scholarly journals GMAA: A DSS Based on the Decision Analysis Methodology - Application Survey and Further Developments

Author(s):  
Antonio Jimenez ◽  
Alfonso Mateos
1992 ◽  
Author(s):  
R.K. Wackowski ◽  
C.E. Stevens ◽  
L.O. Masoner ◽  
Vince Attanucci ◽  
J.L. Larson ◽  
...  

2009 ◽  
Vol 34 (6) ◽  
pp. 983-990 ◽  
Author(s):  
Neal C. Chen ◽  
Melissa J. Shauver ◽  
Kevin C. Chung

Water ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 11 (4) ◽  
pp. 805 ◽  
Author(s):  
Henry Amorocho-Daza ◽  
Sergio Cabrales ◽  
Raquel Santos ◽  
Juan Saldarriaga

Reliable and safe access to drinking water is necessary to ensure the economic and social sustainable development of human communities. This task requires a multi-criteria decision analysis (MCDA) methodology to select alternatives for new water supply infrastructure. These alternatives represent significant financial resources and are established for a long lifespan. To support decision-making in the context of building new water supply infrastructure, this study developed an MCDA methodology that integrates a hierarchy of non-economic benefits and the expected costs into a global index. Our methodology was implemented in the city of Santa Marta, Colombia. This city currently has a 60% drinking water shortage, and urgently needs to expand its capacity to satisfy the increasing water demand. The results of this study support the implementation of the best alternative for addressing Santa Marta’s water supply problem by considering the preferences of stakeholders.


2022 ◽  
Vol 8 ◽  
Author(s):  
Murilo R. Santos ◽  
Luis C. Dias ◽  
Maria C. Cunha ◽  
João R. Marques

This paper is a systematic review of studies that used multicriteria decision analysis (MCDA) to address plastic waste management. A literature search for scientific articles in online databases (Web of Science and Scopus) enabled us to identify 20 relevant papers from 2008 to 2021, spanning case studies in three continents. These studies focus on: plastics as a resource (material), plastics as a product (reverse logistics), and plastics as a problem (pollution). Content analysis methodology was used, with the focus being on how the authors used MCDA for managing plastic waste, which has relevance for researchers and practitioners. Alternative solutions were found for the selection of disposal methods for almost all types of plastic categorized in this review. The most popular method was AHP, followed by TOPSIS, outranking methods, MAUT/MAVT and simple weighted sums, with some studies including more than one method. The choice of criteria spanned operational (mostly), but also environmental and economic aspects to evaluate the alternatives. Less frequently, one finds criteria related to social, managerial, and political aspects. The weighting of the criteria was performed mainly by consulting experts, followed by decision makers. Representatives of the affected population or other stakeholders have been consulted only on a few occasions. The authors of the studies consider their application of MCDA was successful, highlighting mainly the importance of being able to encompass different dimensions in the evaluation of the alternatives and the transparency of the process. In most cases, a winning alternative emerged clearly, which sometimes was a combination of multiple strategies. We also report other recommendations of these authors concerning marine and terrestrial plastic waste management.


1991 ◽  
Vol 11 (4) ◽  
pp. 287-306 ◽  
Author(s):  
F.W. Schwartz ◽  
R.K. McGuire ◽  
D.B. Bullen ◽  
N. Cook ◽  
K.J. Coppersmith ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document