scholarly journals Invariant surfaces for toric type foliations in dimension three

2021 ◽  
Vol 65 ◽  
pp. 291-307
Author(s):  
Felipe Cano ◽  
Beatriz Molina-Samper
Keyword(s):  
Invariant Surfaces

scholarly journals Rational Maps with Invariant Surfaces

2018 ◽  
Vol 3 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Nalini Joshi ◽  
Claude-Michel Viallet
Keyword(s):  
Rational Maps ◽  
Invariant Surfaces

Physical topology of three-dimensional unsteady flows with spheroidal invariant surfaces

2020 ◽  
Vol 101 (5) ◽  
Author(s):  
P. S. Contreras ◽  
M. F. M. Speetjens ◽  
H. J. H. Clercx
Keyword(s):  
Three Dimensional ◽  
Unsteady Flows ◽  
Invariant Surfaces

Loxodromes on Invariant Surfaces in Three-Manifolds

2019 ◽  
Vol 17 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Renzo Caddeo ◽  
Irene I. Onnis ◽  
Paola Piu
Keyword(s):  
Invariant Surfaces

DYNAMICS OF THE MUTHUSWAMY–CHUA SYSTEM

2013 ◽  
Vol 23 (08) ◽  
pp. 1350136 ◽  
Author(s):  
YUANFAN ZHANG ◽  
XIANG ZHANG
Keyword(s):  
Periodic Orbit ◽  
Periodic Orbits ◽  
Chaotic Attractor ◽  
Electronic Circuit ◽  
Small Perturbations ◽  
Chaotic Phenomena ◽  
Invariant Surfaces

The Muthuswamy–Chua system [Formula: see text] describes the simplest electronic circuit which can have chaotic phenomena. In this paper, we first prove the existence of three families of consecutive periodic orbits of the system when α = 0, two of which are located on consecutive invariant surfaces and form two invariant topological cylinders. Then we prove that for α > 0 if the system has a periodic orbit or a chaotic attractor, it must intersect both of the planes z = 0 and z = -1 infinitely many times as t tends to infinity. As a byproduct, we get an example of unstable invariant topological cylinders which are not normally hyperbolic and which are also destroyed under small perturbations.

Almost-invariant surfaces for magnetic field-line flows

1996 ◽  
Vol 56 (2) ◽  
pp. 361-382 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. R. Hudson ◽  
R. L. Dewar
Keyword(s):  
Magnetic Field ◽  
Field Line ◽  
Magnetic Field Line ◽  
Gradient Flow ◽  
Invariant Surface ◽  
Infinite Dimensional ◽  
Invariant Surfaces ◽  
Magnetic Surfaces ◽  
Rotational Transform ◽  
The Magnetic Field

Two approaches to defining almost-invariant surfaces for magnetic fields with imperfect magnetic surfaces are compared. Both methods are based on treating magnetic field-line flow as a 1½-dimensional Hamiltonian (or Lagrangian) dynamical system. In thequadratic-flux minimizing surfaceapproach, the integral of the square of the action gradient over the toroidal and poloidal angles is minimized, while in theghost surfaceapproach a gradient flow between a minimax and an action-minimizing orbit is used. In both cases the almost-invariant surface is constructed as a family of periodic pseudo-orbits, and consequently it has a rational rotational transform. The construction of quadratic-flux minimizing surfaces is simple, and easily implemented using a new magnetic field-line tracing method. The construction of ghost surfaces requires the representation of a pseudo field line as an (in principle) infinite-dimensional vector and also is inherently slow for systems near integrability. As a test problem the magnetic field-line Hamiltonian is constructed analytically for a topologically toroidal, non-integrable ABC-flow model, and both types of almost-invariant surface are constructed numerically.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document