“I’m just being honest.” Ethical justifications enable interpersonal harm

2018 ◽  
Vol 2018 (1) ◽  
pp. 11005
Author(s):  
Emma Levine
Keyword(s):  
Interpersonal Harm

Predicting perceived harmful intent from the Dark Tetrad: A novel cognitive account of interpersonal harm

2019 ◽  
Vol 147 ◽  
pp. 43-52 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gregory K. Tortoriello ◽  
William Hart ◽  
Kyle Richardson
Keyword(s):  
Interpersonal Harm

Interpersonal harm aversion as a necessary foundation for morality: A developmental neuroscience perspective

2017 ◽  
Vol 30 (1) ◽  
pp. 153-164 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jean Decety ◽  
Jason M. Cowell
Keyword(s):  
Developmental Psychology ◽  
Social Contexts ◽  
Third Party ◽  
Cognitive Mechanisms ◽  
Social Evaluation ◽  
Hedonic Value ◽  
Developmental Neuroscience ◽  
Approach Avoidance ◽  
Computational Processes ◽  
Interpersonal Harm

AbstractGrowing evidence from developmental psychology and social neuroscience emphasizes the importance of third-party harm aversion for constructing morality. A sensitivity to interpersonal harm emerges very early in ontogeny, as reflected in both the capacity for implicit social evaluation and an aversion for antisocial agents. Yet it does not necessarily entail avoidance toward inflicting pain to others. Later, an understanding that harmful actions cause suffering emerges, followed by an integration of rules that can depend on social contexts and cultures. These developmental findings build on a burgeoning literature, which suggests that the fundamental nature of moral and social cognition, including their motivational and hedonic value, lies in general computational processes such as attention, approach–avoidance, social valuation, and decision making rather than in fully distinct, dedicated neural regions for morality. Bridging the gap between cognition and behaviors and the requisite affective, motivational, and cognitive mechanisms, a developmental neuroscience approach enriches our understanding of the emergence of morality.

The role of interpersonal harm in distinguishing regret from guilt.

Emotion ◽  
2008 ◽  
Vol 8 (5) ◽  
pp. 589-596 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marcel Zeelenberg ◽  
Seger M. Breugelmans
Keyword(s):  
Interpersonal Harm

scholarly journals The necessity for human solidarity in Arthur Miller’s All My Sons

2020 ◽  
Vol 7 (6) ◽  
pp. 686-695
Author(s):  
Mostafa Saber Abdel-Hamid Mowaad
Keyword(s):  
Prosocial Behavior ◽  
Interpersonal Relationships ◽  
Air Force ◽  
American Dream ◽  
Human Values ◽  
Human Tendency ◽  
All My Sons ◽  
Better Than ◽  
Interpersonal Harm

Arthur Miller’s All My Sons depicts the human tendency of self-deception, betrayal and guilt which leads to the deterioration and the collapse of human values. The intensity of these elements may vary but they run through all of his plays. In All My Sons, Joe, a selfish businessman, in order to save his business from ruin, supplies defective cylinder heads to the American Air Force which results in the death of 21 fighter plane pilots. Joe atones for his crime by committing suicide. According to Miller, the American Dream creates false hopes that prevent people from being proud of what they have accomplished to make their lives better than they would be elsewhere, and eventually fail at achieving anything. Guilt is fundamentally a prosocial behavior because it strengthens interpersonal relationships. It is a kind of regretful, remorseful, painful, and aversive feeling aroused by one’s own actions or inactions. Guilt is different from regret in that guilt is more related to interpersonal harm whereas regret is more related to intrapersonal harm. Guilt is usually related to and is operationalized as the acceptance of responsibility for harm. Guilt has long been related to prosocial behavior. People tend to use altruistic means when under the stress of guilt.1

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document