scholarly journals Effect of Alcohol Consumption on the Sperm DNA Integrity: A Systematic Review

2017 ◽  
Vol 9 (13) ◽  
pp. 136
Author(s):  
Farah Hanan Fathihah Jaafar ◽  
Khairul Osman ◽  
Jaya Kumar ◽  
Siti Fatimah Ibrahim

There is no solid conclusion on the conventional sperm parameters in association with alcohol consumption, evaluation of sperm DNA integrity thus become a more reliable parameter. Hereby, this literature search was performed to summarize alcohol consumption on the sperm DNA integrity. A computerized database search was done through MEDLINE via Ovid (since 1946 until August 2017) and Cochrane was used. The following set of keywords: ‘alcohol consumption OR alcohol intake OR alcohol diet OR drinking alcohol OR ethanol diet’ AND ‘sperm DNA OR sperm chromatin OR sperm genome OR sperm histone OR sperm protamine’ were utilised. 24 articles were retrieved where only five studies conform to the inclusion criteria All studies demonstrated a negative effect of alcohol consumption on sperm DNA integrity, regardless of various range of alcohol doses and duration of alcohol consumption. Out of five studies reviewed, four studies were using a different approach to measure the sperm DNA damage. Hereby, this review identified a need to use a single approach of DNA damage test by having various method of alcohol administration and/or vice versa so that the extension of sperm DNA damage to alcohol consumption will have a better conclusion. On the same note, a few studies have reported the reversibility on conventional semen parameters, none has been done on the sperm DNA damage upon alcohol withdrawal. Therefore, the role of alcohol withdrawal on the reversibility of sperm DNA damage needs to be as well investigated further.

2016 ◽  
Vol 283 (1826) ◽  
pp. 20152708 ◽  
Author(s):  
Javier delBarco-Trillo ◽  
Olga García-Álvarez ◽  
Ana Josefa Soler ◽  
Maximiliano Tourmente ◽  
José Julián Garde ◽  
...  

Sperm competition, a prevalent evolutionary process in which the spermatozoa of two or more males compete for the fertilization of the same ovum, leads to morphological and physiological adaptations, including increases in energetic metabolism that may serve to propel sperm faster but that may have negative effects on DNA integrity. Sperm DNA damage is associated with reduced rates of fertilization, embryo and fetal loss, offspring mortality, and mutations leading to genetic disease. We tested whether high levels of sperm competition affect sperm DNA integrity. We evaluated sperm DNA integrity in 18 species of rodents that differ in their levels of sperm competition using the sperm chromatin structure assay. DNA integrity was assessed upon sperm collection, in response to incubation under capacitating or non-capacitating conditions, and after exposure to physical and chemical stressors. Sperm DNA was very resistant to physical and chemical stressors, whereas incubation in non-capacitating and capacitating conditions resulted in only a small increase in sperm DNA damage. Importantly, levels of sperm competition were positively associated with sperm DNA fragmentation across rodent species. This is the first evidence showing that high levels of sperm competition lead to an important cost in the form of increased sperm DNA damage.


Biomonitoring ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Hueiwang Anna Jeng ◽  
Ruei-Nian Li ◽  
Wen-Yi Lin

Abstract:The present study aimed to investigate the relationship between semen quality parameters and DNA integrity, and determine whether semen quality parameters could serve as a reliable biomarker for monitoring sperm DNA damage. Conventional semen parameters from a total of 202 male human subjects were analyzed. DNA fragmentation and 8-oxo-7,8-dihydro-2′- deoxyguanosine (8-oxoGuo) were used to assess sperm DNA integrity. DNA fragmentation was analyzed by the terminal deoxynucleotidyl transferase dUTP nick end labeling (TUNEL) assay and sperm chromatin structure assay (SCSA), while 8-oxodGuo was quantified by the liquid chromatography/tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) coupled with an on-line solid phase system. The levels of 8-oxodGuo levels in sperm were related to the percentages of DNA fragmentation measured by both the TUNEL and SCSA (r = 0.22, p = 0.048; r = 0.12, p = 0.039). Sperm vitality, motility and morphology from all of the participants exhibited a weak correlation with the levels of 8-oxodGuo and the percentages of DNA fragmentation. Semen quality parameters may be independent of the formation of DNA fragmentation and oxidative adducts in sperm. Semen quality parameters may be insufficient to monitor sperm DNA fragmentation and oxidative damage. DNA damage in sperm is recommended to be included in routine measurements.


2012 ◽  
Vol 2012 ◽  
pp. 1-6 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mona Bungum

Infertility affects 15% of all couples. Although male infertility factors with reduced semen quality are contributing to about half of all involuntary childlessness, the value of standard semen parameters in prediction of fertilityin vivoand choice of proper method for assisted reproduction is limited. In the search for better markers of male fertility, during the last 10 years, assessment of sperm DNA integrity has emerged as a strong new biomarker of semen quality that may have the potential to discriminate between infertile and fertile men. Sperm DNA Fragmentation Index (DFI) as assessed by the flow cytometric Sperm Chromatin Structure Assay (SCSA) can be used for evaluation of sperm chromatin integrity. The biological background for abnormal DFI is not completely known, but clinical data show that DFI above 30% is associated with very low chance for achieving pregnancy in natural way or by insemination, but notin vitro. Already when the DFI is above 20%, the chance of natural pregnancy may be reduced, despite other sperm parameters being normal. Thus this method may explain a significant proportion of cases of unexplained infertility and can be beneficial in counselling involuntary childless couples need ofin vitrofertilisation.


2018 ◽  
Vol 30 (1) ◽  
pp. 210 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. T. Peña ◽  
B. Gummow ◽  
A. J. Parker ◽  
D. B. B. P. Paris

Seasonal heat stress is known to significantly diminish reproductive performance in pigs, particularly in the tropics, costing the industry millions in annual losses. The boar’s reduced capacity to sweat and non-pendulous scrotum, combined with the widespread use of European breeds in the tropics, makes this species particularly vulnerable to heat stress. Although heat stress is traditionally considered a sow problem, recent mouse studies demonstrate that heat stress-induced sperm DNA damage can result in arrested development and loss of early embryos. Our study investigated the impact of tropical summer heat stress on the quality and DNA integrity of boar sperm, and trialled antioxidant supplementation to alleviate the problem. Data, expressed as mean ± SEM, were analysed by one-way repeated-measures ANOVA with pairwise Bonferroni tests. Motility of sperm obtained from Large White boars (n = 5) housed in the dry tropics of Townsville, North Queensland, Australia, was characterised by computer-assisted sperm analysis but did not differ between summer, winter, or spring (total motility: 71.3 ± 8.1 v. 90.2 ± 4.2 v. 70.8 ± 5.5%, respectively; P > 0.05; progressive motility: 35.4 ± 7.0 v. 46.6 ± 4.0 v. 41.7 ± 2.8%, respectively; P > 0.05). Sperm DNA integrity in 20,000 sperm/boar per season, evaluated using TUNEL and flow cytometry, revealed 16-fold more DNA-damaged sperm in summer than winter, and nearly 9-fold more than spring (16.1 ± 4.8 v. 1.0 ± 0.2 v. 1.9 ± 0.5%, respectively; P ≤ 0.05). However, boar feed supplemented with 100 g/boar per day of proprietary custom-made antioxidants during summer significantly reduced sperm DNA damage to 9.9 ± 4.5% and 7.2 ± 1.6% (P ≤ 0.05) after 42 and 84 days of treatment respectively. Total and progressive motility were not altered by the supplement. In summary, sperm DNA integrity is compromised in boars during summer, suggesting that boar factors may contribute to seasonal embryo loss in sows. Moreover, such damage appears undetectable using traditional measures of sperm motility. Antioxidant supplementation during summer appears to mitigate the negative impact of heat stress on sperm DNA integrity.


2019 ◽  
Vol 29 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Cécile Grèze ◽  
Aline Guttmann ◽  
Hanae Pons-Rejraji ◽  
Marie-Paule Vasson ◽  
Jacqueline Lornage ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Numerous tests have been proposed to evaluate sperm DNA integrity. To assess the sperm chromatin dispersion (SCD) test in an andrology laboratory, twenty-five men attending Clermont-Ferrand (France) University Hospital’s Center for Reproductive Medicine were recruited. Sperm DNA damage was measured in the same semen samples using the SCD test and the Terminal Uridine Nick-end Labeling by flow cytometry technique (TUNEL/FCM) after density gradient centrifugation. Results SCD test reliability between readings, readers or slides was clearly established with very high agreement between measurements (Intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) at 0.97, 0.95 and 0.98 respectively). Despite very good agreement between the SCD test and TUNEL/FCM (ICC at 0.94), the SCD test tended to slightly but significantly underestimate DNA damage compared with TUNEL (p = 0.0127). This systematic difference between the two techniques was − 3.39 ± 1.45% (mean ± SE). Conclusions Andrology laboratories using the SCD test to measure sperm DNA damage need to know that it appears to give slightly underestimated measurements compared to TUNEL/FCM. However, this systematic underestimation is very small in amplitude. Both techniques give almost perfectly congruent results. Our study underlines the importance for each laboratory to validate its method to assess sperm DNA damage before implementing it in routine andrology lab practice.


2017 ◽  
Vol 108 (3) ◽  
pp. e178
Author(s):  
G.D. Smith ◽  
W.R. Parker ◽  
L. Keller ◽  
Y. Li ◽  
A. Brady ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 58 (2) ◽  
pp. 252 ◽  
Author(s):  
L. Fraser ◽  
Ł. Zasiadczyk ◽  
C. S. Pareek

Assessment of sperm-DNA integrity is a crucial issue in male fertility. In the present study, parameters derived from the image analysis of comets after single-cell gel electrophoresis were used to analyse the types of DNA damage of frozen–thawed boar spermatozoa. Semen, frozen in a cryoprotectant-free extender or in cryoprotectant-based extenders, was analysed for DNA fragmentation and with the following comet tail measures: percentage DNA in comet tail, comet tail length and olive tail moment. The percentages of sperm DNA damage in the comet tails were classified as Type 0 (no DNA damage), Type I (very low DNA damage), Type II (light DNA damage), Type III (medium DNA damage) and Type IV (heavy DNA damage). Sperm motility characteristics and membrane integrity were assessed in the pre-freeze and frozen–thawed semen samples. Assessment of sperm DNA fragmentation and comet tail measures showed marked inter-boar variability following cryopreservation. However, consistent differences among the boars, with respect to cryo-induced sperm DNA damage, were detected by the comet tail length and olive tail moment. Besides Type IV, all types of DNA damage were detected in the cryoprotectant-based extenders. It was found that the frequency of Type II and Type III of DNA damage of frozen–thawed spermatozoa was significantly greater in the cryoprotectant-based and cryoprotectant-free extenders respectively. Deterioration in the quality of the sperm DNA integrity was concomitant with a marked decline in sperm motility characteristics, reduced plasma membrane integrity and higher lipid peroxidation and aspartate aminotransferase activity after cryopreservation. It can be suggested that the comet-assay parameters, coupled with routine laboratory tests, are useful to improve the sperm evaluations of post-thaw quality of semen from individual boars and would offer more comprehensive information for a better understanding of the degree of cryo-induced sperm-DNA damage.


2019 ◽  
Vol 4 ◽  
pp. 31-31 ◽  
Author(s):  
Cécile Le Saint ◽  
Isaac-Jacques Kadoch ◽  
François Bissonnette ◽  
Julie Choi ◽  
Jonathan Zini ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document