scholarly journals Improvement in Cervical Range of Motion After Thrust and Grade Iii Maitland Mobilization of Thoracic Spine in Patients with Postural Neck Pain -A randomized controlled trail

2019 ◽  
Vol 8 (2) ◽  
pp. 67
Author(s):  
Sumaira Parveen ◽  
Tahir Mahmood ◽  
Muhammad Khizer ◽  
Rizwan Haider
Keyword(s):  
Neck Pain ◽  
Range Of Motion ◽  
Thoracic Spine ◽  
Cervical Range Of Motion ◽  
Randomized Controlled ◽  
Randomized Controlled Trail ◽  
Grade Iii

Effectiveness of kinesio taping in addition to conventional rehabilitation treatment on pain, cervical range of motion and quality of life in patients with neck pain: A randomized controlled trial

2018 ◽  
Vol 31 (3) ◽  
pp. 453-464 ◽  
Author(s):  
María Carmen Puerma-Castillo ◽  
María Carmen García-Ríos ◽  
Marta Eloisa Pérez-Gómez ◽  
María Encarnación Aguilar-Ferrándiz ◽  
María Isabel Peralta-Ramírez
Keyword(s):  
Quality Of Life ◽  
Randomized Controlled Trial ◽  
Neck Pain ◽  
Range Of Motion ◽  
Controlled Trial ◽  
Rehabilitation Treatment ◽  
Cervical Range Of Motion ◽  
Randomized Controlled ◽  
Kinesio Taping

scholarly journals Effects of the Manual Therapy Approach of Segments C0-1 and C2-3 in the Flexion-Rotation Test in Patients with Chronic Neck Pain: A Randomized Controlled Trial

2021 ◽  
Vol 18 (2) ◽  
pp. 753
Author(s):  
Jacobo Rodríguez-Sanz ◽  
Miguel Malo-Urriés ◽  
María Orosia Lucha-López ◽  
Albert Pérez-Bellmunt ◽  
Andoni Carrasco-Uribarren ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Neck Pain ◽  
Pain Intensity ◽  
Range Of Motion ◽  
Manual Therapy ◽  
Chronic Neck Pain ◽  
Exercise Session ◽  
Cervical Range Of Motion ◽  
Rotation Test ◽  
Randomized Controlled ◽  
Side Bending

Background: Flexion-rotation test predominantly measures rotation in C1-2 segment. Restriction in flexion-rotation may be due to direct limitation in C1-2, but also to a premature tightening of the alar ligament as a result of lack of movement in C0-1 or C2-3. The aim of this study was to compare the effect of a 20-min single cervical exercise session, with or without manual therapy of C0-1 and C2-3 segment in flexion-rotation test, in patients with chronic neck pain and positive flexion-rotation test. Methods: Randomized controlled clinical trial in 48 subjects (24 manual therapy+exercise/24 exercise). Range of motion and pain during flexion-rotation test, neck pain intensity and active cervical range of motion were measured before and after the intervention. Results: Significant differences were found in favour of the manual therapy group in the flexion-rotation test: right (p < 0.001) and left rotation (p < 0.001); pain during the flexion-rotation test: right (p < 0.001) and left rotation (p < 0.001); neck pain intensity: (p < 0.001); cervical flexion (p < 0.038), extension (p < 0.010), right side-bending (p < 0.035), left side-bending (p < 0.002), right rotation (p < 0.001), and left rotation (p < 0.006). Conclusions: Addition of one C0-C1 and C2-C3 manual therapy session to cervical exercise can immediately improve flexion-rotation test and cervical range of motion and reduce pain intensity.

Immediate effects of thoracic manipulation on cervical joint position sense in individuals with mechanical neck pain: A randomized controlled trial

2021 ◽  
pp. 1-9
Author(s):  
Emin Ulas Erdem ◽  
Banu Ünver ◽  
Eda Akbas ◽  
Gizem Irem Kinikli
Keyword(s):  
Neck Pain ◽  
Range Of Motion ◽  
Position Sense ◽  
Joint Position Sense ◽  
Position Error ◽  
Cervical Region ◽  
Joint Position ◽  
Cervical Range Of Motion ◽  
Arm Pain ◽  
Neck Function

BACKGROUND: Performing thoracic manipulations for neck pain can result in immediate improvements in neck function. OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to investigate the immediate effects of thoracic manipulation on cervical joint position sense and cervical range of motion in individuals with chronic mechanical neck pain. METHODS: Eighty male volunteers between 18–25 years and having chronic or recurrent neck or shoulder pain of at least 3 months duration with or without arm pain were randomized into two groups: Thoracic Manipulation Group (TMG:50) and Control Group (CG:30), with a pretest-posttest experimental design. The TMG was treated with thoracic extension manipulation while the CG received no intervention. Cervical joint position error and cervical range of motion of the individuals were assessed at baseline and 5 minutes later. RESULTS: There was no difference in demographic variables such as age (p= 0.764), Body Mass Index (p= 0.917) and Neck Pain Disability Scale (NPDS) scores (p= 0.436) at baseline outcomes between TMG and CGs. Joint position error outcomes between the two groups following intervention were similar in all directions at 30 and 50 degrees. Differences in range of motion following intervention in neck flexion (p< 0.001) and right rotation (p= 0.004) were higher in TMG compared to CG. CONCLUSIONS: A single session of thoracic manipulation seems to be inefficient on joint position sense in individuals with mild mechanical neck pain. However, thoracic manipulation might be an effective option to increase flexion and rotation of the cervical region as an adjunctive to treatment.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document