scholarly journals Autologous Muscular Treatment Options for Endstage Heart Failure — A Critical Appraisal of the Dynamic Cardiomyoplasty (DCMP) vs. a New Concept of a Closed-Loop Controlled DCMP (CLC-DCMP)

10.5772/55900 ◽  
2013 ◽  
Author(s):  
Norbert W. ◽  
Peter Klapproth ◽  
Hans-H. Sievers
Keyword(s):  
Heart Failure ◽  
Closed Loop ◽  
Critical Appraisal ◽  
Treatment Options ◽  
Dynamic Cardiomyoplasty

INFLUENCE OF RIGHT VENTRICULAR LEAD IMPLANTATION SITE CHOICE ON PACING EFFICIENCY

2020 ◽  
pp. 13-17
Author(s):  
Dmitrii Aleksandrovich Lopyn ◽  
Stanislav Valerevich Rybchynskyi ◽  
Dmitrii Evgenevich Volkov
Keyword(s):  
Heart Failure ◽  
Right Ventricular ◽  
Longitudinal Strain ◽  
Treatment Options ◽  
Global Longitudinal Strain ◽  
Optimal Method ◽  
Cardiac Stimulation ◽  
Ventricular Lead ◽  
The Right ◽  
Stimulation Of

Currently the electrophysiological treatment options have been considered to be the most effective for many patients with arrhythmogenic cardiomyopathies, as well as in those with arrhythmias on the background of heart failure. Currently, the dependence of efficiency of the pacemakers on the location of the electrodes has been proven. In order to study the effect of a myocardial dysynchrony on the effectiveness of pacing depending on the location of the right ventricular electrode, an investigation has been performed. This study comprised the patients with a complete atrioventricular block, preserved ejection fraction of the left ventricle (more than 50 %), with no history of myocardial infarction, who were implanted with the two−chamber pacemaker. It has been established that the best results were achieved with a stimulation of the middle and lower septal zone of the right ventricle, the worst ones were obtained with a stimulation of its apex. It has been found that the dynamics of the magnitude of segmental strains and a global longitudinal strain coincided with the dynamics of other parameters of the pacemaker effectiveness, which indicated the pathogenetic value of myocardial dysynchrony in the progression of heart failure after implantation of the pacemaker. Therefore it could be concluded that the studying of myocardial mobility by determining a longitudinal strain for assessing the functional state of the myocardium and the effectiveness of pacing is highly advisable. It is emphasized that the use of the latest strains−dependent techniques for cardiac performance evaluation in the patients with bradyarrhythmia have a great potential to predict the development of chronic heart failure and to choose the optimal method of physiological stimulation of the heart. Key words: right ventricular lead, cardiac stimulation, myocardial dyssynchrony.

Heart failure in an elderly population

2001 ◽  
Vol 11 (4) ◽  
pp. 311-321
Author(s):  
DN Carmichael ◽  
Michael Lye
Keyword(s):  
Heart Failure ◽  
Treatment Options ◽  
Clinical Syndrome ◽  
Point Of View ◽  
Diagnostic Challenge ◽  
The Common ◽  
Characteristic Features ◽  
The Many ◽  
Neuroendocrine Activation ◽  
Symptoms And Signs

Heart failure has been defined in many ways and definitions change over time. The multiplicity of definitions reflect the paucity of our understanding of the primary underlying physiology of heart failure and the many diseases for which heart failure is the common end-point. Fundamentally, heart failure represents a failure of the heart to meet the body’s requirement for blood supply for whatever reason. It is thus a clinical syndrome with characteristic features – not a single disease in its own right. The syndrome includes symptoms and signs of organ underperfusion, fluid retention and neuroendocrine activation. The syndrome arises from a range of possible causes of which ischaemic heart disease is the commonest. From the point of view of a clinician, the underlying pathology will determine treatment options and prognosis. The extensive range of possible aetiologies present a diagnostic challenge both to correctly identify the syndrome amongst all other causes of dyspnoea and to identify the aetiology, allowing optimization of treatment.

Alternative Modes of Mechanical Ventilation

2018 ◽  
Vol 29 (4) ◽  
pp. 396-404
Author(s):  
John J. Gallagher
Keyword(s):  
Mechanical Ventilation ◽  
Closed Loop ◽  
Treatment Options ◽  
Ventilatory Support ◽  
Dual Control ◽  
Mechanical Ventilators ◽  
Lung Protection ◽  
Ventilation Modes ◽  
Volume Controlled ◽  
Pressure Controlled

Modern mechanical ventilators are more complex than those first developed in the 1950s. Newer ventilation modes can be difficult to understand and implement clinically, although they provide more treatment options than traditional modes. These newer modes, which can be considered alternative or nontraditional, generally are classified as either volume controlled or pressure controlled. Dual-control modes incorporate qualities of pressure-controlled and volume-controlled modes. Some ventilation modes provide variable ventilatory support depending on patient effort and may be classified as closed-loop ventilation modes. Alternative modes of ventilation are tools for lung protection, alveolar recruitment, and ventilator liberation. Understanding the function and application of these alternative modes prior to implementation is essential and is most beneficial for the patient.

Comparison of treatment options for depression in heart failure: A network meta-analysis

2019 ◽  
Vol 108 ◽  
pp. 7-23 ◽  
Author(s):  
Avash Das ◽  
Bhaskar Roy ◽  
Guido Schwarzer ◽  
Michael G. Silverman ◽  
Olivia Ziegler ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Heart Failure ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Treatment Options

scholarly journals Caesarean Section in Eclampsia and its Outcome in Bangladesh

KYAMC Journal ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 6 (1) ◽  
pp. 583-586
Author(s):  
MA Mazid ◽  
Shahida Akter
Keyword(s):  
Heart Failure ◽  
Pulmonary Embolism ◽  
Caesarean Section ◽  
Conservative Management ◽  
Causes Of Death ◽  
Post Partum ◽  
Economic Status ◽  
Treatment Options ◽  
Age Difference ◽  
Significant Difference

This prospective study was carried out on a total number of 58 eclamptic subjects during the period of July 2010 to June 2012 where 38 were undergone caesarean section (LUCS - Lower Uterine Caesarean Section) and 20 received conservative management. Mean (±SD) Age of the subjects who undergone Caesarean Section and conservative management (NVD) were 23.67±8.63 and 23.45±9.31 years respectively. Significant mean age difference was also present between these two groups. In 38 subjects of LUCS 34 subjects were recovered and rest 4 cases were died. Possible causes of death were due to heart failure and post partum pulmonary embolism. Among these 20 subjects who were treated conservatively 14 were recovered and 6 subjects were died. Causes of death in these groups were pulmonary embolism, Septic pneumonia, and HELLP syndrome. Significant difference was found between these two treatment options. It was observed that socio-demographic, economic status and BMI had significant effects on management outcome.KYAMC Journal Vol. 6, No.-1, Jul 2015, Page 583-586

scholarly journals Process evaluation of a randomised pilot trial of home-based rehabilitation compared to usual care in patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction and their caregiver’s

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Karen Smith ◽  
Chim Lang ◽  
Jenny Wingham ◽  
Julia Frost ◽  
Colin Greaves ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Heart Failure ◽  
Ejection Fraction ◽  
Cardiac Rehabilitation ◽  
Process Evaluation ◽  
Treatment Options ◽  
Pilot Trial ◽  
Qualitative Assessment ◽  
Intervention Fidelity ◽  
Preserved Ejection Fraction ◽  
Home Based

Abstract Background: Whilst almost 50 percent of heart failure (HF) patients have preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF), evidence-based treatment options for this patient group remain limited. However, there is growing evidence of the potential value of exercise-based cardiac rehabilitation. This study reports the process evaluation of the Rehabilitation Enablement in Chronic Heart Failure (REACH-HF) intervention for HFpEF patients and their caregivers conducted as part of the REACH-HFpEF pilot trial. Methods: Process evaluation sub-study parallel to a single centre (Tayside, Scotland) randomised controlled pilot trial with qualitative assessment of both intervention fidelity delivery and HFpEF patients’ and caregivers’ experiences. The REACH-HF intervention consisted of self-help manual for patients and caregivers, facilitated over 12 weeks by trained healthcare professionals. Interviews were conducted following completion of intervention in a purposeful sample of 15 HFpEF patients and seven caregivers.Results: Qualitative information from the facilitator interactions and interviews identified three key themes for patients and caregivers: (1) understanding their condition, (2) emotional consequences of HF, and (3) responses to the REACH-HF intervention. Fidelity analysis found the interventions to be delivered adequately with scope for improvement in caregiver engagement. The differing professional backgrounds of REACH-HF facilitators in this study demonstrate the possibility of delivery of the intervention by healthcare staff with expertise in HF, cardiac rehabilitation or both. .Conclusions: The REACH-HF home-based facilitated intervention for HFpEF appears to be a feasible and a well-accepted model for the delivery of rehabilitation, with the potential to address key unmet needs of patients and their caregivers who are often excluded from HF and current cardiac rehabilitation programmes. Results of this study will inform a recently funded full multicentre randomised clinical trial.Trial registration: ISRCTN78539530 (date registration 7th July 2015) http://www.isrctn.com/ISRCTN78539530

scholarly journals Risk Prediction Models for Patients With Acute Heart Failure: A Protocol for Systematic Review, Critical Appraisal, and Meta-Analysis

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xuecheng Zhang ◽  
Kehua Zhou ◽  
Jingjing Zhang ◽  
Ying Chen ◽  
Hengheng Dai ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Heart Failure ◽  
Systematic Review ◽  
Prediction Model ◽  
Acute Heart Failure ◽  
Risk Prediction ◽  
Methodological Quality ◽  
Critical Appraisal ◽  
Prediction Models ◽  
Cochrane Library ◽  
Risk Prediction Models

Abstract Background Nearly a third of patients with acute heart failure (AHF) die or are readmitted within three months after discharge, accounting for the majority of costs associated with heart failure-related care. A considerable number of risk prediction models, which predict outcomes for mortality and readmission rates, have been developed and validated for patients with AHF. These models could help clinicians stratify patients by risk level and improve decision making, and provide specialist care and resources directed to high-risk patients. However, clinicians sometimes reluctant to utilize these models, possibly due to their poor reliability, the variety of models, and/or the complexity of statistical methodologies. Here, we describe a protocol to systematically review extant risk prediction models. We will describe characteristics, compare performance, and critically appraise the reporting transparency and methodological quality of risk prediction models for AHF patients. Method Embase, Pubmed, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library will be searched from their inception onwards. A back word will be searched on derivation studies to find relevant external validation studies. Multivariable prognostic models used for AHF and mortality and/or readmission rate will be eligible for review. Two reviewers will conduct title and abstract screening, full-text review, and data extraction independently. Included models will be summarized qualitatively and quantitatively. We will also provide an overview of critical appraisal of the methodological quality and reporting transparency of included studies using the Prediction model Risk of Bias Assessment Tool(PROBAST tool) and the Transparent Reporting of a multivariable prediction model for Individual Prognosis or Diagnosis(TRIPOD statement). Discussion The result of the systematic review could help clinicians better understand and use the prediction models for AHF patients, as well as make standardized decisions about more precise, risk-adjusted management. Systematic review registration : PROSPERO registration number CRD42021256416.

scholarly journals Development and Pilot-Testing of a Patient Decision Aid for Left Ventricular Assist Device Placement

2016 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kristin Kostick ◽  
Estevan D. Delgado ◽  
Lidija A. Wilhelms ◽  
Courtenay R. Bruce ◽  
Jerry D. Estep ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Heart Failure ◽  
Decision Aid ◽  
Treatment Options ◽  
Left Ventricular ◽  
Assist Device ◽  
Heart Failure Treatment ◽  
Ventricular Assist ◽  
Risks And Benefits ◽  
Patient Decision ◽  
Left Ventricular Assist

Background Studies indicate suboptimal patient understanding of the capabilities, lifestyle implications, and risks of LVAD therapy. This paper describes the development methodology and pilot-testing of a decision aid for Left Ventricular Assist Device (LVAD) placement, combining traditional needs-assessment with a novel user- centered approach. Methods and Results We developed the decision aid in line with the Ottawa Decision Support Framework (ODSF) and the International Patient Decision Aids Standards (IPDAS) for ensuring quality, patient-centered content. Structured interviews were conducted with patients, caregivers, candidates for LVAD treatment, and expert clinicians (n=71) to generate content based on patient values and decisional needs, and providers’ perspectives on knowledge needs for informed consent. The aid was alpha tested through cognitive interviews (n=5) and acceptability tested with LVAD patients (n=10), candidates (n=10), and clinicians (n=13). Patients, caregivers and clinicians reported they would recommend the aid to patients considering treatment options for heart failure. Patients and caregivers agreed that the decision aid is a balanced tool presenting risks and benefits of LVAD treatment and generating discussion about aspects of heart failure treatment that matter most to patients. Conclusion We identified gaps in knowledge about heart failure treatment options, including diagnosis, decision-making, surgery, post-operative maintenance and lifestyle changes. Challenges included presenting risks and benefits for informed decision making without frightening patients and circumventing reflection, and balancing an emphasis on LVAD with other alternative treatment options like comfort- directed palliative and supportive care.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document