scholarly journals Fusion of Two-View Information: SVD Based Modeling for Computerized Classification of Breast Lesions on Mammograms

10.5772/30600 ◽  
2012 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rogrio Daniel ◽  
Marcelo Zanchetta do Nascimento ◽  
Ricardo de Souza Jacomini ◽  
Danilo Csar ◽  
Rodrigo Pereira
Keyword(s):  
2015 ◽  
Vol 34 (2) ◽  
pp. 652-661 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nishant Uniyal ◽  
Hani Eskandari ◽  
Purang Abolmaesumi ◽  
Samira Sojoudi ◽  
Paula Gordon ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  

2018 ◽  
Vol 21 (2) ◽  
pp. 105-118 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mattia Di Segni ◽  
Valeria de Soccio ◽  
Vito Cantisani ◽  
Giacomo Bonito ◽  
Antonello Rubini ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 45 (9) ◽  
pp. 4112-4124 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hoda Nemat ◽  
Hamid Fehri ◽  
Nasrin Ahmadinejad ◽  
Alejandro F. Frangi ◽  
Ali Gooya

2020 ◽  
Vol 93 (1112) ◽  
pp. 20200195
Author(s):  
Jiamin Pan ◽  
Wenjuan Tong ◽  
Jia Luo ◽  
Jinyu Liang ◽  
Fushun Pan ◽  
...  

Objective: To compare the efficacy of contrast-enhanced ultrasound enabled reclassification of Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (CEUS-BI-RADS) with MRI in the diagnosis of breast lesions with calcification. Methods: A total of 52 breast lesions with calcification from 51 patients were detected by ultrasound as hyperechoic foci and categorized as BI-RADS 3–5. The 51 patients further underwent CEUS scan and MRI. The ultrasound-BI-RADS combined with CEUS 5-point score system redefined the classification of BI-RADS which was called CEUS-BI-RADS. The diagnostic efficacy of three methods was assessed by receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis. Histopathological assessment used as the gold-standard. Results: The sensitivities of Ultrasound-BI-RADS, MRI classification of BI-RADS (MRI-BI-RADS) and CEUS-BI-RADS were 85%, 90% and 95% without significant difference among the three modalities (p > 0.05). The diagnostic specificities of ultrasound-BI-RADS, MRI-BI-RADS and CEUS-BI-RADS were 78.1%, 78.1% and 96.8%, respectively (p < 0.05); and the accuracy were 80.7%, 82.6% and 96.1% for ultrasound-BI-RADS, MRI-BI-RADS and CEUS-BI-RADS, respectively (p < 0.05). The area under ROC (AUROC) in differentiation of breast lesions with calcification was 0.945 for CEUS-BI-RADS, 0.907 for MRI-BI-RADS and 0.853 for ultrasound-BI-RADS, with no significant difference among the three modalities (p > 0.05). Conclusion: The CEUS-BI-RADS has a better diagnostic efficiency than MRI-BI-RADS in the differentiation of the breast lesions with calcification. Advances in knowledge: •CEUS is a better method in differentiation of breast lesions with calcification. •CEUS-BI-RADS increases the efficiency of diagnosis compared to MRI.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document