scholarly journals Paroxysmal atrial fibrillation in young cryptogenic ischemic stroke: A 3-week ECG Holter monitoring study

2015 ◽  
Vol 159 (2) ◽  
pp. 283-287 ◽  
Author(s):  
Daniel Sanak ◽  
Martin Hutyra ◽  
Michal Kral ◽  
Andrea Bartkova ◽  
Jana Zapletalova ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Atrial Fibrillation ◽  
Ischemic Stroke ◽  
Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation ◽  
Holter Monitoring ◽  
Monitoring Study

A score for paroxysmal atrial fibrillation in acute ischemic stroke

2017 ◽  
Vol 13 (5) ◽  
pp. 496-502 ◽  
Author(s):  
Halvor Naess ◽  
Ulrike W Andreassen ◽  
Lars Thomassen ◽  
Christopher E Kvistad
Keyword(s):  
Atrial Fibrillation ◽  
Ischemic Stroke ◽  
Sinus Rhythm ◽  
Acute Ischemic Stroke ◽  
Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation ◽  
Heart Diseases ◽  
Holter Monitoring ◽  
Mri Findings ◽  
Blood Tests ◽  
Univariate Analyses

Aim Many patients with ischemic stroke have paroxysmal atrial fibrillation that may be difficult to detect. We sought to identify markers of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation and construct a score that may help the clinician to select patients for anticoagulation even if investigations do not disclose atrial fibrillation. Methods A group of patients with acute ischemic stroke and TIA and documented paroxysmal atrial fibrillation was compared to a group of patients with ischemic stroke and TIA and no known paroxysmal atrial fibrillation and sinus rhythm on Holter monitoring. Clinical features, blood tests, ECG, and MRI findings were compared. Sensitivity and specificity of significant markers for paroxysmal atrial fibrillation were calculated. A simple score based on independent markers for paroxysmal atrial fibrillation was constructed. Results Out of 3480 patients with TIA or ischemic stroke, 237 (19%) had paroxysmal atrial fibrillation and 1002 (81%) had sinus rhythm. On univariate analyses, significant markers for paroxysmal atrial fibrillation included increasing age, females, prior ischemic stroke, myocardial infarction, other heart diseases, pathologic troponin, embolic stroke and stroke in different arterial territories (all P < .01). A score including age dichotomized at 75 years, cardiac disease and troponin was constructed. Conclusion We identified many markers for paroxysmal atrial fibrillation and constructed a score that may help the clinician to select patients for anticoagulation even if investigations do not disclose paroxysmal atrial fibrillation.

scholarly journals Screening of Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation after Ischemic Stroke: 48-Hour Holter Monitoring versus Prolonged Intermittent ECG Recording

ISRN Stroke ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 2014 ◽  
pp. 1-6 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gustav Orrsjö ◽  
Björn Cederin ◽  
Eric Bertholds ◽  
Salmir Nasic ◽  
Lennart Welin
Keyword(s):  
Atrial Fibrillation ◽  
Ischemic Stroke ◽  
Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation ◽  
Screening Method ◽  
Final Analysis ◽  
Holter Monitoring ◽  
Screening Methods ◽  
Stroke Registry ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Basic Characteristics

Aims. Screening of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (PAF) after ischemic stroke and TIA is important. The ideal method is not known and studies of intermittent screening methods in particular are lacking. In this retrospective study we compared a shorter continuous screening method with an intermittent screening method. Methods. Since early 2011 our stroke unit has used two different methods of screening: either a 48-hour continuous screening with Holter monitor or a 21-day twice daily intermittent screening with a hand-held ECG recorder. Through the Swedish National Stroke Registry and medical records reviewing all screening episodes between 2011-02-01 and 2013-01-31 were collected and analysed.   Results. Of 386 screenings, 26 screenings were excluded leaving 360 screenings for the final analysis of which 114 screenings were made with hand-held ECG recorder and 246 with Holter monitoring. No significant difference between the groups concerning basic characteristics was observed. In the hand-held ECG recorder group a total of 13 PAF screenings (11.4%) were detected compared with 7 (2,8%) in the Holter group (P=0.001). Conclusions. A prolonged intermittent screening is a better method than a shorter continuous screening in terms of detecting PAF after ischemic stroke and TIA.

Development and validation of a score to detect paroxysmal atrial fibrillation after stroke

Neurology ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 92 (2) ◽  
pp. e115-e124 ◽  
Author(s):  
Timo Uphaus ◽  
Mark Weber-Krüger ◽  
Martin Grond ◽  
Gerrit Toenges ◽  
Antje Jahn-Eimermacher ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Atrial Fibrillation ◽  
Ischemic Stroke ◽  
Confidence Interval ◽  
Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation ◽  
Odds Ratio ◽  
Holter Monitoring ◽  
Stroke Severity ◽  
Ecg Monitoring ◽  
Nihss Score ◽  
Number Needed To Screen

ObjectiveProlonged monitoring times (72 hours) are recommended to detect paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (pAF) after ischemic stroke but this is not yet clinical practice; therefore, an individual patient selection for prolonged ECG monitoring might increase the diagnostic yield of pAF in a resource-saving manner.MethodsWe used individual patient data from 3 prospective studies (ntotal = 1,556) performing prolonged Holter-ECG monitoring (at least 72 hours) and centralized data evaluation after TIA or stroke in patients with sinus rhythm. Based on the TRIPOD (Transparent Reporting of a Multivariable Prediction Model for Individual Prognosis or Diagnosis) guideline, a clinical score was developed on one cohort, internally validated by bootstrapping, and externally validated on 2 other studies.ResultspAF was detected in 77 of 1,556 patients (4.9%) during 72 hours of Holter monitoring. After logistic regression analysis with variable selection, age and the qualifying stroke event (categorized as stroke severity with NIH Stroke Scale [NIHSS] score ≤5 [odds ratio 2.4 vs TIA; 95% confidence interval 0.8–6.9, p = 0.112] or stroke with NIHSS score >5 [odds ratio 7.2 vs TIA; 95% confidence interval 2.4–21.8, p < 0.001]) were found to be predictive for the detection of pAF within 72 hours of Holter monitoring and included in the final score (Age: 0.76 points/year, Stroke Severity NIHSS ≤5 = 9 points, NIHSS >5 = 21 points; to Find AF [AS5F]). The high-risk group defined by AS5F is characterized by a predicted risk between 5.2% and 40.8% for detection of pAF with a number needed to screen of 3 for the highest observed AS5F points within the study population. Regarding the low number of outcomes before generalization of AS5F, the results need replication.ConclusionThe AS5F score can select patients for prolonged ECG monitoring after ischemic stroke to detect pAF.Classification of evidenceThis study provides Class I evidence that the AS5F score accurately identifies patients with ischemic stroke at a higher risk of pAF.

The Role of HbA1c on Mortality in Patients with Medical History of Ischemic Stroke and Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation

Diabetes ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 67 (Supplement 1) ◽  
pp. 2406-PUB
Author(s):  
KONSTANTINA KANELLOPOULOU ◽  
IOANNIS L. MATSOUKIS ◽  
ASIMINA GANOTOPOULOU ◽  
THEODORA ATHANASOPOULOU ◽  
CHRYSOULA TRIANTAFILLOPOULOU ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Atrial Fibrillation ◽  
Ischemic Stroke ◽  
Medical History ◽  
Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation ◽  
History Of

Abstract WP226: Short Lasting Runs (<30 sec) of Atrial Fibrillation are More Commonly Observed in Ischemic Stroke Patients in Comparison to Controls

Stroke ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 47 (suppl_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Ethem Murat Arsava ◽  
Ezgi Yetim ◽  
Ugur Canpolat ◽  
Necla Ozer ◽  
Kudret Aytemir ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Atrial Fibrillation ◽  
Ischemic Stroke ◽  
Multivariate Analyses ◽  
Holter Monitoring ◽  
Female Gender ◽  
Prior History ◽  
Consecutive Series ◽  
Stroke Patients ◽  
Cross Sectional ◽  
History Of

Background: The role of short-lasting (<30 sec) runs of atrial fibrillation (AF) in ischemic stroke pathophysiology is currently unknown. Although these non-sustained attacks are considered as a risk factor for future development of longer lasting, classical AF episodes, prior research has highlighted that associated clinical stroke features are not entirely similar between these two types of arrhythmias. In this study we determined the prevalence of short-lasting AF in stroke-free controls and compared it to a consecutive series of ischemic stroke patients. Methods: A total 235 controls, without any prior history stroke or AF, were evaluated with ECG and 24-hour Holter monitoring for the presence of <30-sec or ≥30-sec lasting AF episodes. The results were compared to a consecutive series of ischemic stroke patients without prior history of AF (n=456). Univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to determine demographic and cardiovascular factors related to <30-sec lasting AF and its association with ischemic stroke. Results: Expectedly, the frequency of newly diagnosed ≥30-sec lasting AF, detected either on ECG or Holter monitoring, was significantly higher in patients with ischemic stroke (18% vs. 2%; p<0.01). Non-sustained AF was positively related to old age (p<0.01), female gender (p=0.01) and hypertension (p<0.01) in univariate analyses. In multivariate analyses, after adjustment for demographic and cardiovascular risk factors, presence of non-sustained AF was significantly higher among both cryptogenic (OR 1.78; 95% CI 1.02-3.10) and non-cryptogenic (OR 1.84; 95% CI 1.15-2.94) stroke patients with respect to controls. Conclusion: Our study shows a higher prevalence of non-sustained AF episodes in ischemic stroke patients in comparison to controls. Whether this cross-sectional association translates into causality in terms of stroke pathophysiology will be the subject of future studies.

Abstract 18649: Long-term Outcome and the Mechanisms of Pulmonary Antrum Radial-linear Ablation in Patients With Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation

Circulation ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 132 (suppl_3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Xue Zhao ◽  
Jianqiang Hu ◽  
Yan Huang ◽  
Yawei Xu ◽  
Yanzhou Zhang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Atrial Fibrillation ◽  
Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation ◽  
Holter Monitoring ◽  
Pericardial Tamponade ◽  
Term Outcome ◽  
Long Term Outcome ◽  
Long Term Follow Up ◽  
One Year

Objectives: The aim of this study was to determine the mechanisms and effectiveness of pulmonary antrum radial-linear (PAR) ablation in comparison with pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) in patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (AF) after a long-term follow-up. Background: The one-year follow up data suggested that PAR ablation appeared to have a better outcome over the conventional PVI for paroxysmal AF. Methods: The enrollment occurred between March, 2011, and August, 2011, with the last follow-up in May, 2014. A total of 133 patients with documented paroxysmal AF were enrolled from 5 centers and randomized to PAR group or PVI group. Event ECG recorder and Holter monitoring were conductedduring the follow-up for all patients. Results: The average procedure time was 151±23 min in PAR group and 178±43 min in PVI group ( P <0.001). The average fluoroscopy time was 21±7 min in PAR group and 27±11 min in PVI group ( P= 0.002). AF triggering foci were eliminated in 59 patients (89.4%) in PAR group, whereas, only 4 patients (6.0%) in PVI group (P<0.001).At median 36 (37-35) months of follow-up after single ablation procedure, 43 of 66 patients in PAR group (65%) and 28 of 67 patients in PVI group (42%) had no recurrence of AF off antiarrhythmic drug (AAD) (P=0.007); and 47 of 66 patients in PAR group (71%) and 32 of 67 patients in PVI group (48%) had no recurrence of AF with AAD (P=0.006). At the last follow-up, the burden of AF was significantly lower in PAR group than in PVI group (0.9% ± 2.3% vs 4.9% ± 9.9%;90th percentile, 5.5% vs 19.6%; P=0.008). No major adverse event (death, stroke, PV stenosis) was observed in all the patients except one case of pericardial tamponade. Conclusions: PAR ablation is a simple, safe, and effective strategy for the treatment of paroxysmal AF with better long-term outcome than PVI. PAR ablation might exhibit the beneficial effect on AF management through multiple mechanisms. Registration: ChiCTR-TRC-11001191

scholarly journals Detection of Subclinical Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation and Its Correlation with Candidate Genes in Patients with Cryptogenic Ischemic Stroke and TIA

2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (2) ◽  
pp. 42-53
Author(s):  
A Petrovicova ◽  
E Kurca ◽  
A Andrasova ◽  
J Bernatova ◽  
P Blasko ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Atrial Fibrillation ◽  
Ischemic Stroke ◽  
Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation ◽  
Cryptogenic Stroke ◽  
Preventive Treatment ◽  
Correct Choice ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Nucleotide Polymorphisms ◽  
Loop Recorder ◽  
Ischemic Attack

Abstract Introduction: Cardioembolic etiology is assumed to be the most frequent cause of cryptogenic strokes. The detection of subclinical paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (AF) is important in the correct choice of preventive treatment. The aim of this prospective study was to detect the incidence of AF in patients with a cryptogenic stroke or transient ischemic attack (TIA) and to evaluate the association between the presence of AF and selected single-nucleotide polymorphisms (SNP). Methods: Patients with a cryptogenic stroke/ TIA (n=100) and a control group (n=15) of volunteers without significant cardiovascular disease were included in the study during the period of 2014 to 2019. To detect AF they underwent 12 months of ECG monitoring using an implanted loop recorder (ILR). Genotyping for SNPs rs10033464, rs2200733, rs225132, and rs2106261 was performed by a high resolution melting analysis. Results: We found AF to be present in 24 (24%) patients with a cryptogenic stroke/TIA, versus no subjects in the control group. The SNPs rs2106261, rs2200733, rs225132, and rs10033464 were not found to be associated with AF in our study (p=0.240; 1.000; 0.887; 0.589). However, a weak trend for a higher frequency of rs2106261 risk allele A homozygotes was observed in the patients with AF compared to the patients without AF (0.416 vs. 0.263, p=0.073). Homozygotes for allele A of rs2106261 were also present in a significantly higher frequency in AF patients compared to the controls (0.416 vs. 0.133, p = 0.012). Conclusion: In our study paroxysmal AF was a probable etiological factor in 24% of patients with cryptogenic ischemic stroke / TIA during the 12 months of monitoring. The homozygous allele A of rs2106261 was identified to be the possible genetic risk factor of AF, but this should be verified in larger cohorts. The study has been registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov, identifier NCT02216370.

Abstract 3648: Detection Of Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation In Patient With Acute Brain Ischemia Combining Cardiac And Holter Monitoring: Prevalence And Predictors

Stroke ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 43 (suppl_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Patricia Martinez-Sanchez ◽  
Elisa Correas Callero ◽  
Andres Cruz Herranz ◽  
Blanca Fuentes Gimeno ◽  
Angel Martin Montes ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Atrial Fibrillation ◽  
Brain Ischemia ◽  
Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation ◽  
Left Atrial ◽  
Duplex Ultrasound ◽  
Unknown Origin ◽  
Holter Monitoring ◽  
Cardiac Monitoring ◽  
Stroke Severity ◽  
Carotid Plaques

INTRODUCTION: The yield of serial electrocardiograms (ECG) plus 72-hour cardiac monitoring and Holter monitoring in detection of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (PAF) is not well known. METHODS: consecutive patients with stroke or transient ischemic attack (TIA) admitted to a Stroke Unit (SU) during January 2009-June 2010 were studied. Patients underwent serial ECG and cardiac monitoring in the first 72 hours. Furthermore, 24-hours Holter monitoring were performed in patient with brain ischemia of unknown origin or if cardiac embolism was suspected. The presence of atrial fibrillation (AF) and PAF was recorded. RESULTS: 537 patients were included, 59.6% males. Mean age 69.1 (SD 13.5) years. Previous AF was present in 15.8% patients. ECG on admission showed not previously known AF in 22 (4%) patients. Cardiac monitoring and serial ECG in the SU detected PAF in 12 (2.2%) cases more. 24-hours Holter monitoring was completed in 156 patients, in 42 cases PFA was detected, of them 6 had been previously detected by serial ECG/cardiac monitoring. One case of PAF detected by serial ECG was not confirmed by Holter monitoring. In total, 10.8% of patients were diagnosed with new PAF. In multivariate analyses, NIHSS on admission (OR 1.1 for each 1 point increase; 95% CI, 1-1.2), enlarged left atrial (OR 5.8; 95% CI, 2.8-12), absence of carotid plaques by duplex ultrasound (OR 2.1; 95% CI 1-4.4) and hyperlipidemia (OR 2.4; 95% CI 1.119-5) were predictors of PAF. CONCLUSIONS: 24-hours Holter monitoring increased by 6 fold the detection of PAF as compared to ECG plus cardiac monitoring in acute stroke patients. Stroke severity, enlarged left atrial, absence of carotid plaques and hyperlipidemia are associated with PAF.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document