scholarly journals Statistical Analysis of Wind Tunnel and Atmospheric Boundary Layer Turbulent Flows

10.5772/54088 ◽  
2013 ◽  
Author(s):  
Adrian Roberto ◽  
Guilherme Sausen ◽  
Acir M.
Keyword(s):  
Boundary Layer ◽  
Statistical Analysis ◽  
Wind Tunnel ◽  
Atmospheric Boundary Layer ◽  
Turbulent Flows

A new atmospheric boundary layer wind tunnel simulation methodology for wind effects on large cooling towers considering wind environment variations

2018 ◽  
Vol 22 (5) ◽  
pp. 1194-1210 ◽  
Author(s):  
XX Cheng ◽  
X Chen ◽  
YJ Ge ◽  
H Jiang ◽  
L Zhao
Keyword(s):  
Boundary Layer ◽  
Wind Tunnel ◽  
Atmospheric Boundary Layer ◽  
Model Test ◽  
Test Results ◽  
Wind Effects ◽  
Simulation Methodology ◽  
Codes Of Practice ◽  
Wind Tunnel Simulation ◽  
Tunnel Model

The traditional atmospheric boundary layer wind tunnel model test practice employs wind fields, the flow characteristics of which are in accordance with the empirical formulae of the atmospheric turbulence presented in Codes of Practice and monographs. However, the empirical formulae presented in Codes of Practice and monographs cannot truthfully reflect the high variations of the realistic atmospheric turbulence which sometimes aggravates wind effects on structures. Based on model tests conducted in a multiple-fan actively controlled wind tunnel, it is found that most wind effects on large cooling towers change monotonically with the increase in free-stream turbulence, and the model test results are more unfavorable for a flow field of low turbulence intensity than for a flow field of high turbulence intensity with respect to the measured coherences. Thus, a new atmospheric boundary layer wind tunnel simulation methodology for wind effects on circular cylindrical structures is proposed to overcome the deficiency of the traditional atmospheric boundary layer wind tunnel model tests. The new simulation methodology includes the simulation of two realistic atmospheric boundary layer flow fields with the highest and the lowest turbulence intensities in the wind tunnel and the envelopment of model test results obtained in the two flow fields (e.g. the mean and fluctuating wind pressure distributions, the power spectral density, the coherence function, and the correlation coefficient). The superiority of the new atmospheric boundary layer wind tunnel simulation methodology over the traditional model test practice is demonstrated by comparing the model test results with the full-scale measurement data.

Development of Boundary Layer in CRIACIV in Florence (Prato) and Comparison with CFD

2016 ◽  
Vol 820 ◽  
pp. 359-364
Author(s):  
Marek Magát ◽  
Ivana Olekšáková ◽  
Juraj Žilinský
Keyword(s):  
Fluid Dynamics ◽  
Boundary Layer ◽  
Computational Fluid Dynamics ◽  
Wind Tunnel ◽  
Atmospheric Boundary Layer ◽  
Comparison Of The Results

In this article are described the results from testing profile of atmospheric boundary layer in BLWT (Boundary layer wind tunnel) in Florence (Prato), Italy with emphasis on comparison of the results with simulations in CFD (Computational fluid dynamics) software OpenFoam. The values are compared with calculated values from EuroCode.

scholarly journals Simulations of the Atmospheric Boundary Layer in a Wind Tunnel with Short Test Section

2013 ◽  
Vol 5 (3) ◽  
pp. 305-314 ◽  
Author(s):  
Luciana Bassi Marinho Pires ◽  
Igor Braga De Paula ◽  
Gilberto Fisch ◽  
Ralf Gielow ◽  
Roberto Da Mota Girardi
Keyword(s):  
Boundary Layer ◽  
Wind Tunnel ◽  
Atmospheric Boundary Layer ◽  
Test Section ◽  
Short Test

Wind effects on rough-walled and smooth-walled large cooling towers

2016 ◽  
Vol 20 (6) ◽  
pp. 843-864 ◽  
Author(s):  
XX Cheng ◽  
L Zhao ◽  
YJ Ge ◽  
R Dong ◽  
C Demartino
Keyword(s):  
Boundary Layer ◽  
Surface Roughness ◽  
Wind Tunnel ◽  
Flow Field ◽  
Atmospheric Boundary Layer ◽  
Model Test ◽  
Full Scale ◽  
Cooling Towers ◽  
Test Results ◽  
Wind Effects

Adding vertical ribs is recognized as a useful practice for reducing wind effects on cooling towers. However, ribs are rarely used on cooling towers in China since Chinese Codes are insufficient to support the design of rough-walled cooling towers, and an “understanding” hampers the use of ribs, which thinks that increased surface roughness has limited effects on the maximum internal forces that control the structural design. To this end, wind tunnel model tests in both uniform flow field with negligible free-stream turbulence and atmospheric boundary layer (ABL) turbulent flow field are carried out in this article to meticulously study and quantify the surface roughness effects on both static and dynamic wind loads for the purpose of improving Chinese Codes first. Subsequently, a further step is taken to obtain wind effects on a full-scale large cooling tower at a high Re, which are employed to validate the results obtained in the wind tunnel. Finally, the veracity of the model test results is discussed by investigating the Reynolds number (Re) effects on them. It has been proved that the model test results for atmospheric boundary layer flow field are all obtained in the range of Re-independence and the conclusions drawn from model tests and full-scale measurements basically agree, so most model test results presented in this article can be directly applied to the full-scale condition without corrections.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document