scholarly journals Pharmacy Student Impact on Inappropriate Prescribing of Acid Suppressive Therapy

2011 ◽  
Vol 75 (9) ◽  
pp. 175 ◽  
Author(s):  
Katherine M. Carey ◽  
Jason E. Cross ◽  
Matthew A. Silva ◽  
Mihaela S. Stefan ◽  
Michael B. Rothberg
Keyword(s):  
Inappropriate Prescribing ◽  
Pharmacy Student ◽  
Suppressive Therapy ◽  
Student Impact

Evaluation of Continuation of Stress Ulcer Prophylaxis at Hospital Discharge

2009 ◽  
Vol 44 (10) ◽  
pp. 888-893 ◽  
Author(s):  
William R. Judd ◽  
George A. Davis ◽  
P. Shane Winstead ◽  
Douglas T. Steinke ◽  
Timothy M. Clifford ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Health Care ◽  
Adverse Events ◽  
Hospital Admission ◽  
Drug Interactions ◽  
Stress Ulcer ◽  
Inappropriate Prescribing ◽  
Health Care Expenditures ◽  
Stress Ulcer Prophylaxis ◽  
Suppressive Therapy ◽  
Ulcer Prophylaxis

Purpose Stress-related mucosal disease (SRMD) can adversely affect patient morbidity and mortality. The use of stress ulcer prophylaxis (SUP) in patients with no risk factors for clinically important bleeding, however, is contributing to health care-related adverse events, drug interactions, and costs. The objective was to determine the percentage of hospitalized patients who receive SUP without an approved indication and to evaluate the financial impact of inappropriate prescribing as well as the risk for significant drug-drug interactions. Methods A retrospective chart review was performed of hospitalized adult cardiology, family medicine, and internal medicine patients between July 1, 2006 and June 30, 2007. Prescribing of acid suppressive therapy (AST) during hospital admission and indications for SUP were evaluated. Concomitant medications, cost of therapy, and discharge medications were assessed as secondary outcomes. Results Of the 4,603 patients admitted during the study period, 418 were randomly selected for study inclusion. Approximately 53% (221/418) of the selected patients received SUP during hospital admission, 93% (206/221) of whom had no indication for prophylaxis. Of those who continued AST at discharge (14%; 31/221), 84% (26/31) had no approved indication. Overuse of SUP resulted in 77 potential drug-drug interactions and an estimated 30-day outpatient cost of $37,950 for patients receiving these medications at discharge. Conclusion SUP is frequently prescribed to non–critically ill patients when the risk of SRMD is low. Use of SUP for patients who do not meet evidence-based criteria appears to contribute to increased health care expenditures, potential adverse events, and drug interactions.

Is the basal TSH level a reliable parameter for monitoring suppressive therapy in patients with thyroid carcinoma?

1988 ◽  
Vol 117 (4_Suppl) ◽  
pp. S10-S11
Author(s):  
R. MÜLLER ◽  
W. KANITZ ◽  
H. VOGT ◽  
P. HEIDENREICH
Keyword(s):  
Thyroid Carcinoma ◽  
Suppressive Therapy ◽  
Reliable Parameter

Bone mineral density and bone turnover markers in patients with thyroid cancer and L-T4 suppressive therapy after 25 years of follow-up

2014 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mingo Dominguez Maria Luisa de ◽  
Sonsoles Guadalix Iglesias ◽  
Maria Begona Lopez Alvarez ◽  
Guillermo Martinez Diaz-Guerra ◽  
Federico Hawkins Carranza
Keyword(s):  
Bone Mineral Density ◽  
Thyroid Cancer ◽  
Bone Turnover ◽  
Bone Mineral ◽  
Bone Turnover Markers ◽  
Suppressive Therapy ◽  
Mineral Density ◽  
Turnover Markers

Evaluation of Drug Utilization Pattern Using WHO Prescribing Indicators in Endodontic Department at a Tertiary Hospital in Eastern Nepal

2020 ◽  
Vol 5 (3) ◽  
pp. 1191-1195
Author(s):  
Sushmita Shrestha ◽  
Navin Agrawal ◽  
Deependra Prasad Sarraf
Keyword(s):  
Drug Utilization ◽  
Inappropriate Prescribing ◽  
Systemic Infection ◽  
Tertiary Hospital ◽  
World Health ◽  
Utilization Pattern ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
Prescribing Indicators ◽  
Essential Drug List ◽  
Dental Practitioners

Introduction: Irrational or inappropriate prescribing practice is common in developing countries that can lead to ineffective treatment, prolonged hospitalization, harm to the patient, increased treatment cost and development of drug-resistant organisms. The prescription of antibiotics and other drugs in endodontics is limited to patients with progressive and diffuse swelling and with systemic infection. However, antibiotics continue to be over-prescribed by more than 66% dentists without a rational justification.Therefore, the periodic assessment of drug utilization pattern is important to know the existing pattern of drug use, decrease adverse effects and provide feedback to the prescribers. Objective: To evaluate the drug utilization pattern in endodontics using the World Health Organization prescribing indicators. Methodology: A cross-sectional prospective study was conducted among the patients visiting the outpatient department of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics. After obtaining the informed consent, the relevant data were collected on a self-designed proforma by reviewing the health cards of the patients. The WHO prescribing indicators were calculated. Descriptive statistics were calculated using SPSS version 11.0. Results: Out of 187 patients, 101 (54%) were female. Mean age was 38.9±16.6 years. Majority of the patients suffered from acute apical periodontitis (30.5%). A total of 281 drugs were prescribed to 187 patients. Paracetamol+Ibuprofen (44.1%) was the most frequently prescribed drugs. Most of the patients were prescribed one drug (78.6%).  Average drug per prescription was 1.5. Majority of the drugs (89.0%) were prescribed from Essential drug list of Nepal. Conclusions: Analgesics were the most frequently prescribed drug. The prescription practice was rational. There is need to increase the number of medicine prescribed from National List of Essential medicines.Educational initiatives should be undertaken to further strengthen the rational prescription among dental practitioners.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document