scholarly journals HIFU ablation is not a proven standard treatment for localized prostate cancer

2013 ◽  
Vol 5 (6) ◽  
pp. 424
Author(s):  
Alan I. So
Keyword(s):  
Prostate Cancer ◽  
Standard Treatment ◽  
Localized Prostate Cancer ◽  
Hifu Ablation

The correlation of PSA-nadir PSА recurrence after total HIFU-ablation in patients with localized prostate cancer

Urologiia ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 4_2020 ◽  
pp. 79-83
Author(s):  
R.N. Fomkin Fomkin ◽  
G.E. Krupinov Krupinov ◽  
A.A. Churakov Churakov ◽  
T.V. Shatylko Shatylko ◽  
О.A. Fomkina Fomkina ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Prostate Cancer ◽  
Localized Prostate Cancer ◽  
Hifu Ablation ◽  
Psa Nadir

Robotic perineal radical prostatectomy in a patient with a pre-existing three piece inflatable penile prosthesis

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mustafa Gurkan Yenice ◽  
Ismail Yigitbasi ◽  
Emre Sam ◽  
Abdulmuttalip Simsek ◽  
Volkan Tugcu
Keyword(s):  
Prostate Cancer ◽  
Case Report ◽  
Radical Prostatectomy ◽  
Minimally Invasive ◽  
Surgical Procedures ◽  
Standard Treatment ◽  
Penile Prosthesis ◽  
Localized Prostate Cancer ◽  
Inflatable Penile Prosthesis ◽  
Minimally Invasive Methods

AbstractRadical prostatectomy (RP) is the primary and standard treatment for localized prostate cancer. As in many surgical procedures, RP can now be accomplished through minimally invasive methods. RP in a patient with a pre-existing 3-piece inflatable penile prosthesis (IPP) is an exceptional condition and involves coping with many difficulties. In this case report, we aimed to present a patient with pre-existing 3-piece IPP for whom we successfully performed robotic perineal RP (r-PRP).

scholarly journals Improved Apical Margins with Use of Periurethral Suspension Stitch in Robotic Assisted Radical Prostatectomy

2021 ◽  
pp. 1-4
Author(s):  
Kevin Keating ◽  
Kevin Keating ◽  
Matthew Rohloff ◽  
Thomas J. Maatman
Keyword(s):  
Prostate Cancer ◽  
Radical Prostatectomy ◽  
Gleason Score ◽  
Standard Treatment ◽  
Surgical Margin ◽  
High Volume ◽  
Localized Prostate Cancer ◽  
Prostate Cancer Treatment ◽  
Robotic Assisted ◽  
Robotic Assisted Radical Prostatectomy

Introduction: Robotic surgery has transformed the standard treatment for localized prostate cancer. Oncologic control is at the foremost concern when treating prostate cancer. Previous studies have detailed the use of a periurethral suspension stitch during robotic assisted radical prostatectomy (RARP), but none have demonstrated significant improvement in surgical margins. Objective: The purpose of this study is to illustrate the use of a periurethral suspension stitch during RARP and its impact on apical surgical margin status. Methods: This study retrospectively analysed 97 patients who underwent RARP by a single high-volume robotic surgeon (TJM) between November 2011 and February 2014. The patients were split into two cohorts with one group (Suspended Stitch) having the dorsal venous complex (DVC) ligation stitch suspended while the second group having the DVC ligation stitch unsuspended (Unsuspended Stitch). Results: Positive margins were seen in 39.6% of patients in the Unsuspended Stitch group and 20.4% of patients in the Suspended Stitch group (p=0.04). Patients in the Unsuspended Stitch group had a Gleason score > 7 in 33.3% of cases, where patients in the Suspended Stitch group had a Gleason score > 7 in 57.1% of cases. Conclusion: Localized prostate cancer treatment has significantly changed with RARP. This study provides an additional technique for achieving improved oncologic control.

1141: A Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing External Beam Radiation and Cryoablation in Localized Prostate Cancer

2007 ◽  
Vol 177 (4S) ◽  
pp. 376-377 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bryan J. Donnelly ◽  
John C. Saliken ◽  
Penny Brasher ◽  
Scott Ernst ◽  
Harold Lau ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Prostate Cancer ◽  
Randomized Controlled Trial ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Localized Prostate Cancer ◽  
External Beam Radiation ◽  
External Beam ◽  
Beam Radiation ◽  
Randomized Controlled
Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document