scholarly journals Development of the Japanese Version FFS (Family Functioning Scale): Reliability and Validity for Family on Child-Fostering Phase

2012 ◽  
Vol 32 (1) ◽  
pp. 50-58 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mitsuko Kanzaki ◽  
Chifumi Otaki ◽  
Kazue Maeda ◽  
Taeko Hori ◽  
Akemi Take ◽  
...  
2013 ◽  
Vol 23 (5) ◽  
pp. 846-850 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chie Usui ◽  
Kotaro Hatta ◽  
Satoko Aratani ◽  
Naoko Yagishita ◽  
Kenya Nishioka ◽  
...  

2014 ◽  
Vol 68 (6) ◽  
pp. 448-455 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sosei Yamaguchi ◽  
Shinsuke Koike ◽  
Kei-ichiro Watanabe ◽  
Shuntaro Ando

2012 ◽  
Vol 20 (3) ◽  
pp. 212-229 ◽  
Author(s):  
Naohiro Hohashi ◽  
Junko Honda

Background and Purpose: Hohashi’s Concentric Sphere Family Environment Model (CSFEM; Hohashi & Honda, 2011) is a newly proposed family nursing theory for holistically understanding the family environment that acts on family well-being. The purpose of this article is to develop and psychometrically test the Japanese version of the Survey of Family Environment (SFE-J), grounded in the CSFEM, for measuring family’s perceived family functioning and family’s perceived needs for family support. Methods: The SFE-J is a 30-item self-administered instrument that assesses five domains (suprasystem, macrosystem, microsystem, family internal environment system, and chronosystem) and has been subjected to rigorous reliability and validity investigations among paired partners in child-rearing families (N of family = 1,990). Results: Internal consistency reliability was high as measured by Cronbach’s alpha coefficients. Temporal stability over a 2-week interval was supported by high (substantial or perfect) and significant intraclass correlation coefficients. The total score for the SFE-J was significantly correlated with the Japanese version of the Feetham Family Functioning Survey (FFFS-J), indicating an acceptable concurrent validity. Construct validity was supported by a confirmatory factor analysis that evaluated the five-factor structure to measure the concept of CSFEM. Results also demonstrate that the SFE-J family functioning scores show no significant differences between paired partners. Conclusions: The SFE-J is a reliable and valid instrument to assess not only intrafamily functioning but also interfamily functioning and, by identifying items/domains with high requirements for family support, serves to facilitate the providing of appropriate support to families.


2014 ◽  
Vol 35 (4) ◽  
pp. 236-244 ◽  
Author(s):  
Atsushi Oshio ◽  
Shingo Abe ◽  
Pino Cutrone ◽  
Samuel D. Gosling

The Ten Item Personality Inventory (TIPI; Gosling, Rentfrow, & Swann, 2003 ) is a widely used very brief measure of the Big Five personality dimensions. Oshio, Abe, and Cutrone (2012) have developed a Japanese version of the TIPI (TIPI-J), which demonstrated acceptable levels of reliability and validity. Until now, all studies examining the validity of the TIPI-J have been conducted in the Japanese language; this reliance on a single language raises concerns about the instrument’s content validity because the instrument could demonstrate reliability (e.g., retest) and some forms of validity (e.g., convergent) but still not capture the full range of the dimensions as originally conceptualized in English. Therefore, to test the content validity of the Japanese TIPI with respect to the original Big Five formulation, we examine the convergence between scores on the TIPI-J and scores on the English-language Big Five Inventory (i.e., the BFI-E), an instrument specifically designed to optimize Big Five content coverage. Two-hundred and twenty-eight Japanese undergraduate students, who were all learning English, completed the two instruments. The results of correlation analyses and structural equation modeling demonstrate the theorized congruence between the TIPI-J and the BFI-E, supporting the content validity of the TIPI-J.


2019 ◽  
Vol 56 (1) ◽  
pp. 28-36
Author(s):  
Yeşim Aksoy Derya ◽  
Aslı Sis Çelik ◽  
Serap Ejder Apay

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document