scholarly journals Non Invasive Prenatal Diagnosis of Down Syndrome

10.5772/18990 ◽  
2011 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dimitra Kappou ◽  
Eleftheria Papadopoulou ◽  
Stavros Sifakis
Keyword(s):  
Down Syndrome ◽  
Prenatal Diagnosis ◽  
Non Invasive

Author's response regarding “MeDIP-qPCR approach for non-invasive prenatal diagnosis of Down syndrome: accuracy and reproducibility”

2013 ◽  
Vol 33 (4) ◽  
pp. 404-405
Author(s):  
Elisavet A. Papageorgiou ◽  
Evdokia Tsaliki ◽  
George Koumbaris ◽  
Philippos C. Patsalis
Keyword(s):  
Down Syndrome ◽  
Prenatal Diagnosis ◽  
Non Invasive

scholarly journals Candidate epigenetic biomarkers for non-invasive prenatal diagnosis of Down syndrome

2007 ◽  
Vol 15 (2) ◽  
pp. 227-235 ◽  
Author(s):  
Robert W Old ◽  
Francesco Crea ◽  
William Puszyk ◽  
Maj Anita Hultén
Keyword(s):  
Down Syndrome ◽  
Prenatal Diagnosis ◽  
Non Invasive ◽  
Epigenetic Biomarkers

A new non-invasive prenatal diagnosis of Down syndrome through epigenetic markers and real-time qPCR

2012 ◽  
Vol 12 (sup1) ◽  
pp. S155-S161 ◽  
Author(s):  
Philippos C Patsalis ◽  
Evdokia Tsaliki ◽  
George Koumbaris ◽  
Alex Karagrigoriou ◽  
Voula Velissariou ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Down Syndrome ◽  
Prenatal Diagnosis ◽  
Real Time ◽  
Epigenetic Markers ◽  
Non Invasive ◽  
Real Time Qpcr

scholarly journals Routinization of prenatal screening with the non-invasive prenatal test: pregnant women’s perspectives

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Karuna R. M. van der Meij ◽  
Annabel Njio ◽  
Linda Martin ◽  
Janneke T. Gitsels-van der Wal ◽  
Mireille N. Bekker ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Down Syndrome ◽  
Pregnant Women ◽  
Prenatal Screening ◽  
Screening Program ◽  
Informed Choice ◽  
Aneuploidy Screening ◽  
Non Invasive ◽  
Fetal Aneuploidy ◽  
Societal Pressure ◽  
Prenatal Test

AbstractDue to the favorable test characteristics of the non-invasive prenatal test (NIPT) in the screening of fetal aneuploidy, there has been a strong and growing demand for implementation. In the Netherlands, NIPT is offered within a governmentally supported screening program as a first-tier screening test for all pregnant women (TRIDENT-2 study). However, concerns have been raised that the test’s favorable characteristics might lead to uncritical use, also referred to as routinization. This study addresses women’s perspectives on prenatal screening with NIPT by evaluating three aspects related to routinization: informed choice, freedom to choose and (personal and societal) perspectives on Down syndrome. Nationwide, a questionnaire was completed by 751 pregnant women after receiving counseling for prenatal screening. Of the respondents, the majority (75.5%) made an informed choice for prenatal screening as measured by the multidimensional measure of informed choice (MMIC). Education level and religious affiliation were significant predictors of informed choice. The main reason to accept screening was “seeking reassurance” (25.5%), and the main reason to decline was “every child is welcome” (30.6%). The majority of respondents (87.7%) did not perceive societal pressure to test. Differences between test-acceptors and test-decliners in personal and societal perspectives on Down syndrome were found. Our study revealed high rates of informed decision-making and perceived freedom to choose regarding fetal aneuploidy screening, suggesting that there is little reason for concern about routinization of NIPT based on the perspectives of Dutch pregnant women. Our findings highlight the importance of responsible implementation of NIPT within a national screening program.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document