scholarly journals Primary Gastric Lymphoma: Conservative Treatment Modality Is Not Inferior to Surgery for Early-Stage Disease

ISRN Oncology ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 2012 ◽  
pp. 1-6 ◽  
Author(s):  
Fatih Selçukbiricik ◽  
Deniz Tural ◽  
Olgun Elicin ◽  
Selin Berk ◽  
Mustafa Özgüroğlu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Prognostic Factors ◽  
Conservative Treatment ◽  
Treatment Modality ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Gastric Lymphoma ◽  
Poor Performance ◽  
Treatment Modalities ◽  
Poor Performance Status ◽  
Advanced Stage ◽  
Primary Gastric Lymphoma

Objectives. The aim of this study was to evaluate clinical characteristics, prognostic factors, survival rates, and treatment modalities in patients with primary gastric lymphoma (PGL). Methods. We retrospectively reviewed and analyzed data from patients treated for PGL in our clinic from 1998 through 2010. Staging was performed using the Lugano Staging System. Overall and disease-free survival (OS and DFS) were calculated from the date of diagnosis. Results. We identified 79 patients. Thirty-seven patients (47%) were male. The median age at presentation was 57 (18–85) years. The median follow-up time was 41 (9–52) months. Thirty patients (38%) underwent surgery, 74 (92%) received chemotherapy, and 18 (23%) received radiotherapy. The five-year OS and DFS rates were 91.2% and 83.9%, respectively, in patients with stage I/II or IIE disease and 70.6% and 65.5%, respectively, in patients with stage IV disease ( for both rates). Treatment modality (surgical or conservative) had no impact on OS or DFS in early stages. In a multivariate analysis, poor performance status, advanced stage, and high LDH levels were significant bad prognostic factors for DFS, while advanced stage, poor performance status, and age > 60 years were significant bad prognostic factors for OS. Conclusion. Surgery provides no advantage for survival over conservative treatment; thus, conservative treatment modalities should be preferred initially at early stages of PGL.

scholarly journals Feasibility and effectiveness of afatinib for poor performance status patients with EGFR-mutation-positive non-small-cell lung cancer: a retrospective cohort study

BMC Cancer ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Chiao-En Wu ◽  
Ching-Fu Chang ◽  
Chen-Yang Huang ◽  
Cheng-Ta Yang ◽  
Chih-Hsi Scott Kuo ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Lung Cancer ◽  
Prognostic Factors ◽  
Small Cell Lung Cancer ◽  
Disease Control ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Poor Performance ◽  
Small Cell ◽  
Poor Performance Status ◽  
Small Cell Lung ◽  
Nsclc Patients

Abstract Background Afatinib is one of the standard treatments for patients with epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-mutated non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, data on the use of afatinib in patients with poor performance status (PS ≥ 2) are limited. This study aimed to retrospectively review the clinical outcomes and safety of afatinib treatment in EGFR-mutation-positive (EGFRm+) NSCLC patients with PS ≥ 2. Methods The data for 62 patients who were treated at Linkou Chang Gung Memorial Hospital from January 2010 to August 2019 were retrospectively reviewed. Patients’ clinicopathological features were obtained, and univariate and multivariate analyses were performed to identify possible prognostic factors. Data on adverse events were collected to evaluate general tolerance for afatinib therapy. Results Until February 2020, the objective response rate, disease control rate, median progression-free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS) were 58.1% (36/62), 69.4% (43/62), 8.8 months, and 12.9 months, respectively. The absence of liver metastasis (PFS: p = 0.044; OS: p = 0.061) and good disease control (p < 0.001 for PFS and OS) were independent favorable prognostic factors for PFS and OS. Bone metastasis (p = 0.036) and dose modification (reduction/interruption, p = 0.021) were predictors of disease control. Conclusion Afatinib demonstrated acceptable efficacy and safety in the current cohort. This study provided evidence to support the use of afatinib as a first-line treatment in EGFRm+ NSCLC patients with poor PS.

Was bei Tumorpatienten mit Atemwegsstenosen die Prognose bestimmt: Erst Rekanalisierung, im Anschluss andere Therapieoptionen nicht versäumen

2020 ◽  
Vol 8 (3) ◽  
pp. 148-149
Author(s):  
Manfred Wagner
Keyword(s):  
Prognostic Factors ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Survival Rates ◽  
Poor Performance ◽  
University Hospital ◽  
Poor Performance Status ◽  
Poor Survival ◽  
Interventional Bronchoscopy ◽  
Cox Proportional Hazard Regression ◽  
One Year

Background: Malignant central airway obstruction (MCAO) occurs in 20–30% of patients with primary pulmonary malignancy. Although bronchoscopic intervention is widely performed to treat MCAO, little data exist on the prognosis of interventional bronchoscopy. Therefore, we evaluated the clinical outcomes and prognostic factors of bronchoscopic interventions in patients with MCAO due to primary pulmonary malignancy. Methods: This retrospective study was conducted at a university hospital and included 224 patients who received interventional bronchoscopy from 2004 to 2017, excluding patients with salivary gland-type tumor. A multivariable Cox proportional hazard regression analysis was used to identify independent prognostic factors associated with survival after the first bronchoscopic intervention. Results: Among 224 patients, 191 (85.3%) were males, and the median age was 63 years. The most common histological type of malignancy was squamous cell carcinoma (71.0%). Technical success was achieved in 93.7% of patients. Acute complications and procedure-related death occurred in 15.6 and 1.3% of patients, respectively. The median survival time was 7.0 months, and survival rates at one year and two years were 39.7 and 28.3%, respectively. Poor survival was associated with underlying chronic pulmonary disease, poor performance status, extended lesion, extrinsic or mixed lesion, and MCAO due to disease progression and not receiving adjuvant treatment after bronchoscopic intervention. Conclusions: Interventional bronchoscopy could be a safe and effective procedure for patients who have MCAO due to primary pulmonary malignancy. In addition, we found several prognostic factors for poor survival after intervention, which will help clinicians determine the best candidates for bronchoscopic intervention.

An HHV-8 Positive HIV Negative Multicentric Castleman’s Disease, who Responded well to Rituximab Alone

2020 ◽  
Vol 20 (1) ◽  
pp. 84-86
Author(s):  
Dimitris Kounatidis ◽  
Dimitra Rontogianni ◽  
Dimitrios Sampaziotis ◽  
Maria Vardaka ◽  
Chara Giatra ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Organ Failure ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Kaposi Sarcoma ◽  
Poor Performance ◽  
Castleman Disease ◽  
Treatment Modalities ◽  
Poor Performance Status ◽  
Human Herpes Virus 8 ◽  
Life Threatening ◽  
Hiv Negative

Background: Multicentric Castleman Disease (MCD) presents with enlarged lymph nodes in multiple regions and systemic inflammatory symptoms, due to the dysregulation of cytokines, most commonly interleukin-6 (IL-6). Human herpes virus-8 (HHV-8) is strongly related to MCD (HHV-8-associated MCD) and is being implicated in cytokine dysregulation in patients, the majority of whom are HIV positive or immunosuppressed. Preferred treatment of HHV-8- associated MCD depends on the presence or not of concurrent Kaposi sarcoma and on whether the patient has life-threatening organ failure or poor performance status thought to be related to HHV- 8-associated MCD. Case Presentation: Herein, we describe a female patient with HHV-8 positive, HIV negative MCD, who responded well to the administration of rituximab once weekly for four weeks alone for three cycles. Conclusion: HHV-8 positive, HIV negative MCD treatment modalities are only anecdotal due to the rarity of this form of MCD. Administration of rituximab alone seems to be beneficial among patients with good performance status and the absence of life-threatening organ failure in cases of HHV-8 positive, HIV negative MCD.

Allogeneic HSCT for Hematologic Malignancies in 145 Patients - Identical Biologic Prognostic Factors Affect Outcome Despite Different Conditioning Regimen Intensities.

Blood ◽  
2007 ◽  
Vol 110 (11) ◽  
pp. 1087-1087
Author(s):  
Damiano Rondelli ◽  
Sandeep Chunduri ◽  
Lisa Dobogai ◽  
Jayesh Mehta
Keyword(s):  
Risk Factors ◽  
Prognostic Factors ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Poor Performance ◽  
Hematologic Malignancies ◽  
Poor Performance Status ◽  
Donor Age ◽  
Gvhd Prophylaxis ◽  
Related Risk ◽  
Conditioning Regimens

Abstract Analysis of pre-transplant variables affecting the outcome of allogeneic HSCT after 100 mg/m2 melphalan (± 50 mg/kg cyclophosphamide depending upon prior autograft) in 91 adult patients with hematologic malignancies identified refractory disease, poor performance status (ECOG 2/3), elevated LDH, and donor age >45 years as significant adverse prognostic factors affecting overall survival (OS) (Mehta et al. ASH 2006, BMT 2006). GVHD prophylaxis comprised cyclosporine-mycophenolate (HLA-matched siblings) or tacrolimus-mycophenolate (other donors). The patients were treated at NU. The outcome of 54 patients with hematologic malignancies treated at UIC with more intensive conditioning regimens was studied to see if the prognostic factors identified at NU were applicable to them. The conditioning regimens at UIC comprised 12.8 mg/kg IV busulfan + 120–160 mg/m2 fludarabine (n=36) or 140 mg/m2 melphalan + 150 mg/m2 fludarabine (n=18). Tacrolimus and methotrexate were used for GVHD prophylaxis. While the characteristics of the two patient populations were significantly different (especially diagnosis), transplant-related mortality and relapse rates were not significantly different for the two centers. As the table below shows, chemorefractory disease, poor performance status, and elevated LDH were adverse risk factors for OS in both groups of patients. Variable Mel100 (NU) BuFlu/Mel140 (UIC) (OS) RR (95% CI) P RR (95% CI) P *Note the disparity - unfavorable in the NU group and favorable in the UIC group Refractory disease 3.0 (1.7–5.0) 0.0001 4.5 (1.8–11.4) 0.002 Performance status 2/3 3.9 (2.2–6.8) <0.0001 6.0 (2.0–17.8) 0.001 Elevated LDH 2.1 (1.3–3.5) 0.004 4.2 (1.7–10.8) 0.003 Donor age >45 1.9 (1.2–3.2) * 0.009 0.24 (0.06–1.03) * 0.06 However, donor age >45, an adverse risk factor in the NU population, appeared to be a borderline favorable factor in the UIC population. HLA mismatch was found to be an additional significant adverse risk factor in the combined population when it did not reach statistical significance in either group individually. The figures below shows the effect of the number of adverse risk factors (excluding donor age) on DFS and OS in the entire group of 145 patients (P<0.0001 for each). We conclude that biologic disease-related risk factors such as chemorefractoriness and elevated LDH, and patient-related risk factors such as poor performance status appear to be applicable to allograft recipients irrespective of the intensity of the underlying transplant procedure. The reason for the disparate effect of donor age in the two groups of patients is unclear, and needs to be studied further. Figure Figure Figure Figure

Ifosfamide, Methotrexate, Etoposide, and Prednisolone (IMEP) Plus L-Asparaginase As a First-Line Therapy Improves Outcomes In Stage III/IV NK/T-Cell Lymphoma, Nasal Type (NTCL)

Blood ◽  
2013 ◽  
Vol 122 (21) ◽  
pp. 4347-4347
Author(s):  
Miso Kim ◽  
Ki Hwan Kim ◽  
Bhumsuk Keam ◽  
Se-Hoon Lee ◽  
Dong-Wan Kim ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Prognostic Factors ◽  
Treatment Outcomes ◽  
Combination Chemotherapy ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Poor Performance ◽  
Stage Iii ◽  
Poor Performance Status ◽  
Line Treatment ◽  
First Line ◽  
First Line Treatment

Abstract Background The prognosis of NTCL patients presenting in stage III/IV is extremely poor and there is no standard chemotherapy. Although L-asparaginase (L-asp) is known to be effective for NTCL, its significance has not been well demonstrated in a relatively homogenous subset. In addition, there were few studies to evaluate treatment outcomes and prognostic factors in stage III/IV NTCL. This study was undertaken to evaluate the efficacy of L-asparaginase-based combination chemotherapy (IMEP plus L-asp) and prognostic factors in stage III/IV NTCL. Methods A total of 70 patients with newly diagnosed NTCL at stage III/IV were enrolled from 3 Korean centers between Jan 2000 and Feb 2013. All patients received IMEP plus L-asp (N=22) regimens or combination chemotherapy without L-asp (N=48) as a first-line treatment. Recurrent cases were excluded. Clinical prognostic factors, treatment outcomes, and prognostic scores were compared between the groups. Independent prognostic factors for survivals were identified using multivariate analyses. Results The median age was 48.5 years (range, 18-73 years) with a male-to-female ratio of 2.2:1. After a median follow-up period of 12.8 months (range, 1.1-186.6 months), median progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were 5.6 months and 12.3 months, respectively. Clinical factors and treatment outcomes were compared between IMEP plus L-asp and chemotherapy without L-asp groups (Table 1). Higher response rate (RR) and complete response (CR) rates were observed in patients treated with IMEP plus L-asp compared with those treated with chemotherapy without L-asp (RR 90.0% vs. 34.8%, P< 0.0001; and CR rates 65.0% vs. 21.7%, P = 0.001). In addition, PFS and OS were significantly higher for IMEP plus L-asp group compared with chemotherapy without L-asp group (Table 1). Use of chemotherapy without L-asp (hazards ratio [HR]=2.29, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.22-4.29; P = 0.010) and poor performance status (HR=2.10, 95% CI 1.23-3.59; P = 0.007) were independent predictors for reduced PFS. Independent factors adversely affecting OS were poor performance status (HR=1.99, 95% CI 1.08-3.65; P = 0.027), 2 or more extranodal sites (HR=2.91, 95% CI 1.25-6.77; P = 0.013), and chemotherapy without L-asp (HR=3.51, 95% CI 1.53-8.06; P= 0.003). Conclusions L-asparaginase-based combination chemotherapy (IMEP plus L-asp) is active against stage III/IV NTCL and an independent predictor for improved survivals. L-asp containing regimen might be useful as a first-line treatment for stage III/IV NTCL. Disclosures: No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.

Patterns of Adjuvant Therapy for Endometrial Cancer: Single Institutional Experience in Thailand

2015 ◽  
Vol 25 (4) ◽  
pp. 665-672 ◽  
Author(s):  
Siriwan Tangjitgamol ◽  
Jakkapan Khunnarong ◽  
Kanyarat Katanyoo ◽  
Sunamchok Srijaipracharoen ◽  
Thaovalai Thavaramara ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Endometrial Cancer ◽  
Prognostic Factors ◽  
Adjuvant Therapy ◽  
Adjuvant Treatment ◽  
Early Stage ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Poor Performance ◽  
Tumor Grade ◽  
Poor Performance Status

AimThe aim of this study was to evaluate the use of adjuvant therapy and treatment outcomes in patients with endometrial cancer (EMC).MethodsPatients with EMC treated in the institution were identified. Data collected were age, stage of disease, histopathology, and adjuvant therapy. Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were studied.ResultsThe median age of 383 patients was 57 years (30–86 years). Majority had early-stage diseases (76.5%), endometrioid histopathology (87.2%), and high-grade tumors (74.9%). Less than half (44.4%) had adjuvant therapy. Pelvic radiation was the most common type of adjuvant treatment. We found that 25.7% of stages III to IV patients did not have adjuvant therapy (mainly from old age or poor performance status). On the other hand, 21.5% of patients with stage IA had adjuvant treatment (owing to risk factors or other synchronous cancers). The 5-year PFS and 5-year OS (95% confidence interval) were 84.3% (80.5%–88.1%) and 81.2% (77.1%–85.4%), respectively. Significant prognostic factors for survival by univariable analyses were stage, tumor grade, and histopathology. By multivariable analyses, significant prognostic factors were stage, tumor grade (only for OS), histopathology, and adjuvant therapy. Focusing on stage and adjuvant therapy, we found that the PFS and OS of early-stage patients who had or did not have adjuvant therapy were not significantly different, whereas the PFS and OS of advanced-stage patients who had adjuvant treatment were significantly higher than the PFS and OS of those who did not have adjuvant treatment.ConclusionsThe use of adjuvant therapy for patients with EMC was not according to the standard recommendation in all patients for many reasons. The benefit of adjuvant therapy was demonstrated in advanced- but not in early-stage cancer.

Prognostic Analysis for Survival in Adult Solid Organ Transplant Recipients With Post-Transplantation Lymphoproliferative Disorders

2005 ◽  
Vol 23 (30) ◽  
pp. 7574-7582 ◽  
Author(s):  
Irene M. Ghobrial ◽  
Thomas M. Habermann ◽  
Matthew J. Maurer ◽  
Susan M. Geyer ◽  
Kay M. Ristow ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Overall Survival ◽  
Prognostic Factors ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Poor Performance ◽  
Lymphoproliferative Disorders ◽  
Organ Involvement ◽  
Poor Performance Status ◽  
Solid Organ ◽  
Post Transplantation ◽  
Extranodal Disease

Purpose The objective of this study was to determine prognostic factors for overall survival in patients with post-transplantation lymphoproliferative disorders (PTLDs). Patients and Methods This study focused on the 107 adult solid organ transplantation patients who were diagnosed with PTLDs at Mayo Clinic (Rochester, MN) between December 1970 and May 2003. Results The median age at the time of diagnosis was 48 years (range, 15 to 75 years). Extranodal disease including grafted organ involvement was present in 85 patients (80%). The graft organ was involved in 30 patients (28%). At the time of these analyses, 62 patients (58%) had died. The median survival for the entire cohort was 31.5 months (95% CI, 10.7 to 72.5 months). The median follow-up of living patients was 51.8 months (range, 5.6 to 202.6 months). In univariate analyses for overall survival from the time of PTLD diagnosis, the following poor prognostic factors were identified: poor performance status with Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group levels 3 and 4 (P < .0001), grafted organ involvement (P = .0005), the presence of one or more extranodal sites (P = .005), both nodal and extranodal disease (P = .002), high International Prognostic Index (P = .006), advanced stage (P = .001), and elevated lactate dehydrogenase (P = .03). A final multivariable model for survival was constructed using three factors: poor performance status (3 to 4), monomorphic disease, and graft organ involvement. Conclusion A prognostic model has been developed for PTLD patients using one center's 30 years of experience. We propose additional confirmation and validation of these prognostic factors in larger prospective studies.

scholarly journals Suggestions for Escaping The Dark Ages for Pediatric Diffuse Intrinsic Pontine Glioma Treated with Radiotherapy: Analysis of Prognostic Factors From The National Multicenter Study

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hyun Ju Kim ◽  
Joo Ho Lee ◽  
Youngkyong Kim ◽  
Do Hoon Lim ◽  
Shin-Hyung Park ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Prognostic Factors ◽  
Therapeutic Strategy ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Poor Performance ◽  
Diffuse Intrinsic Pontine Glioma ◽  
Poor Performance Status ◽  
Pontine Glioma ◽  
Term Survival

Abstract Purpose This multicenter retrospective study aimed to investigate prognostic factors for survival, encompassing clinical and radiologic features and treatments, in newly diagnosed diffuse intrinsic pontine glioma (DIPG) patients treated with radiotherapy. Methods Patients <30 years of age who underwent radiotherapy as an initial treatment for DIPG between 2000 and 2018 were included; patients who did not undergo an MRI at diagnosis and those with pathologically diagnosed grade I glioma were excluded. We examined medical records of 162 patients collected from 10 participating centers in Korea. The patients’ clinical and radiological variables, molecular and histopathologic data, and treatment response were evaluated to identify the prognosticators for DIPG and estimate survival outcomes. Results The median follow-up period was 10.8 months (interquartile range, 7.5–18.1). The 1- and 2-year overall survival (OS) rates were 53.5% and 19.0%, respectively, with a median OS of 13.1 months. Long term survival rate (≥2 years) was 16.7%, and median OS was 43.6 months. Age (<10 years), poor performance status, treatment before 2010, and post-radiotherapy necrosis were independent prognostic factors related to poor OS in the multivariate analysis. In patients with increased post-radiotherapy necrosis, the median OS was 13.3 months for bevacizumab group and 11.4 months for no-bevacizumab group (P = 0.138). Conclusion Therapeutic strategy for DIPG has remained unchanged over time, and its prognosis remains poor. Our findings suggest that appropriate efforts are needed to reduce the occurrence of post-radiotherapy necrosis. Further well-designed clinical trials are recommended to improve the poor prognosis observed in DIPG patients.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document