scholarly journals Nonpharmacological Treatments of Insomnia for Long-Term Painful Conditions: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Patient-Reported Outcomes in Randomized Controlled Trials

SLEEP ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 38 (11) ◽  
pp. 1751-1764 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nicole K.Y. Tang ◽  
S. Tanya Lereya ◽  
Hayley Boulton ◽  
Michelle A. Miller ◽  
Dieter Wolke ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Randomized Controlled Trials ◽  
Patient Reported Outcomes ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Controlled Trials ◽  
Randomized Controlled ◽  
Patient Reported ◽  
Nonpharmacological Treatments

Safety and Effectiveness of Long-Term Exercise Interventions in Older Adults: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

2020 ◽  
Vol 50 (6) ◽  
pp. 1095-1106 ◽  
Author(s):  
Antonio García-Hermoso ◽  
Robinson Ramirez-Vélez ◽  
Mikel L. Sáez de Asteasu ◽  
Nicolás Martínez-Velilla ◽  
Fabricio Zambom-Ferraresi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Older Adults ◽  
Randomized Controlled Trials ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Controlled Trials ◽  
Exercise Interventions ◽  
Randomized Controlled

Intranasal Azelastine and Fluticasone as Combination Therapy for Allergic Rhinitis: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

2019 ◽  
Vol 161 (3) ◽  
pp. 412-418
Author(s):  
Peter M. Debbaneh ◽  
Anna K. Bareiss ◽  
Sarah K. Wise ◽  
Edward D. McCoul
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Allergic Rhinitis ◽  
Combination Therapy ◽  
Randomized Controlled Trials ◽  
Nasal Spray ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Controlled Trials ◽  
Randomized Controlled ◽  
Patient Reported ◽  
Symptom Scores

Objective Combination therapy with intranasal azelastine and fluticasone propionate is an option for treatment of allergic rhinitis. This systematic review and meta-analysis examines existing literature to determine efficacy in treating allergic rhinitis compared to monotherapy. Data Sources The PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane, and MEDLINE databases were systematically searched for randomized controlled trials using AzeFlu nasal spray. Review Methods Randomized, controlled trials that reported symptom relief of allergic rhinitis in males and females of all ages were included. Results were reported in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) standard. Results Systematic review identified 8 articles suitable for review. The risk of bias was generally low. All studies exhibited a greater decrease in patient-reported symptom scores in patients treated with combination therapy compared to monotherapy or placebo. Meta-analysis revealed superiority of combination therapy in reducing Total Nasal Symptom Score compared to placebo (mean change from baseline: −2.41; 95% confidence interval [CI], −2.82 to −1.99; P < .001; I 2 = 60%), azelastine (mean change from baseline: −1.40; 95% CI, −1.82 to −0.98; P < .001; I 2 = 0%), and fluticasone (mean change from baseline: −0.74; 95% CI, −1.17 to −0.31; P < .001; I 2 = 12%). Conclusion Current evidence supports both efficacy and superiority of combination intranasal azelastine and fluticasone in reducing patient-reported symptom scores in patients with allergic rhinitis. Combination nasal spray should be considered as second-line therapy in patients with allergic rhinitis that is not controlled with monotherapy.

Effects of transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) in people with knee osteoarthritis: A systematic review and meta-analysis

2021 ◽  
pp. 026921552110656
Author(s):  
Yu Wu ◽  
Feilong Zhu ◽  
Wei Chen ◽  
Ming Zhang
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Knee Osteoarthritis ◽  
Randomized Controlled Trials ◽  
Nerve Stimulation ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Controlled Trials ◽  
Walking Ability ◽  
Medium Term ◽  
Randomized Controlled

Objective To evaluate the effects of Transcutaneous Electric Nerve Stimulation (TENS) on pain, function, walking ability and stiffness in people with Knee osteoarthritis (KOA). Design Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Methods We searched MEDLINE, EMBASE, PubMed, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Physiotherapy Evidence Database (PEDro), clinicaltrials.gov and Web of Science (last search November 2021) for randomized controlled trials. The Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool was used for the included studies, and Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluations (GRADE) was used to interpret the certainty of results. Standardized Mean Differences (SMDs) and 95% confidence interval (CI) were calculated for meta-analysis. Results Twenty-nine studies were found (1398 people, age range 54-85, 74% are female) and fourteen were included in this review. Intervention duration was divided as short term (immediately after intervention), medium term (<four weeks) and long term (≥ four weeks). Active TENS showed greater improvement in Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) than sham TENS.Combining TENS with other interventions produced superior outcomes compared with other interventions for VAS in all the terms. In the meanwhile, TENS combined with other interventions was superior to other interventions for the pain subgroup of Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Arthritis Index in the medium term and long term. TENS combined with other interventions was superior to other interventions for function in the medium term and long term. Conclusion TENS could significantly relieve pain, decrease dysfunction and improve walking ability in people with KOA, but it is not effective for stiffness.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document