scholarly journals Chemotherapy intensification for first-line treatment of poor-prognosis metastatic germ cell cancer is not yet ready for prime time

2020 ◽  
Vol 14 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Di Maria Jiang ◽  
Robert J. Hamilton ◽  
Aaron R. Hansen
Keyword(s):  
Germ Cell ◽  
Poor Prognosis ◽  
Cell Cancer ◽  
Germ Cell Cancer ◽  
Prime Time ◽  
Line Treatment ◽  
First Line ◽  
First Line Treatment

Treatment of Relapse of Clinical Stage I Nonseminomatous Germ Cell Tumors on Surveillance

2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (22) ◽  
pp. 1919-1926 ◽  
Author(s):  
Robert J. Hamilton ◽  
Madhur Nayan ◽  
Lynn Anson-Cartwright ◽  
Eshetu G. Atenafu ◽  
Philippe L. Bedard ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Germ Cell ◽  
Odds Ratio ◽  
Clinical Stage ◽  
Germ Cell Tumors ◽  
Stage I ◽  
Line Treatment ◽  
First Line ◽  
Factors Associated ◽  
Nonseminomatous Germ Cell Tumors ◽  
First Line Treatment

PURPOSE Active surveillance (AS) for testicular nonseminomatous germ cell tumors (NSGCT) is widely used. Although there is no consensus for optimal treatment at relapse on surveillance, globally patients typically receive chemotherapy. We describe treatment of relapses in our non–risk-adapted NSGCT AS cohort and highlight selective use of primary retroperitoneal lymph node dissection (RPLND). METHODS From December 1980 to December 2015, 580 patients with clinical stage I NSGCT were treated with AS, and 162 subsequently relapsed. First-line treatment was based on relapse site and extent. Logistic regression was used to explore factors associated with need for multimodal therapy on AS relapse. RESULTS Median time to relapse was 7.4 months. The majority of relapses were confined to the retroperitoneum (66%). After relapse, first-line treatment was chemotherapy for 95 (58.6%) and RPLND for 62 (38.3%), and five patients (3.1%) underwent other therapy. In 103 (65.6%), only one modality of treatment was required: chemotherapy only in 58 of 95 (61%) and RPLND only in 45 of 62 (73%). Factors associated with multimodal relapse therapy were larger node size (odds ratio, 2.68; P = .045) in patients undergoing chemotherapy and elevated tumor markers (odds ratio, 6.05; P = .008) in patients undergoing RPLND. When RPLND was performed with normal markers, 82% required no further treatment. Second relapse occurred in 30 of 162 patients (18.5%). With median follow-up of 7.6 years, there were five deaths (3.1% of AS relapses, but 0.8% of whole AS cohort) from NSGCT or treatment complications. CONCLUSION The retroperitoneum is the most common site of relapse in clinical stage I NSGCT on AS. Most are cured by single-modality treatment. RPLND should be considered for relapsed patients, especially those with disease limited to the retroperitoneum and normal markers, as an option to avoid chemotherapy.

scholarly journals Individualizing Systemic Therapies in First Line Treatment and beyond for Advanced Renal Cell Carcinoma

Cancers ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 12 (12) ◽  
pp. 3750
Author(s):  
Yasir Khan ◽  
Timothy D. Slattery ◽  
Lisa M. Pickering
Keyword(s):  
Renal Cell ◽  
Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Cell Cancer ◽  
Predictive Biomarkers ◽  
Therapeutic Options ◽  
Current Status ◽  
Vegf Receptor ◽  
Line Treatment ◽  
First Line ◽  
First Line Treatment

Therapeutic options for treating advanced renal cell cancer (RCC) are rapidly evolving. Vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF)-directed therapy, predominantly VEGF receptor (VEGFr) tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) had been the most effective first line treatment since 2005 irrespective of International Metastatic RCC Database Consortium (IMDC) risk stratification. However, immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) have recently changed the treatment paradigm for advanced RCC particularly as the first-line systemic treatment modality. The combination of Ipilimumab and Nivolumab provides better disease control and long-term outcomes compared with the anti-VEGFr TKI Sunitinib for IMDC intermediate- to poor-risk patients and we now have the option of using ICI with TKI upfront for all IMDC risk groups. This poses a challenge for physicians, both to select the most suitable first line regimen and the most suitable subsequent therapy given the lack of data about sequencing in this setting. This treatment landscape is expected to become more complex with the emerging treatment options. Moreover, these therapeutic options cannot be generalized as significant variability exists between individual’s disease biologies and their physiologies for handling treatment adverse effects. Notable efforts are being made to identify promising predictive biomarkers ranging from neo-antigen load to gene expression profiling. These biomarkers need prospective validation to justify their utility in clinical practice and in treatment decision making. This review article discusses various clinicopathological characteristics that should be carefully evaluated to help select appropriate treatment and discusses the current status of biomarker-based selection.

Secondary leukemia after first-line high-dose chemotherapy for patients with advanced germ cell cancer

2004 ◽  
Vol 131 (4) ◽  
pp. 255-260 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. Wierecky ◽  
C. Kollmannsberger ◽  
I. Boehlke ◽  
M. Kuczyk ◽  
J. Schleicher ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Germ Cell ◽  
Cell Cancer ◽  
High Dose Chemotherapy ◽  
Germ Cell Cancer ◽  
High Dose ◽  
Secondary Leukemia ◽  
First Line

Phase II study of nimotuzumab combination with paclitaxel and cisplatin as the first-line treatment in patients with local advanced or metastatic esophageal squamous cell cancer (ESCC): An interim analysis.

2012 ◽  
Vol 30 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e14604-e14604
Author(s):  
Xiaodong Zhang ◽  
Ming Lu ◽  
Jifang Gong ◽  
Jing Gao ◽  
Xicheng Wang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Phase Ii ◽  
Interim Analysis ◽  
Phase Ii Study ◽  
Treatment Plan ◽  
Cell Cancer ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Line Treatment ◽  
First Line ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
First Line Treatment

e14604 Background: Nimotuzumab is a genetically engineered humanized antibody (mAb) that recognizes an epitope located in the extracellular domain of human EGFR. Evidences have shown that nimotuzumab is effective and safe in SCCHN. The combination of paclitaxel/cisplatin (TP) is a standard regimen for advanced or metastatic ESCC. This open uncontrolled phase II study was designed to determine the efficacy and safety of nimotuzumab in combination with TP as the first-line treatment in advanced ESCC. Methods: All patients have histology/cytology confirmed advanced or metastatic ESCC with ECOG PS 0-2. The treatment plan is as the following: paclitaxel administered intravenously (IV) 175 mg/m2 on d1 and cisplatin IV 30-35mg/ m2/d on d1-2, every 21 days for 6 cycles, and nimotuzumab IV 200mg weekly. For patients with stable disease (SD) and better, nimotuzumab will be given continuously after 6 cycles of TP. The primary endpoint is objective response rate (RR) with 56 patients enrollment (target RR >60%); secondary endpoints were progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS) and safety/ tolerability. The coordinations between EGFR and ERCC1 with response of treatment will be analyzed. Results: Up to date, 25 patients (male/female, 20/5; median age 58) have been enrolled. All patients were evaluated for toxicity and 22 are evaluable for response. 14 (63.6%) had a confirmed partial response (PR) and 7 (31.8%) had SD as their best responses with disease control rate of 95.4%. Only one patient had progressive disease (PD). Grade 3 or 4 neutropenia, neutropenic fever and anemia occurred in 52.2%, 4% and 13% respectively. Nonhematological toxicities were generally mild with grade 1 or 2 alopecie, hypodynamia, anorexia, nausea, arthralgia, and itch of skin occurring in 80%, 60.9%, 43.5%, 34.8%, 30.4%, and 21.7%. One patient had a grade 3 haematuria. Conclusions: The interim analysis showed that the combination of nimotuzumab with TP is tolerated reasonably well in patients with advanced or metastatic ESCC and encouraging efficacy. The study is ongoing with coordination of biomarkers and response as well.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document