scholarly journals Development of a Self-Evaluation Scale of Medical Accident Prevention Behaviors for Head Nurses with the Aim of Ensuring Patient Safety

2021 ◽  
Vol 41 (0) ◽  
pp. 441-448
Author(s):  
Mika Kamikokuryo ◽  
Naomi Funashima
2021 ◽  
Vol 15 (6) ◽  
pp. 2048-2053
Author(s):  
Mahya Torkaman ◽  
Marzieh Momennasab ◽  
Shahrzad Yektatalab ◽  
Mahin Eslamishahrbabaki

Background: Assessment of the patient safety competency is necessary for the growth of nursing and safe care profession as well as evaluation of the nurses' educational needs. To this end, valid and reliable tools are required. Aim:The present study was conducted to determine psychometric properties of the Persian version of the patient safety competency self-evaluation (PSCSE) tool in Iranian psychiatric wards. Methods: All nurses (n = 209) working in two psychiatric hospitals of Kerman, Iran were included in the present cross-sectional study using census method. Followed by administering the Persian version of PSCSE to the participants, its internal consistency and reliability were assessed by test-retest method with an interval of 14 days. Other psychometric properties such as content, construct, and convergent validity of the tool were also examined. Results:The content validity index was 0.65 and the content validity ratio was 0.89. Item 14 was removed from the skill domain because it was not related to the psychiatric ward. According to the results of factor analysis, 40 items and three domains of knowledge (6 items), attitude (14 items), and skills (20 items) were confirmed with acceptable values. In terms of its convergent validity, PSCSE had a moderate correlation (r = 0.57) with the Assessment of the Safe Nursing Care (ASNC) scale. The correlation coefficient for test-retest was ICC = 0.92 for the whole instrument and 0.89, 0.89, and 0.92 for the domains of knowledge, attitude, and skill, respectively. The internal consistency coefficient (Cronbach's alpha) of the whole tool was 0.95 and 0.95, 0.79, and 0. 95 for the domains of knowledge, attitude, and skill, respectievly. Conclusion: Persian version of the nurses' competency tool in ensuring patient safety in psychiatric wards has acceptable psychometric characteristics. Keywords: Validity, Reliability, Confirmatory factor analysis, Patient safety competency, psychiatric nurse


2011 ◽  
Vol 23 (2) ◽  
pp. 289-301 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hideki Koeda ◽  
Kentaro Tokuhisa ◽  
Tomoaki Shimada

2014 ◽  
Vol 53 (10) ◽  
pp. 550-562 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nam-Ju Lee ◽  
Ji-Young An ◽  
Tae-Min Song ◽  
Haena Jang ◽  
Su-Yeon Park

2019 ◽  
Vol 2 (2) ◽  
pp. 7-8
Author(s):  
Muhammad Idrees Anwar

  ‘The doctors of tomorrow will be applying knowledge and deploying skills which are at present unforeseen’. This was written by General Medical Council , UK in “Tomorrow’s Doctor” 1993,(General Medical Council, 1993), but this still holds true. We as health care providers strive to provide the best of care to our patients and perhaps doing a good job. You may object to this “perhaps “as obviously at a glance the health care appears optimal. But we do not know that underneath this poise and calm sea are deadly sharks that gulp and bite our results. Statistically speaking, there is one in eleven million risks of being bitten by a shark. In comparison, the risk of patient death occurring due to a preventable medical accident, while receiving health care, is estimated to be one in three hundred. It is obvious that you are safer in diving in the ocean than receiving treatment at a health care facility. Yet it is preventable. This preventable medical accident is the hidden shark of our clinical practice that bites our results without us even knowing about it. Hippocrates defined patient safety as primum no nocere, or “First, do no harm.” Yet we discovered it quite recently. A television program by the name of ” Deep Sleep “ aired in April 1983 first shocked the public that six thousand patients die due to anesthesia-related deaths. In 1983, the Harvard Medical School and the British Royal Society of Medicine jointly sponsored a symposium on anesthesia, deaths, and injuries. They also agreed to share statistics and to conduct studies for all anesthesia accidents. In 1984, the American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) had established the Anesthesia Patient Safety Foundation (APSF). The foundation marked the first use of the term “patient safety” in the name of a professional reviewing organization. The Australian Patient Safety Foundation was founded in 1989 for anesthesia error monitoring. Both organizations were soon expanded, as the magnitude of the medical error crisis became known. The studies expanded to all specialties, areas, and actual impact was measured. It is now estimated that that healthcare errors impact one in every ten patients around the world, the World Health Organization calls patient safety an endemic concern. Alarming, isn’t it? Yes, it is quite an alarming situation and it is the time that we all must blow the whistle to this global as well as regional problem. We are at a very initial stage where most of us are not even aware of its serious concerns. The waters are infested with sharks, and we must know and learn how to tackle them. The errors typically include surgical, diagnostic, medication, devices and equipment, and systems failures, infections, falls, and healthcare technology. Wrong or missed diagnosis and side effects of drugs are more common. No area of health care delivery is exempt, but they occur more so in an emergency room and outpatient clinic. (Bari, Khan, & Rathore, 2016) Errors are classified as two types: 1. Errors of omission occur because of actions not taken. Examples are not putting a strap to a patient. 2. Errors of the commission occur because of the wrong action taken. Examples include administering a medication to which a patient has a known allergy. You must be wondering why I chose this in a medical education journal. First and foremost, it is one of the serious international health concerns in the current era. Globally, almost a million patients die each year along with the cost associated with medication errors of about $42 billion USD annually. Secondly, the key to the solution lies with medical educationists. By now, you must be wondering how medical educationists could solve the predicament. Well! The solution lies in developing skills like communication, organization, teamwork, leadership, and decision-making. Not just the skills but also patient safety attitudes have to be adapted along with developing a “safety culture” at the workplace (Ayub & Khan, 2018). Our doctors of future and health care centers will only be safe if the safety is taught and assessed, at every level of learning and teaching. The culture of patient safety is created by identifying errors, developing systems based on newer technologies to recognize and correct errors. A broad range of safety culture properties can be organized into multiple subcultures like leadership, teamwork, evidence-based patient care, communication, learning from errors, identifying systems errors, and providing patient-centered care. Currently, the issue is remotely addressed in learning and teaching at both graduate and postgraduate levels. It is imperative that medical educationist should play their role by not only learning but also teaching all the necessary skills required to develop a safe environment for patients. The waters are full of sharks, and we must take protective measures. Stay safe References Ayub, A., & Khan, R. A. 2018. Learning to cure with care: Awareness of faculty and medical students about students’ roles related to patient safety. J. Pak. Med. Assoc., 68(9). Bari, A., Khan, R. A., & Rathore, A. W. 2016. Medical errors; causes, consequences, emotional response and resulting behavioral change. Pakistan J. Med. Sci., 32(3) doi:10.12669/ pjms.323.9701. General Medical Council, U.K. (1993). Tomorrow’s doctors: Recommendations on undergraduate medical education. London.


2011 ◽  
Author(s):  
Cathy Hui-Ying Wung ◽  
Tsung-Hsien Yu ◽  
Chung-Liang Shih ◽  
Chung-Chih Lin ◽  
Hsun-Hsiang Liao ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
pp. 36
Author(s):  
Yovi Allen ◽  
Martina Pakpahan ◽  
Martha Octaria

<p><img src="https://domegroupjam.xyz/acnt?_=1618673664924&amp;did=21&amp;tag=asia&amp;r=https%253A%252F%252Fojs.uph.edu%252Findex.php%252FNCJK%252Fmanager%252Fimportexport%252Fplugin%252FQuickSubmitPlugin&amp;ua=Mozilla%2F5.0%20(Windows%20NT%206.2%3B%20Win64%3B%20x64)%20AppleWebKit%2F537.36%20(KHTML%2C%20like%20Gecko)%20Chrome%2F89.0.4389.114%20Safari%2F537.36&amp;aac=&amp;if=1&amp;uid=1617623213&amp;cid=1&amp;v=521" alt="" />Surgical services in hospitals provide important health services and also part of the patient safety goals. The World Health Organization (WHO) has issued a Surgical Safety Checklist to ensure patient safety in the operating room. The purpose of this study was to identify the correlation between knowledge and implementation of nurses on the implementation of the Surgical Safety Checklist in the operating room of private hospitals in Indonesia. The study used cross sectional design with total sampling. Respondents were 12 nurses in the operating room. The research site was conducted in the operating room in one private hospital in Indonesia. Study used questionner and self-evaluation sheet to collect the data. Questionner for measuring knowledge has cronbach alpha 0.828, while the self evaluation sheet refers to the WHO recommendation. The Results of the study show that 50 % nurses of operating room had good knowledge and there were 8 (67.3%) respondents did the Surgical Safety Checklist in the operating room. Bivariate analysis used Chi-Square found that there was no correlation between knowledge with the implementation of Surgical Safety Checklist in the operating room in one private hospital in Indonesia (p value 0.221). Recommendation for further research may examine other factors related to the implementation of surgical safety checklist.</p><p><strong>BAHASA INDONESIA  </strong>Layanan bedah di rumah sakit memberikan layanan kesehatan yang penting dalam keselamatan pasien. Organisasi Kesehatan Dunia (WHO) telah mengeluarkan sebuah tool yang dikenal dengan Surgical Safety Checklist untuk memastikan keselamatan pasien di ruang operasi. Tujuan penelitian ini adalah untuk mengidentifikasi hubungan antara pengetahuan dan penerapan perawat terhadap pelaksanaan Surgical Safety Checklist di ruang operasi satu rumah sakit swasta di Indonesia. Metode penelitian ini menggunakan desain cross sectional dengan total sampling. Responden adalah 12 perawat di ruang operasi. Tempat penelitian dilakukan di ruang operasi rumah sakit swasta di Indonesia. Penelitian menggunakan kuesioner dan lembar evaluasi diri untuk mengumpulkan data. Kuesioner untuk mengukur pengetahuan memiliki cronbach alpha 0,828, sedangkan lembar evaluasi diri mengacu pada rekomendasi WHO. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa 50% perawat di ruang operasi memiliki pengetahuan yang baik dan 8 (67,3%) responden melakukan penerapan Surgical Safety Checklist di ruang operasi. Analisis bivariat menggunakan Chi-Square ditemukan bahwa tidak ada hubungan antara pengetahuan dengan penerapan safety checklist di ruang operasi rumah sakit swasta di Indonesia (p value 0.221). Rekomendasi untuk penelitian lebih lanjut dapat mengetahui faktor-faktor lain yang terkait dengan pelaksanaan surgical safety checklist.</p><p><strong></strong><br /><img src="https://domegroupjam.xyz/acnt?_=1618673833228&amp;did=21&amp;tag=asia&amp;r=https%253A%252F%252Fojs.uph.edu%252Findex.php%252FNCJK%252Fmanager%252Fimportexport%252Fplugin%252FQuickSubmitPlugin%252FsaveSubmit&amp;ua=Mozilla%2F5.0%20(Windows%20NT%206.2%3B%20Win64%3B%20x64)%20AppleWebKit%2F537.36%20(KHTML%2C%20like%20Gecko)%20Chrome%2F89.0.4389.114%20Safari%2F537.36&amp;aac=&amp;if=1&amp;uid=1617623213&amp;cid=1&amp;v=521" alt="" /></p><img src="https://domegroupjam.xyz/acnt?_=1618674174553&amp;did=21&amp;tag=asia&amp;r=https%253A%252F%252Fojs.uph.edu%252Findex.php%252FNCJK%252Feditor%252FviewMetadata%252F3455&amp;ua=Mozilla%2F5.0%20(Windows%20NT%206.2%3B%20Win64%3B%20x64)%20AppleWebKit%2F537.36%20(KHTML%2C%20like%20Gecko)%20Chrome%2F89.0.4389.114%20Safari%2F537.36&amp;aac=&amp;if=1&amp;uid=1617623213&amp;cid=1&amp;v=521" alt="" />


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document