scholarly journals Exploring the Role of Knowledge and Experience in Situational Judgment Test Responses Using Mixed Methods

2020 ◽  
pp. ajpe8194
Author(s):  
Michael D. Wolcott ◽  
Nikki G. Lobczowski ◽  
Jacqueline M. Zeeman ◽  
Jacqueline E. McLaughlin
Keyword(s):  
Mixed Methods ◽  
Situational Judgment Test ◽  
Situational Judgment

scholarly journals Exploring the Role of Item Scenario Features on Situational Judgment Test Response Selections

2021 ◽  
pp. 8546
Author(s):  
Michael D. Wolcott ◽  
Nikki G. Lobczowski ◽  
Jacqueline M. Zeeman ◽  
Jacqueline E. McLaughlin
Keyword(s):  
Situational Judgment Test ◽  
Situational Judgment ◽  
Test Response

Candidate reactions to a postgraduate year 1 pharmacy residency supplemental application

2022 ◽  
Author(s):  
Brent N Reed ◽  
Michael J Armahizer ◽  
Sandeep Devabhakthuni ◽  
Laura Lemens ◽  
Siu Yan A Yeung
Keyword(s):  
Academic Performance ◽  
Online Survey ◽  
Personality Test ◽  
Situational Judgment Test ◽  
Situational Judgment ◽  
Final Version ◽  
Short Answer ◽  
Curriculum Vitae ◽  
Final Article

Abstract Disclaimer In an effort to expedite the publication of articles, AJHP is posting manuscripts online as soon as possible after acceptance. Accepted manuscripts have been peer-reviewed and copyedited, but are posted online before technical formatting and author proofing. These manuscripts are not the final version of record and will be replaced with the final article (formatted per AJHP style and proofed by the authors) at a later time. Purpose The purpose of this study was to gauge postgraduate year 1 (PGY1) pharmacy residency candidates’ reactions to supplemental applications, as well as aspects specific to our process, including a personality test and situational judgment test (SJT). Methods After rank lists were submitted, applicants to our program were invited to complete an online survey. Outcomes of interest included candidates’ perceptions of relevance and fairness. Whether candidates’ attitudes differed based on the receipt of an interview offer was also assessed. Results Of 199 applicants to our program for the 2021-2022 training year, 48 applicants (24.1%) completed the survey, 15 of whom had received an interview offer. Most (64.6%) agreed that supplemental applications were useful, and nearly all (95.8%) indicated that they were willing to submit one for programs in which they were most interested. The process was seen as being fair, although ratings were higher among those who received interview offers. Most respondents believed that the personality test and SJT were relevant to the role of a resident, but attitudes towards the SJT were generally more favorable and less likely to vary according to whether candidates received an interview offer. Candidates believed that the personality test and SJT were not as representative of them as letters of reference or their curriculum vitae, but perceptions of academic performance varied. Conclusion Applicants responded positively to our supplemental application and indicated that they would be willing to complete one for programs of interest. These findings should help assuage concerns about the use of supplemental applications, particularly when short-answer or essay formats are avoided.

The Team Role Test: Development and validation of a team role knowledge situational judgment test.

2008 ◽  
Vol 93 (2) ◽  
pp. 250-267 ◽  
Author(s):  
Troy V. Mumford ◽  
Chad H. Van Iddekinge ◽  
Frederick P. Morgeson ◽  
Michael A. Campion
Keyword(s):  
Test Development ◽  
Situational Judgment Test ◽  
Situational Judgment ◽  
Development And Validation

Development of a Situational Judgment Test to Predict Unethical Behavior

2012 ◽  
Author(s):  
Janneke K. Oostrom ◽  
Henk T. Van der Molen ◽  
Alec W. Serlie ◽  
Marise Ph. Born
Keyword(s):  
Unethical Behavior ◽  
Situational Judgment Test ◽  
Situational Judgment

SME trait effectiveness disagreement in situational judgment test scoring

2007 ◽  
Author(s):  
Laura G. Barron ◽  
Stephan J. Motowidlo ◽  
Margaret E. Beier ◽  
Tracy Kantrowitz ◽  
Courtney L. Holladay ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Situational Judgment Test ◽  
Situational Judgment ◽  
Test Scoring

The Role of Social Support in Concussion Disclosure in United States Air Force Academy Cadets: A Mixed Methods Approach

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michelle L Weber Rawlins ◽  
Brian R Johnson ◽  
Emily R Jones ◽  
Johna K Register-Mihalik ◽  
Craig Foster ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
United States ◽  
Social Support ◽  
Mixed Methods ◽  
Air Force ◽  
Medical Staff ◽  
United States Air Force ◽  
Medical Attention ◽  
Air Force Academy ◽  
Mixed Methods Approach

ABSTRACT Introduction United States Air Force Academy (USAFA) cadets are at risk for sustaining concussions; however, several factors inhibit disclosure. We aimed to better understand the role of social support in concussion disclosure. Methods and Materials We used a mixed methods approach with an electronic survey and interviews. The survey used a 9-point Likert scale (1 = strongly disagree and 9 = strongly agree) to assess concussion disclosure. Survey items asked cadets whom they felt most comfortable disclosing a concussion or bell-ringer/ding to, how quickly they would seek medical attention for a suspected concussion or bell-ringer/ding, whether cadets would be generally supportive/unsupportive of another cadet disclosing a concussion to medical staff, and whether other cadets important to them would be generally supportive/unsupportive if they reported a concussion to medical staff. Two multivariate linear regressions, one for concussion and one for bell-ringers/dings, were calculated to determine whether cadet choice of the person they felt most comfortable disclosing a concussion or bell-ringer/ding to predicted whether they would immediately seek medical attention for either condition. Choice of person included Air Officer Commanding (AOC)/Academy Military Trainer (AMT), upper classmen, cadet who had recovered from a concussion, cadet, closest friend, teammate, and squadmate. Descriptive analyses assessed whether cadets felt supported or unsupported by other cadets and by those who were important to them concerning concussion reporting. Thirty-four semi-structured interviews were conducted with cadets to explore their views on concussion disclosure. Results Increased comfort with disclosing a suspected concussion to an AOC/AMT had higher agreement seeking medical attention (β = 0.28, P < .001). For every 1-point increase in being comfortable disclosing a potential bell-ringer/ding to an AOC/AMT (β = 0.272, P < .001), squadmate (β = 0.241, P = .002), and teammate (β = −0.182, P = .035), agreement for seeking medical attention immediately increased 0.27, increased 0.24, and decreased 0.18, respectively. Interviews indicated cadets would often speak to a peer before seeking medical attention. Conclusions Our results suggested that cadets felt comfortable reporting a suspected concussion or bell-ringer/ding to various peers and that those peers would be supportive of that choice, indicating social support. Future interventions should include educating cadets that peers may come to them, especially if they are AOCs/AMTs or squadmates.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document