Is it time to abandon clinical breast examination?

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Belinda E Kiely ◽  
Annabel Goodwin
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Breast Examination ◽  
Breast Examination ◽  
Clinical Breast

Financial Anxiety is Associated With Cancer Screening Adherence in Women at High Risk of Breast Cancer

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Salene M W Jones ◽  
Tammy A Schuler ◽  
Tasleem J Padamsee ◽  
M Robyn Andersen
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Cancer Screening ◽  
High Risk ◽  
Pap Smear ◽  
Clinical Breast Examination ◽  
Lower Odds ◽  
Breast Examination ◽  
Clinical Breast ◽  
Financial Anxiety ◽  
Screening Adherence

Abstract Background Previous studies have examined the impact of material financial hardship on cancer screening but without focusing on the psychological aspects of financial hardship. Purpose This study examined the effects of different types of financial anxiety on adherence to breast cancer screening in women at high risk of breast cancer. Adherence to cervical cancer screening was also examined to determine whether associations between financial anxiety and screening adherence were unique to breast cancer screening or more general. Methods Women (n = 324) aged 30–50 and at high risk for inherited breast cancer completed a survey on general financial anxiety, worry about affording healthcare, financial stigma due to cancer risk, and adherence to cancer screening. Multivariate analyses controlled for poverty, age, and race. Results More financial anxiety was associated with lower odds of mammogram adherence (odds ratio [OR] = 0.97, confidence interval [CI] = 0.94, 0.99), Pap smear adherence (OR = 0.98, CI = 0.96, 0.996), and clinical breast examination adherence (OR = 0.98, CI = 0.96, 0.995). More worry about affording healthcare was associated with lower odds of clinical breast examination adherence (OR = 0.95, CI = 0.91, 0.9992) but not mammogram or Pap smear adherence (p > .05). Financial stigma due to cancer risk was associated with lower odds of Pap smear adherence (OR = 0.87, CI = 0.77, 0.97) but no other cancer screenings (p > .07). Conclusions Financial anxiety may impede cancer screening, even for high-risk women aware of their risk status. Clinical interventions focused on social determinants of health may also need to address financial anxiety for women at high risk of breast cancer.

Efficacy of clinical breast examination in chest-irradiated female survivors of childhood Hodgkin lymphoma (HL).

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 10028-10028
Author(s):  
Florence Lennie Wong ◽  
Janie M. Lee ◽  
Wendy M. Leisenring ◽  
Joseph Philip Neglia ◽  
Rebecca M. Howell ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Breast Examination ◽  
Female Survivors ◽  
Breast Examination ◽  
Life Years ◽  
The Us ◽  
Clinical Breast ◽  
Childhood Cancer Survivor Study ◽  
Magnetic Resonance Imaging Mri ◽  
Simulated Cohort

10028 Background: Female survivors of childhood HL treated with ≥10 Gy of chest radiation are at high risk for breast cancer (BC). The Children’s Oncology Group (COG) guidelines recommend CBE annually starting at puberty and then semiannually from age 25, plus lifetime annual mammography (MAM) and breast Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) starting 8y after chest radiation or age 25, whichever is later. While imaging-based screening recommendations are largely consistent with US guidelines for women at high BC risk, only the COG guidelines recommend CBE. The benefits of lifetime CBE starting from puberty for life in chest-irradiated HL survivors is unknown. Methods: Life-years (LYs) and lifetime BC mortality risk were estimated from a simulated cohort of 5-million HL survivors using the data from 5y female survivors of HL in the Childhood Cancer Survivor Study (CCSS) treated with ≥10 Gy of chest radiation. The simulated cohort underwent annual MAM+MRI from age 25 for life, with and without annual CBE from age 11 (presumed age of puberty) to age 24 and with and without semiannual CBE from age 25 for life with 100% adherence. BC included in-situ and invasive BC. Treatment-related BC incidence and non-BC mortality risks were estimated from the CCSS data. Risks at age <25 were extrapolated from the CCSS estimates while risks beyond age 50 were extrapolated additionally using the US population rates. CBE sensitivity (17.8%, in-situ and invasive BC) and specificity (98%) and MAM+MRI sensitivity (84.2-86.0%, in-situ; 96.7-97.1%, invasive) and specificity (75.3%) were obtained from the medical literature. Results: The CCSS cohort included 1057 female HL survivors. BC (all invasive) developed in three patients at age <25 (ages: 23, 24, 24). In the simulated cohort receiving no screening, lifetime BC risk was 40.8% and BC mortality was 17.5%. HL survivors around age 50 were at a 7.4-fold higher risk of developing BC and a 5.2-fold higher risk of non-BC mortality when compared with the general population. Compared to no annual CBE for ages 11-24y, undergoing annual CBE did not increase gains in LYs or reduce lifetime BC mortality relative to no screening (Table). Among those who survived to age ≥25, undergoing semiannual CBE from age 25 for life compared to no semiannual CBE also resulted in little gain in LYs or reduction in lifetime BC mortality relative to no screening. Conclusions: Lifetime CBE starting at puberty in conjunction with MAM+MRI appears to add little survival benefits compared with no CBE, suggesting that COG guidelines may be revised without adverse effect on long-term outcomes for chest-irradiated female survivors of childhood HL.[Table: see text]

An Augmented Reality Application for Clinical Breast Examination Training

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kuocheng Wang ◽  
Anusha Muralidharan ◽  
Jeric Cuasay ◽  
Sandhya Pruthi ◽  
Thenkurussi Kesavadas
Keyword(s):  
Augmented Reality ◽  
Clinical Breast Examination ◽  
Breast Examination ◽  
Augmented Reality Application ◽  
Clinical Breast

Estimation of the benefit and harms of including clinical breast examination in an organized breast screening program

The Breast ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 43 ◽  
pp. 105-112
Author(s):  
Huan Jiang ◽  
Stephen D. Walter ◽  
Patrick Brown ◽  
Parminder Raina ◽  
Anna M. Chiarelli
Keyword(s):  
Breast Screening ◽  
Screening Program ◽  
Clinical Breast Examination ◽  
Breast Examination ◽  
Clinical Breast

Improving the competency of medical students in clinical breast examination through a standardized simulation and multimedia-based curriculum

2018 ◽  
Vol 173 (2) ◽  
pp. 439-445 ◽  
Author(s):  
Fernando A. Angarita ◽  
Benjamin Price ◽  
Matthew Castelo ◽  
Mauricio Tawil ◽  
Juan Carlos Ayala ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Medical Students ◽  
Clinical Breast Examination ◽  
Breast Examination ◽  
Clinical Breast

scholarly journals Knowledge, Attitude and Practice toward Breast Cancer among Kurdish Women in Sulaimani Governorate/ Iraq

2017 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
pp. 20-28
Author(s):  
Bekhal Abdalwahid Amin ◽  
Muhammed Babakir-Mina ◽  
Fadhil Ahmed Mohialdeen ◽  
Mohammed I. M. Gubari
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Clinical Breast Examination ◽  
Education Level ◽  
Breast Self Examination ◽  
Attitude And Practice ◽  
Breast Examination ◽  
Clinical Breast ◽  
The Right ◽  
Self Examination ◽  
Knowledge Attitude And Practice

Breast cancer is a devastating affliction, the frequency of which is gradually increasing all over the world. Cancer may be cured if properly intervened at the right time. The correct treatment, aided by professionals and the right technology can provide critical life support to breast cancer patients. This study was conducted to assessment knowledge, attitude and practice of breast cancer among Kurdish females visited Maternity Teaching Hospital in Sulaimani. A face-to-face interview through a question¬naire to assessment of knowledge and practices toward breast cancer of 500 non-breast cancer women visited Maternity Teaching Hospital was done. Data were computerized and analyzed using Statistical Package for the Social Science (SPSS, version 22). P-value of < 0.05 was considered as statistically significant. Out of 500 participants in the current study on knowledge and practices toward breast cancer among non-breast cancer women, consequently were 227 (45.4%) and 201 (40.2%) practiced breast self-examination(BSE) and clinical breast examination respectively. In this study the participants having no symptoms and lack of knowledge about how to do BSE where regarded as the barriers of not practicing BSE (44.7%, 55.3%) respectively. The most common reason for not doing clinical breast examination (CBE) is fear of the outcome and no sign & symptom of breast cancer (28.8%, 61.9%) respectively. The high education level showed significantly more knowledge of breast self-examination and mammography than Illiterate women P≤ 0.001 and P≤ 0.03 respectively. On the other hand, the high education level women showed significantly more practice of breast self-examination P≤ 0.001. In conclusion, the present study found the facts to the inadequate knowledge of female about breast cancer and recognized the negative influence of low knowledge on the practice of BSE, CBE and mammography and the breast cancer incidence. Therefore, more determinations are needed to develop a positive attitude toward BSE, CBE and mammography screening and practice in Sulaimani.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document