scholarly journals Single port access laparoscopic surgery for large adnexal tumors: Initial 51 cases of a single institute

2017 ◽  
Vol 60 (1) ◽  
pp. 32
Author(s):  
Bo Ra Cho ◽  
Jae Won Han ◽  
Tae Hyun Kim ◽  
Ae Ra Han ◽  
Sung Eun Hur ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Laparoscopic Surgery ◽  
Single Port ◽  
Single Port Access ◽  
Port Access ◽  
Adnexal Tumors

Single-port-access, hand-assisted laparoscopic surgery for benign large adnexal tumors versus single-port pure laparoscopic surgery for adnexal tumors

2011 ◽  
Vol 26 (3) ◽  
pp. 693-703 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hyun-Jin Roh ◽  
Soo-Jeong Lee ◽  
Jun-Woo Ahn ◽  
Yong-Soon Kwon ◽  
Hyun-Jin Cho ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Laparoscopic Surgery ◽  
Single Port ◽  
Single Port Access ◽  
Port Access ◽  
Adnexal Tumors

Learning Curve for Single-Port-Access Laparoscopic Surgery in Benign Adnexal Mass

2010 ◽  
Vol 17 (6) ◽  
pp. S148
Author(s):  
Y.H. Kim ◽  
H.H. Chung ◽  
N-H. Park ◽  
Y-S. Song ◽  
S-B. Kang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Laparoscopic Surgery ◽  
Learning Curve ◽  
Adnexal Mass ◽  
Single Port ◽  
Single Port Access ◽  
Port Access

scholarly journals Modified glove method for single port access laparoscopic surgery

2010 ◽  
Vol 26 (2) ◽  
pp. 595-599
Author(s):  
Goichiro Kasai ◽  
Atsushi Fukui ◽  
Hachidai Hirakawa ◽  
Kazuhiro Abe ◽  
Akiko Kasai ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Laparoscopic Surgery ◽  
Single Port ◽  
Single Port Access ◽  
Port Access

scholarly journals Single Port Access Laparoscopic Surgery via Three Approaches: SILS, SSL, and EZ Access

2012 ◽  
Vol 28 (2) ◽  
pp. 667-672
Author(s):  
Rie Ikeuchi ◽  
Yukari Mukai ◽  
Naoto Yoneda ◽  
Tadashi Takeshita
Keyword(s):  
Laparoscopic Surgery ◽  
Single Port ◽  
Single Port Access ◽  
Port Access

Single-port access laparoscopic surgery for complex Crohnʼs disease

2010 ◽  
Vol 16 (8) ◽  
pp. 1273-1274 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anna Heeney ◽  
Donal B. OʼConnor ◽  
Sean Martin ◽  
Desmond C. Winter
Keyword(s):  
Laparoscopic Surgery ◽  
Single Port ◽  
Single Port Access ◽  
Port Access

Single-Port Access Laparoscopic Surgery in Gynecologic Oncology: Outcomes and Feasibility

2014 ◽  
Vol 24 (6) ◽  
pp. 1126-1132 ◽  
Author(s):  
Justine Figurelli ◽  
Lucie Bresson ◽  
Fabrice Narducci ◽  
Ninad Katdare ◽  
Pascale Coulon ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Laparoscopic Surgery ◽  
Single Port ◽  
Gynecologic Oncology ◽  
Conventional Laparoscopic Surgery ◽  
Single Port Access ◽  
Port Access ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Case Files ◽  
Secondary Objective ◽  
Hospital Stays

ObjectivesSingle-port access laparoscopic surgery (SPALS) is supposed to simplify and improve the outcomes of current multiport laparoscopic procedures. This retrospective study was performed to assess the actual outcomes of SPALS in 2 simple gynecological oncology procedures, namely, diagnostic laparoscopy and bilateral adnexectomy.MethodsWe conducted a retrospective monocentric study. Case files of only those women who underwent bilateral adnexectomies and diagnostic and/or staging laparoscopy were studied with respect to the operative room time, intraoperative and postoperative complications, postoperative pain, and lengths of hospital stays. The main objective was to assess the feasibility and utility of SPALS surgery in gynecology. The secondary objective was to compare this group with a cohort of patients with multiport conventional laparoscopic surgery (MPCLS) performed during the same period.ResultsFrom December 2009 to March 2013, there were 134 patients who underwent these 2 procedures. Eighty adnexectomies were performed, 41 by SPALS and 39 by MPCLS. Fifty-four diagnostic laparoscopies were performed, with 27 patients in each group. In the group of adnexectomies, operative time was significantly lower in SPALS compared with MPCLS (36 vs 59 minutes, P < 10−4) and also compared with the postoperative stay (1 vs 2.2 nights, P < 10−4). By contrast, no significant difference was observed between the 2 methods of access in all the parameters studied in the group of diagnostic laparoscopies.ConclusionsOur experience demonstrates that SPALS is feasible and safe for simple gynecological procedures. This approach may result in a smooth postoperative course and shorter hospital stay and can thus be promoted to a day care procedure.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document