scholarly journals New spirometry? The 2019 update of the test standardization

2020 ◽  
Vol 88 (2) ◽  
pp. 95-98
Author(s):  
Piotr Wiktor Boros ◽  
Magdalena Maria Martusewicz-Boros
Keyword(s):  
1970 ◽  
Vol 26 (3) ◽  
pp. 975-984
Author(s):  
Mary Juhan Larsen ◽  
Jerry C. Allen

Item performance on the Stanford-Binet by a sample ( n = 289) of Georgia children (CA = 5) and by equivalent-aged children used in the test standardization was compared in terms of 5 subject variables: race, sex, socioeconomic status, intelligence level, and community size. The Georgia Sample's performance exceeded ( p < .01) the norm group's performance on 62% of the items. The five subject variables were associated with these differences: among levels of the variables, variations occurred in the presence and direction of item performance differences; generally, more than one subject variable influenced item performance. These data affirm that certain variables confound intelligence test performance and that norms based on a single variable, like race, do not eliminate test biases.


2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (4) ◽  
pp. 73-84
Author(s):  
E.A. Sergienko ◽  
E.A. Khlevnaya ◽  
T.S. Kiseleva

This paper contains a description of the task methodology for assessing the level of development of emotional intelligence in adolescents aged 10 to 18 years MSCEIT–YRV (Mayer-Salovey-Caruso Emotional Intelligence Test – Youth Research Version). The paper provides main data on the adaptation of the methodology to the Russian-speaking sample. Adaptation and psychometric testing of the methodology were carried out using data from 996 adolescents aged 10 to 18 years (430 boys and 566 girls, mean age 13,3 years). This methodology provides information on the general level of development of emotional intelligence, indicators of the Experiential and Strategic domains of emotional intelligence and scores for four abilities (identification of emotions, facilitation of thought, understanding emotions and emotion management). The main psychometric indicators of reliability and validity of MSCEIT-YRV meet the requirements of test standardization. The paper also describes gender and age differences in emotional intelligence, shows a comparison of normative samples for the English and Russian versions of the MSCEIT–YRV method.


1991 ◽  
Vol 44 (3) ◽  
pp. 260-271 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kristen A. Weigle ◽  
Liliana Valderrama ◽  
Alba Lucia Arias ◽  
Cecilia Santrich ◽  
Nancy G. Saravia

2005 ◽  
Vol 28 (1) ◽  
pp. 3-9 ◽  
Author(s):  
N. Vo ◽  
M. Kwoka ◽  
P. Bush

1965 ◽  
Vol 80 (3) ◽  
pp. 220 ◽  
Author(s):  
John B. O'Sullivan ◽  
Mary Ellen Grant ◽  
John O'S. Francis

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document