A Correcting Note on Forecasting Conditional Variance Using ARIMA vs. GARCH Model
2019 ◽
Vol 11
(5)
◽
pp. 145
Keyword(s):
Catch Up
◽
In this study, we demonstrate that a common approach in using the Autoregressive Integrated Moving Average model is not efficient to forecast all types of time series data and most specially, the out-of-sample forecasting of the time series that exhibits clustering volatility. This gap leads to introduce a competing model to catch up with the clustering volatility and conditional variance for which, we empirically document the efficient and lower error use of the Generalized Autoregressive Conditional Heteroscedasticity model instead.
2019 ◽
Vol 9
(1)
◽
pp. 220
2019 ◽
Vol 13
(3)
◽
pp. 135-144
2020 ◽
Vol 10
(4)
◽
pp. 46-50
1997 ◽
Vol 1581
(1)
◽
pp. 89-92
2017 ◽
Vol 12
(1)
◽
pp. 43-50