scholarly journals Comparison Between Phylogenetic Relationships Based on 18S rDNA Sequences and Growth by Salinity of Chlorella-like Species (Chlorophyta)

2012 ◽  
Vol 15 (2) ◽  
pp. 125-135 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hye-Jung Lee ◽  
Sung-Bum Hur
Keyword(s):  
Phylogenetic Relationships ◽  
18S Rdna ◽  
Rdna Sequences ◽  
18S Rdna Sequences

Phylogenetic Relationships among Turbellarian Orders Inferred from 18S rDNA Sequences

1996 ◽  
Vol 13 (5) ◽  
pp. 747-756 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tomoe Katayama ◽  
Megumi Nishioka ◽  
Masamichi Yamamoto
Keyword(s):  
Phylogenetic Relationships ◽  
18S Rdna ◽  
Rdna Sequences ◽  
18S Rdna Sequences

Molecular Phylogenetic Relationships Among Angiosperms: An Overview Based on rbcL and 18S rDNA Sequences

1997 ◽  
pp. 157-178 ◽  
Author(s):  
Douglas E. Soltis ◽  
Carola Hibsch-Jetter ◽  
Pamela S. Soltis ◽  
Mark W. Chase ◽  
James S. Farris
Keyword(s):  
Phylogenetic Relationships ◽  
18S Rdna ◽  
Rdna Sequences ◽  
Molecular Phylogenetic ◽  
18S Rdna Sequences

Phylogenetic relationships in the Gracilariales (Rhodophyta) as determined by 18S rDNA sequences

Phycologia ◽  
1992 ◽  
Vol 31 (6) ◽  
pp. 510-522 ◽  
Author(s):  
C. J. Bird ◽  
E. L. Rice ◽  
C. A. Murphy ◽  
M. A. Ragan
Keyword(s):  
Phylogenetic Relationships ◽  
18S Rdna ◽  
Rdna Sequences ◽  
18S Rdna Sequences

Phylogenetic relationships of the family Sphaeromatidae Latreille, 1825 (Crustacea: Peracarida: Isopoda) within Sphaeromatidea based on 18S-rDNA molecular data

Zootaxa ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 3599 (2) ◽  
pp. 161-177 ◽  
Author(s):  
REGINA WETZER ◽  
MARCOS PÉREZ-LOSADA ◽  
NIEL L. BRUCE
Keyword(s):  
Phylogenetic Relationships ◽  
18S Rdna ◽  
Molecular Data ◽  
Sister Taxon ◽  
Taxon Sampling ◽  
Rdna Sequences ◽  
The Family ◽  
History Of ◽  
18S Rdna Sequences

Based on 18S-rDNA sequences of 97 isopods including 18 Sphaeromatidea, we show Sphaeromatidae, Valvifera, Serolidae, and Ancinidae is a well supported clade. The within clade relationships of these taxa are not as definitively demonstrated because taxon sampling for some groups is still limited. In our analyses the Sphaeromatidae are shown to be unequivocally monophyletic. This is contrary to the morphology-based analysis by A. Brandt and G. Poore in 2003, which included only five Sphaeromatidae and found the family to be paraphyletic. The Ancinidae are also upheld, and the Valvifera is the sister taxon to Serolidae. Surprisingly Plakarthrium (Plakarthiidae) is nested within the Sphaeromatidae in most analyses. We point out short-comings in our sampling and suggest areas which would benefit from better sampling. We also review the long and convoluted nomenclatural history of the Sphaeromatidea, Sphaeromatoidea, and Sphaeromatidae.

Estimation of phylogenetic relationships within the Ascomycota on the basis of 18S rDNA sequences and chemotaxonomy

2005 ◽  
Vol 4 (3) ◽  
pp. 205-214 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ksenija Lopandic ◽  
Orsolya Molnár ◽  
Motofumi Suzuki ◽  
Wilhelm Pinsker ◽  
Hansjörg Prillinger
Keyword(s):  
Phylogenetic Relationships ◽  
18S Rdna ◽  
Rdna Sequences ◽  
18S Rdna Sequences
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document