scholarly journals Tissue Banking: Relationship with Blood Donor and Organ Donor Card Status

ISRN Urology ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 2012 ◽  
pp. 1-3 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kenneth D. McKenzie ◽  
Patricia E. Fitzpatrick ◽  
John D. Sheehan

Understanding the relationships among altruistic health acts may serve to aid therapeutic research advances. In this paper, we report on the links between two such behaviours—donating blood and carrying an organ donor card—and willingness to donate urological tissue to a tissue bank. Reasons for the differential willingness to do so are examined in this paper. A systematic sample of 259 new and returning attendees at a tertiary urology referral clinic in Ireland completed a self-report questionnaire in an outpatient setting. In addition to demographic details, details of known diagnosis of malignancy and family history of cancer; attitudes to tissue donation for research purposes were gauged using a 5-point Likert scale. Both blood donors and organ donor card carriers were more likely to be willing to donate tissue for research purposes. Blood donors were more likely want to know their overall results in comparison to nonblood donors and want their samples to be used for nonprofit research. Our hypothesis that being a blood donor would be a better predictor to donate urological tissue than being an organ donor card carrier borne out by the trends reported above.

1996 ◽  
Vol 43 (3) ◽  
pp. 401-408 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stephanie A. Skumanich ◽  
David P. Kintsfather

2006 ◽  
Vol 18 (4) ◽  
pp. 101-121 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tamar Ashkenazi ◽  
Giulia Miniero ◽  
Jacob Hornik

1974 ◽  
Vol 27 (9-10) ◽  
pp. 491-502 ◽  
Author(s):  
Roberta G. Simmons ◽  
John Bruce ◽  
Rita Bienvenue ◽  
Julie Fulton

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (3) ◽  
pp. 595-602
Author(s):  
Benita Stock ◽  
Luis Möckel

Abstract Objectives of this study were to analyze characteristics influencing blood donation status, to identify anxieties and reasons for (non-)blood donation, and potential channels for future blood donation campaigns. A random population from Germany was interviewed using the online survey tool SoSci Survey. The access link to the questionnaire was distributed via snowball system and the Bavarian Red Cross. Statistical analysis was performed to identify factors influencing blood donation status. A total of 682 participants (27.3% blood donors) with a mean age of 33.4 and a standard deviation (SD) of 12.0 years were included into the analysis. Strongest factor associated with being blood donor was having a blood donor within family and friends (Odds ratio [OR]: 5.05 [95% confidence interval [95% CI]: 2.63; 9.70]; p≤0.001), whereas having anxiety related to blood donation was the strongest factor for being non-blood donor (OR: 0.11 [95% CI: 0.05; 0.21] p≤0.001). Other factors significantly influencing blood donor status were age, health-related quality of life, knowledge on blood donation, being an organ donor and having pre-conditions. Main anxieties avoiding blood donation were fear of physical consequences, and fear of the injection needle. Most frequently mentioned channels which should be used for blood donation campaigns were Instagram and free TV. Involving blood donors into campaigns to recruit new blood donors from their personal environment and to focus campaign content on physical benefits of blood donations might help to recruit new blood donors. In addition, running campaigns stronger on channels such as Instagram might increase their scope.


2014 ◽  
Vol 47 (1) ◽  
pp. 25-33 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anat Peles Bortz ◽  
Tamar Ashkenazi ◽  
Semyon Melnikov

2008 ◽  
Vol 23 (1) ◽  
pp. 23-33 ◽  
Author(s):  
Susan E. Morgan ◽  
Tyler R. Harrison ◽  
Walid A. Afifi ◽  
Shawn D. Long ◽  
Michael T. Stephenson

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document