The neotropical fish family Chilodontidae (Teleostei: Characiformes) : a phylogenetic study and a revision of Caenotropus Günther

Author(s):  
Richard P. Vari ◽  
Ricardo M. C. Castro ◽  
Sandra J. Raredon
2020 ◽  
Vol 153 ◽  
pp. 106945
Author(s):  
Nadayca T.B. Mateussi ◽  
Bruno F. Melo ◽  
Rafaela P. Ota ◽  
Fábio F. Roxo ◽  
Luz E. Ochoa ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  

2003 ◽  
Vol 81 (12) ◽  
pp. 1938-1946 ◽  
Author(s):  
Huanzhang Liu ◽  
Yiyu Chen

With 210 genera and 2010 species, Cyprinidae is the largest freshwater fish family in the world. Several papers, based on morphological and molecular data, have been published and have led to some solid conclusions, such as the close relationships between North American phoxinins and European leuciscins. However, the relationships among major subgroups of this family are still not well resolved, especially for those East Asian groups. In the present paper, the mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) control region, 896–956 base pairs, of 17 representative species of East Asian cyprinids was sequenced and compared with those of 21 other cyprinids to study their phylogenetic relationships. After alignment, there were 1051 sites. The comparison between pairwise substitutions and HKY distances showed that the mtDNA control region was suitable for phylogenetic study. Phylogenetic analysis indicated that there are two principal lineages in Cyprinidae: Cyprinine and Leuciscine. In Cyprinine, the relationships could be a basal Labeoinae, an intermediate Cyprininae, and a diversified Barbinae (including Schizothroaxinae). In Leuciscine, Rasborinae is at the basal position; Gobioninae and Leuciscinae are sister groups; the East Asian cultrin–xenocyprinin taxa form a large mono phyl etic group with some small affiliated groups; and the positions of Acheilognathinae and Tincinae are still uncertain.


Zootaxa ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 4658 (1) ◽  
pp. 193-196
Author(s):  
MONICA SILREY CELIS-GRANADA ◽  
SEBASTIÁN MEDINA ◽  
CAMILO BELTRÁN

The Neotropical fish family Loricariidae is the most diverse family of catfishes (order Siluriformes) and the fifth largest fish family, with approximately 993 valid species. The species of the family are geographically distributed from Costa Rica in Central America to Argentina in South America and are grouped into 83 genera and the following six subfamilies: Hypoptopomatinae, Hypostominae, Loricariinae Delturinae, Lithogeninae and Rhinelepinae (Roberto et al., 2006, Birindelli et al., 2007, Corea et al., 2014, Eschmeyer & Fong, 2019).


Data in Brief ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 9 ◽  
pp. 128-142 ◽  
Author(s):  
Benjamin W. Frable ◽  
Bruno F. Melo ◽  
Brian L. Sidlauskas ◽  
Kendra Hoekzema ◽  
Richard P. Vari ◽  
...  

Zootaxa ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 4701 (5) ◽  
pp. 497-500 ◽  
Author(s):  
ROBERTO E. REIS ◽  
HERALDO A. BRITSKI ◽  
MARCELO R. BRITTO ◽  
PAULO A. BUCKUP ◽  
BÁRBARA B. CALEGARI ◽  
...  

A recent study based on genomic data by Roxo et al. (2019) provided a phylogeny of the Loricariidae, the largest catfish family and second largest Neotropical fish family with approximately 1,000 species. The study represents a valuable and innovative contribution for understanding higher-level relationships within the family. The phylogenetic tree inferred by Roxo et al. (2019) thoroughly corroborates the monophyly and relationships of most currently accepted subfamilies of Loricariidae, based on a fair taxon sampling (nearly 14% of the species in the family) representing most genera of each but one of the subfamilies, the Lithogeninae, the sister-group of the remaining members of the family (Pereira & Reis, 2017; Reis et al., 2017). In addition to a hypothesis of relationships, Roxo et al. (2019) also proposed a series of lower-level taxonomic changes, which are deemed premature considering that the taxonomic sampling of the study targeted higher-level clades, and go against one of the pillars of biological classification: nomenclatural stability (e.g., Heterick & Majer, 2018; Beninger & Backeljau, 2019). Here we (1) discuss implications of inadequate taxonomic sampling as a basis for changes in classification of species; (2) explain why the taxonomic sampling design of Roxo et al. (2019) is inadequate for the proposed nomenclatural changes; and (3) advocate that changes to classifications must be grounded on phylogenies with dense sampling of taxa at the relevant level. 


2020 ◽  
Vol 18 (2) ◽  
pp. 181-191 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tiago M. S. Freitas ◽  
Luciano F. A. Montag ◽  
Paulo De Marco ◽  
JoaquÍn Hortal

2016 ◽  
Vol 102 ◽  
pp. 189-201 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bruno F. Melo ◽  
Brian L. Sidlauskas ◽  
Kendra Hoekzema ◽  
Benjamin W. Frable ◽  
Richard P. Vari ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document