scholarly journals Influence of Citizens and Form of Government on Alternative Service Delivery Choices in Local Governments

2016 ◽  
Vol 5 (2) ◽  
pp. 19
Author(s):  
Azhar Manzoor

<p>Citizens are an essential part of democratic setup and especially as recipients of public services play a crucial role in decisions regarding provision of these services. Citizen engagement not only provides feedback on the activities undertaken by government but may also influence how governments plans for future allocation of resources and means for providing various services. Citizen engagement emerges from the initiatives taken by the governments to improve the quality of government planning, processes, and decisions as well as it is a source of legitimacy to such decisions as part of democratic process. However, there are tremendous pressures from various actors such as government officials for cutting costs due to budgetary constraints, public managers for managing costs and quality, vendors for bargaining and deciding cost versus service quality measures, technical and line staff for administrating negotiations and producing services, and citizens for receiving services in exchange of price they pay in the form of taxes. This study examines the effects of citizens and forms of government on the service decisions regarding health and human services. Findings fail to support citizen’s role but indicate a significant role of form of government, partisanship orientation, and taxes in making alternative service delivery choices.</p>

2011 ◽  
Vol 41 (4) ◽  
pp. 686-708 ◽  
Author(s):  
Skip Krueger ◽  
Robert W. Walker ◽  
Ethan Bernick

Author(s):  
Beth Walter Honadle ◽  
James M Costa ◽  
Beverly A. Cigler

2006 ◽  
Vol 12 (1) ◽  
pp. 19-22 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sajeesh Kumar ◽  
Mei-Ling Tay-Kearney ◽  
Francisco Chaves ◽  
Ian J Constable ◽  
Kanagasingam Yogesan

2015 ◽  
Vol 26 (2) ◽  
pp. 359-374 ◽  
Author(s):  
Scott Lamothe ◽  
Meeyoung Lamothe

Using four consecutive International City/County Management Association alternative service delivery arrangement surveys, this study explores the determinants of service shedding by local government in the United States. Our findings indicate that service shedding is fairly common, with almost 70% of jurisdictions experiencing at least one termination between 1992 and 1997. With regards to why jurisdictions shed services, we find that prior delivery mode is very influential. Specifically, services that were contracted out in the previous time period are much more likely to be dropped than are those that were produced in-house. We also find that the behavior of neighboring jurisdictions matters—if your neighbors tend to provide a service, you tend to continue to do so as well. We find little support for the idea that either budget stress or ideology is impactful in the decision to drop services.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document