scholarly journals Quantitative myocardial blush score (QuBE) allows the prediction of heart failure development in long-term follow-up in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: Proof of concept study

2019 ◽  
Vol 26 (4) ◽  
pp. 322-332 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andrzej Tomasik ◽  
Tomasz Młyńczak ◽  
Edyta Nowak ◽  
Katarzyna Pigoń ◽  
Artur Iwasieczko ◽  
...  
2021 ◽  
Vol 42 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
A Timoteo ◽  
L Moura Branco ◽  
A Galrinho ◽  
T Mano ◽  
P Rio ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Left ventricular (LV) global longitudinal strain has demonstrated incremental prognostic value over LV ejection fraction (LVEF) in patients with ST-segment-elevation acute myocardial infarction. However, LV global longitudinal strain (GLS) does not take into consideration the effect of afterload. Myocardial work (MW) by speckle-tracking echocardiography integrates blood pressure measurements (afterload) with LV GLS and it has been recently demonstrated that Global Work Efficiency (GWE) is associated with long-term all-cause mortality. It remains to be demonstrated if MW indices are associated with hard cardiovascular endpoints. The present study aimed to investigate the prognostic value of global LV MW obtained from pressure-strain loops with echocardiography in patients with ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction. Methods A total of 100 consecutive ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction patients (mean age, 61±12 years; 75% men) that survived to discharge were retrospectively analysed. LVEF, GLS and all LVMW indices were measured by transthoracic echocardiography before discharge (4.6±2.0 days after admission). All patients had at least a two-year follow-up (mean follow-up of 833±172 days). Outcomes: all-cause mortality, major acute cardiovascular events (a composite of cardiovascular mortality, myocardial infarction, stroke, unplanned cardiovascular admission) and heart failure hospitalization. Results In the two-year follow-up, 6 patients died, there were 17 patients with MACE, and 3 patients were hospitalized with heart failure. We confirmed that for all-cause mortality, GWE showed higher discrimination, compared to GLS (Table 1), with a cut-off of 83% (log-rank <0,001). For MACE, the performance of all methods is suboptimal, with an AUC <0.65 for all variables, except for GLS. For heart failure admission, performance is slightly better, but GLS is still the better parameter to predict this event. Conclusions LVGWE is a better predictor of all-cause mortality compared to GLS, but MW indices failed to demonstrate a prognostic impact in long-term cardiovascular events. Prospective studies are warranted to confirm this finding. FUNDunding Acknowledgement Type of funding sources: None. Table 1


2014 ◽  
pp. 140-145 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dariusz Dudek ◽  
Artur Dziewierz ◽  
Paweł Kleczyński ◽  
Dawid Giszterowicz ◽  
Tomasz Rakowski ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 50 (6) ◽  
pp. 711-715
Author(s):  
Arshad A. Khan ◽  
Trent Williams ◽  
Mohamed S. Al‐Omary ◽  
Alex L. Feeney ◽  
Tazeen Majeed ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 40 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
A Milosevic ◽  
D Milasinovic ◽  
Z Vasiljevic ◽  
V Vukcevic ◽  
M Dikic ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Most of the previous studies evaluated the impact of early versus delayed invasive intervention on clinical outcomes in patients with non-ST segment elevation acute coronary syndrome (NSTE-ACS) in one-year period. Purpose The aim of this study was to assess whether the immediate invasive intervention influences the occurrence of death and new myocardial infarction (MI), specifically in patients with non-ST segment MI (NSTEMI) in long-term follow-up. Methods In The Randomized Study of Immediate Versus Delayed Invasive Intervention in Patients With Non ST-segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction (RIDDLE-NSTEMI) 323 patients with NSTEMI were randomized to either immediate (median time to intervention was 1.4 hours) or delayed invasive strategy (61.0 hours). The incidence of primary outcome -death or new MI at 30 days was lower in patients assigned to the immediate (n=162) than in patients assigned to the delayed (n=161) invasive intervention group (4.3% vs. 13%, respectively; p=0.008). Long-term follow-up of 5 years was available for 96.90% of the patients. Results At 5 years, the immediate invasive intervention was associated with lower rate of death or new MI, compared with delayed invasive strategy (15.8% vs 32.9%, respectively; p=0.00). The observed benefit of the immediate intervention was mainly due to an increased early reinfarction risk with the delayed strategy (2.5% vs 9.9%, p=0.001) with similar new MI rates beyond 30 days (5.9% in the immediate and 10.7% in the delayed group, p=0.130). Five-year mortality was 12.0% in the immediate invasive intervention strategy group, and 18.1% in the delayed strategy group (p=0.135). Conclusion Immediate invasive intervention in the patients with NSTEMI significantly reduces the early risk of new MI. However, the timing of invasive intervention appears not to have significant impact on the clinical outcome beyond 30 days.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document