scholarly journals Quality Learning Environments: Design-Studio Classroom

2012 ◽  
Vol 4 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Asem Obeidat ◽  
Raed Al-Share
Keyword(s):  
Learning Environments ◽  
Design Studio ◽  
Studio Classroom ◽  
Quality Learning

scholarly journals Experiential and Integrated Learning Environments – Teaching Urban Design Studio at Curtin University

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Francesco Maria Mancini ◽  
Tanja Glusac
Keyword(s):  
Experiential Learning ◽  
Learning Environments ◽  
Urban Design ◽  
Action Learning ◽  
Urban Setting ◽  
Advanced Technology ◽  
Design Studio ◽  
Integrated Learning ◽  
Learning Collaborative ◽  
The Government

Experiential Learning and Integrated Learning Environments in Architecture is a pedagogic project based on action learning (Revans, 1980) that challenges the traditional design studio teaching approach to Architectural/Urban Design and builds on Dewey (1939) and Kolb (1984) theories of experiential learning. An innovative model of teaching Urban Design to Master of Architecture students has been trailed for the first time in 2018, when the studio was set in the City of Bayswater, and has been refined over the course of 2019 in two separate study periods – Study Period 1 (Rome/Milan Study Tour) and Semester 2. This model provides students with an opportunity to collaboratively learn from and re-design the existing urban environments by immersing themselves in the very context they are studying. The proximity of the classroom to the urban setting presented an opportunity for students to draw comparisons and analysis between national and international examples and that of the surrounding urban milieu. Additionally, advanced technology supportive of distributed learning environment and intense collaboration with industry such as Hassell, Element and The Office of the Government Architect (OGA), coupled with opportunities to visit various practices, provided deeper insights and an all rounded approach to learning and engaging with architecture. Keywords: experiential learning; collaborative learning environments; architecture, urban design

Designing and Developing Competency-Based Education Courses Using Standards

2017 ◽  
pp. 232-249 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nancy B. Hastings ◽  
Karen L. Rasmussen
Keyword(s):  
Learning Environments ◽  
High Quality ◽  
Competency Based Education ◽  
Policies And Procedures ◽  
Quality Product ◽  
Competency Based ◽  
Micro Level ◽  
Quality Learning ◽  
Education Courses ◽  
High Quality Product

Standards provide designers and developers of competency-based education courses and programs with a structure and framework that serve as a way to create quality learning environments that align objectives, instruction, and assessments. At the micro-level, standards facilitate direction of the structure, format, and content of a competency-based course that ensures a high-quality product. At the macro-level, standards help institutional administrators and faculty make good, informed decisions about program policies and procedures.

Electronic Classroom, Electronic Community

2010 ◽  
pp. 439-456
Author(s):  
Lisa Harris
Keyword(s):  
Online Learning ◽  
Learning Community ◽  
Case Studies ◽  
Learning Environments ◽  
Online Learning Environments ◽  
Electronic Classroom ◽  
Electronic Community ◽  
Quality Learning ◽  
New Evidence ◽  
The Relationship

The capacity for online learning environments to provide good quality learning experiences for students has been the focus of speculation and debate in the higher education sector from the late 1990s to the present day. In this area, “quality” has become synonymous with engaging students in a learning community. This chapter reports on a qualitative research project designed to explore the significance of community for students studying online. Using three fundamentally different types of online learning environments as case studies, this research explored the relationship between the constructed online learning environment and the development of learning communities or what the author has termed social learning support networks (SLSN). Exploring the common themes to emerge from these three case studies, this research provides new evidence of the benefit of community for students studying online and argues that future online learning environments should be shaped by five key principles designed to foster a sense of social connection between students.

Culturally Responsive Relationships Focused Pedagogies

2020 ◽  
pp. 127-157
Author(s):  
Catherine Maree Burgess ◽  
John Robert Evans
Keyword(s):  
Learning Environments ◽  
Professional Learning ◽  
Culturally Responsive ◽  
Educational Process ◽  
Community Members ◽  
Social And Cultural Capital ◽  
Aboriginal Students ◽  
Teacher Professional ◽  
Quality Learning ◽  
Marginalised Students

This chapter examines the importance of culturally responsive relationships-focused pedagogical approaches in engaging Aboriginal students in their learning and the significance of this to improving their educational outcomes. Significantly, the themes and issues raised in this chapter reflect much of the international literature on Indigenous, minority and marginalised students. The following enablers are necessary when implementing culturally responsive relationships focused pedagogies: Engaging with Aboriginal families and community members; Harnessing Aboriginal students' backgrounds, lived experiences and interests as classroom resources; Implementing innovative place-based curriculum approaches, and Exploring holistic teacher professional learning opportunities. The combination of these factors creates quality learning environments as places of belonging and socio-cultural support underpinned by mobilising Aboriginal family and community social and cultural capital in the educational process. Once schools and teachers realise the potential of this approach, conditions are created to improve the academic, social and cultural outcomes of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander students.

scholarly journals High-Quality Learning Environments for Engineering Design: Using Tablet PCs and Guidelines from Research on How People Learn

2012 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Enrique Palou ◽  
Lourdes Gazca ◽  
Juan Antonio Díaz García ◽  
José Andrés Rojas Lobato ◽  
Luis Geraldo Guerrero Ojeda ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Formative Assessment ◽  
Engineering Design ◽  
Learning Environments ◽  
Teaching And Learning ◽  
Student Thinking ◽  
Formative Assessments ◽  
Tablet Pcs ◽  
Interactive Classroom ◽  
How People Learn ◽  
Quality Learning

A team of several faculty members and graduate students at Universidad de las Amricas Puebla is improving engineering design teaching and learning by creating richer learning environments that promote an interactive classroom while integrating formative assessment into classroom practices by means of Tablet PCs and associated technologies. Learning environments that are knowledge-, learner-, community-, and assessment-centered as highlighted by the How People Learn framework, have been developed. To date, the redesign of the undergraduate course entitled Introduction to Engineering Design has signicantly (p<0.05) increased student participation; formative assessment and feedback are more common and rapid; and instructors are utilizing the information gained through real-time formative assessments to tailor instruction to meet student needs. Particularly important have been opportunities to make student thinking visible and to give them chances to revise, as well as opportunities for "what if" thinking.

scholarly journals Foregrounding knowledge in e-learning design: An illustration in a museum setting

2015 ◽  
Vol 31 (3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Lucila Carvalho ◽  
Andy Dong ◽  
Karl Maton
Keyword(s):  
High School Students ◽  
Digital Media ◽  
Learning Environments ◽  
Interaction Design ◽  
Design Studio ◽  
School Students ◽  
Design Elements ◽  
Knowledge Practices ◽  
E Learning ◽  
The Creation

<p>The nature of knowledge, and the various forms knowledge may take, is a neglected aspect of the development of e-learning environments. This paper uses Legitimation Code Theory (LCT) to conceptualise the organising principles of knowledge practices. As we will illustrate, when it comes to the design of e-learning, the organising principles of the knowledge comprising the subject area, matters as much as the content. Drawing on one dimension of LCT, <em>Specialisation</em>, we show how to identify and apply organising principles of knowledge, in two successive stages, through an example of our own recent work developing an e-learning environment called Design Studio. First, an <em>analytic</em> stage explored knowledge practices within four design disciplines, engineering, architecture, digital media, and fashion design, in terms of their organising principles. Second, a <em>generative</em> stage involved the creation of content for the Design Studio software as well as its look and feel, and interaction design elements, all of which were designed to be consistent with the output from the analytic stage. Design Studio was then pilot-tested by 14 high school students. The paper concludes with some general observations about how LCT can improve the creation of other e-learning environments.</p>

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document