to minimize losses to follow-up, in addition to evaluating children and adolescents in the various stages of their development.

Are antidepressants effective in quality of life improvement among children and adolescents? A systematic review

CNS Spectrums ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 19 (2) ◽  
pp. 134-141 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dejan Stevanovic ◽  
Ivana Tadic ◽  
Rajna Knez
Keyword(s):  
Quality Of Life ◽  
Systematic Review ◽  
Clinical Trials ◽  
Anxiety Disorders ◽  
Children And Adolescents ◽  
Antidepressant Treatment ◽  
Positive Effects ◽  
Related Quality ◽  
Health Related

There is some evidence indicating that psychotropic medications might lead to health-related quality of life (QOL) improvements among children and adolescents with psychiatric disorders. The aim of this systematic review is to assess evidence regarding whether antidepressant treatment improves QOL among children and adolescents with depressive or anxiety disorders. A comprehensive search resulted in 5 clinical trials to be included in this review: 4 trials with major depressive disorder (MDD) and 1 trial with social anxiety disorder (SAD). In one MDD trial, fluoxetine combined with cognitive behavior therapy (CBT) significantly improved QOL compared to fluoxetine or CBT alone (effect sizes were 0.53 and 0.69, respectively). In 2 combined trials, sertraline alone significantly improved QOL among adolescents with MDD (effect size was 0.29), but not among children with MDD. Essentially, it was observed that antidepressants in these trials had minor positive effects on QOL improvement, which were lower than their potential to improve depressive symptoms. Although fluoxetine with CBT or sertraline monotherapy were shown to have some potential to improve QOL, this systematic review found inconclusive evidence that antidepressant treatments improve QOL among children and adolescents with depressive or anxiety disorders. More research is required, considering that QOL is currently under-evaluated in clinical trials with antidepressants among children and adolescents and available trials have limited methodological quality when reporting QOL data.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document