scholarly journals A Case of Anticancer Drug Treatment on Testicular Tumor of Hemophiliac Patient

2020 ◽  
Vol 46 (10) ◽  
pp. 593-599
Author(s):  
Toshiyasu Tsujii ◽  
Masahiro Nakashima ◽  
Yuiko Kamo ◽  
Hisaha Yasufuku ◽  
Honoka Yamagata ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Drug Treatment ◽  
Anticancer Drug ◽  
Testicular Tumor ◽  
Hemophiliac Patient

scholarly journals POS0291 THE IMPACT OF DRUG INDUCED AND OTHER RHEUMATIC MUSCULOSKELETAL DISORDERS (MD) ON THE QUALITY OF LIFE (QOL) OF CANCER PATIENTS RECEIVED ANTICANCER DRUG TREATMENT

2021 ◽  
Vol 80 (Suppl 1) ◽  
pp. 371.1-371
Author(s):  
A. Koltakova ◽  
A. Lila ◽  
L. P. Ananyeva ◽  
A. Fedenko
Keyword(s):  
Drug Treatment ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Anticancer Drug ◽  
Physical Functioning ◽  
Role Functioning ◽  
Drug Induced ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Eortc Qlq C30 ◽  
Eortc Qlq ◽  
The Impact

Background:Pts with cancer may have MD that can be caused by neoplastic/paraneoplastic disease, rheumatic diseases or be induced by anticancer drug treatment. There is no data about MD influence on the QoL of cancer patients. The EORTC QoL questionnaire (QLQ)-C30 is a valid questionnaire designed to assess different aspects (Global health (GH), Functional (FS) and symptoms (SS) scales) that define the QoL of cancer patients [1].Objectives:The objective of the study was to assess the impact of drug induced and other types of MD on the QoL of cancer patients that received anticancer drug treatment by using of EORTC QLQ-C30 v3.0.Methods:The sampling of 123 pts (M/F – 40/83; mean age 54.4±12.8) with breast (32,5%), gastrointestinal (17%), ovary (8%), lung (7%) and other cancer was observed by rheumatologist in the oncology outpatient clinic. All pts received anticancer drug treatment: chemotherapy (104 pts), target therapy (16 pts) checkpoint-inhibitors (14 pts), hormone therapy (13 pts) in different combinations. 102(82.9%) of 123pts had MD include arthritis (12 pts), synovitis (5 pts), arthralgia (66 pts), periarthritis (34 pts), osteodynia (13 pts). There were 58 pts (group 1; M/F – 14/44; mean age 52.5±12.2) with anticancer drug treatment induced MD and 44 pts (group 2; M/F – 16/27; mean age 57.6±13.5) with other type of MD include 26 pts with skeletal metastasis. The were 21 pts (group 3; M/F – 10/11; mean age 52.9±11.1) without MD. All pts fulfilled EORTC QLQ-C30 v3.0 (tab.1).Table 1.The median [Q1;Q3] of results of GH, SS and SS of EORTC QLQ-C30ScaleSubscaleGroup1Group2Group3GH58.3[50;58]58.3[41.7;83.3]50[50;66.7]FS*Physical functioning73.3[60;86.7]73.3[66.7;86.7]86.7[80;93]Role functioning66.7[66.7;100]83.3[50;100]100[83;100]Emotional functioning83.3[66.7;100]75[66.7;91.7]91.6[83.3;100]Social functioning83.3[66.7;100]83.3[50;100]100[83.3;100]SS*Pain33.3[0;50]16.7[0;33.3]0[0;16.7]*There are only the scores that had got a statistical difference between the groups.Kruskal-Wallis H and post-hoc (Dwass-Steel-Critchlow-Fligner (DSCF) pairwise comparisons) tests for data analysis were performed.Results:A Kruskal-Wallis H test has shown a statistically significant difference in physical (χ2(2)=7.54; p=0.023), role (χ2(2)=9.87; p=0.007), emotion (χ2(2)=7.69; p=0.021) functioning and pain (χ2(2)=8.44; p=0.015) scores between the different groups. A post-hoc test with DSCF pairwise comparisons of median has shown a statistically significant difference between 1 and 3 groups (W=3.904; p=0.016) for physical functioning, between 2 and 3 groups (W=3.35; p=0.004) for role functioning, between 2 and 3 groups (W=4.03; p=0.012) for emotional functioning, between 1 and 3 groups (W=-3.97; p=0.014) for pain scale.Conclusion:The study has shown that MD associated with anticancer drug treatment adversely affected the QoL of cancer patients received anticancer drug treatment by reducing a physical functioning and by increasing pain scores. Presence of other types of MD adversely affect the QoL by reducing emotional and role functioning.References:[1]Aaronson NK,et al.The European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer QLQ-C30: a quality-of-life instrument for use in international clinical trials in oncology. J Natl Cancer Inst.1993;85(5):365-376. doi:10.1093/jnci/85.5.365Disclosure of Interests:None declared

scholarly journals Developing Exposure/Response Models for Anticancer Drug Treatment: Special Considerations

2015 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
pp. 12-27 ◽  
Author(s):  
DR Mould ◽  
A‐C Walz ◽  
T Lave ◽  
JP Gibbs ◽  
B Frame
Keyword(s):  
Drug Treatment ◽  
Anticancer Drug ◽  
Response Models ◽  
Exposure Response

scholarly journals Key issues of patient safety during anticancer drug treatment in a day hospital and outpatient setting

2021 ◽  
Vol 16 (4) ◽  
pp. 90-99
Author(s):  
A. A. Fedenko ◽  
A. A. Kolomeytseva ◽  
V. O. Artemova
Keyword(s):  
Drug Treatment ◽  
Anticancer Drug ◽  
Treatment Process ◽  
Central Venous Access ◽  
Medical Personnel ◽  
Venous Access ◽  
Outpatient Setting ◽  
Cochrane Library ◽  
Day Hospital ◽  
Main Components

Background. In the context of the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic, the vector of healthcare development is aimed at minimizing contacts among citizens, which is especially important for cancer patients, given the immunosuppression caused by cytostatics.The objective of the review is to present the development prospects of hospital-substituting technologies for drug antitumor treatment. Two main components are considered that allow effective and safe infusion of anticancer drugs in a day hospital: central venous access devices and infusion pumps, various types of these devices, their safety and experience of use today are described.Materials and methods. We searched for available literature published in PubMed, Medline, eLIBRARY, Cochrane Library, CyberLeninka, Global.health, etc. 42 sources were found and analyzed, published from 2002 to 2021.Results. Outpatient anticancer drug treatment is a real alternative to hospital stay, based on many years of world experience. The qualifications level of medical personnel involved in the treatment process should allow early monitoring of various adverse events development. With the ongoing COVID-19 pandemic, it is important to ensure the continuity of the treatment process while minimizing risks to the patient.Conclusion. With a careful approach and adequate infrastructure availability, drug treatment in a day hospital can reduce the burden on round-the-clock stay hospital and positively affect the patients’ quality of life and their compliance with treatment.

scholarly journals Behavior and the Response of Cancer Cells on Anticancer Drug Treatment Monitored with Microelectrode Array

2015 ◽  
Vol 120 ◽  
pp. 928-931 ◽  
Author(s):  
T. Anh-Nguyen ◽  
D.T. Tran ◽  
U. Pliquett ◽  
G.A. Urban
Keyword(s):  
Drug Treatment ◽  
Cancer Cells ◽  
Anticancer Drug ◽  
Microelectrode Array

Targeting autophagy for the treatment of cancer

2018 ◽  
Vol 399 (7) ◽  
pp. 673-677 ◽  
Author(s):  
Simone Fulda
Keyword(s):  
Cell Death ◽  
Drug Treatment ◽  
Cell Survival ◽  
Cancer Cell ◽  
Anticancer Drug ◽  
Autophagic Cell Death ◽  
Eukaryotic Cells ◽  
Drug Induced ◽  
Cancer Cell Survival ◽  
Catabolic Process

Abstract Macroautophagy (herein termed autophagy) is evolutionarily highly conserved across eukaryotic cells and represents an intracellular catabolic process that targets damaged macromolecules and organelles for degradation. Autophagy is dysregulated in various human diseases including cancer. In addition, many drugs currently used for the treatment of cancer can engage autophagy, which typically promotes cancer cell survival by mitigating cellular stress. However, under certain circumstances activation of autophagy upon anticancer drug treatment can also trigger a lethal type of autophagy termed autophagic cell death (ACD). This may pave new avenues for exploiting the autophagic circuitry in oncology. This review presents the concept and some examples of anticancer drug-induced ACD.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document