scholarly journals Near Visual Acuity Following Hyperopic Photorefractive Keratectomy in a Presbyopic Age Group

2012 ◽  
Vol 2012 ◽  
pp. 1-6 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michael Moore ◽  
Antonio Leccisotti ◽  
Claire Grills ◽  
Tara C. B. Moore
Keyword(s):  
Visual Acuity ◽  
Photorefractive Keratectomy ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Age Group ◽  
Near Vision ◽  
Corrected Visual Acuity ◽  
Uncorrected Visual Acuity ◽  
Near Visual Acuity ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Better Than

Purpose. To assess near visual acuity in a presbyopic age group following hyperopic photorefractive keratectomy (PRK). Setting. Private practice in Siena, Italy. Methods. In this retrospective single-surgeon comparative study, PRK with mitomycin C was performed to correct hyperopia using Bausch & Lomb 217z laser for 120 eyes of 60 patients in the presbyopic age group (mean spherical equivalent SE +2.38 D ± 0.71 D and mean age ). 120 eyes of 60 age-matched controls (mean age ) had their unaided near vision measured. Results. At 12 months mean SE was −0.10 D ± 0.27 D in the PRK group. Mean best corrected visual acuity (BSCVA) was log MAR; 2 eyes lost ≥0.1 log MAR. Mean uncorrected visual acuity was log MAR. Mean distance corrected near visual acuity (DCNVA) in the PRK group was . This was statistically better () than the mean unaided near visual acuity in the control group . Conclusion. PRK was found to be safe, predictable, and an effective way of correcting hyperopia in this age group. It was also found to give better than expected near vision.

scholarly journals Clinical Performance of Toris K Contact Lens in Patients with Moderate to Advanced Keratoconus: A Real Life Retrospective Analysis

2016 ◽  
Vol 2016 ◽  
pp. 1-6 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ihsan Yilmaz ◽  
Ferah Ozcelik ◽  
Berna Basarir ◽  
Gokhan Demir ◽  
Gonul Durusoy ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Visual Acuity ◽  
Contact Lens ◽  
Contact Lenses ◽  
Clinical Performance ◽  
Real Life ◽  
Soft Contact Lenses ◽  
Corrected Visual Acuity ◽  
Uncorrected Visual Acuity ◽  
Central Cone ◽  
The Mean

Objectives.To evaluate the visual performance of Toris K soft contact lenses in patients with moderate-to-advanced keratoconus and also to compare the results according to cone types, cone location, and severity of keratoconus.Materials and Methods.Sixty eyes of 40 participants were included in this retrospective study. Uncorrected visual acuity (UCVA), best-spectacle corrected visual acuity (BCVA), best-contact lens corrected visual acuity (BCLCVA), and comfort rating via visual analogue scales (VAS) were measured.Results.The mean age was 27.3 ± 8.6 years (range: 18 to 54). The mean logMAR UCVA, BCVA, and BCLCVA were 0.85 ± 0.38 (range: 0.30–1.30), 0.47 ± 0.27 (range: 0.10–1.30), and 0.16 ± 0.20 (range: 0–1.00). There were significant increases in visual acuities with contact lenses (p<.05). BCLCVA was significantly better in oval type than globus type (p=.022). UCVA and BCLCVA were significantly better in moderate keratoconus group (p=.015,p=.018). The mean line gain in Snellen was 3.6 ± 1.8 lines (range: 0–7 lines). The mean line gain was higher in central cone group than paracentral cone group and oval group than globus group (p=.014,p=.045). The mean VAS score was 8.14 ± 1.88 (range: 6–10).Conclusions.Toris K can improve visual acuity of patients with keratoconus. Toris K is successful even in the moderate and advanced form of the disease.

Use of new-generation hybrid contact lenses for managing challenging corneas

2020 ◽  
pp. 112067212094275
Author(s):  
Ibrahim Inan Harbiyeli ◽  
Elif Erdem ◽  
Puren Isik ◽  
Meltem Yagmur ◽  
Reha Ersoz
Keyword(s):  
Visual Acuity ◽  
Medical Records ◽  
Contact Lenses ◽  
Corrected Visual Acuity ◽  
Manifest Refraction ◽  
Uncorrected Visual Acuity ◽  
The Mean ◽  
New Generation ◽  
Generation Hybrid ◽  
Irregular Astigmatism

Introduction: To evaluate the safety and efficacy of new-generation hybrid contact lenses (HCL) among patients with irregular astigmatism. Methods: Medical records of 25 patients fit with new-generation HCL (Eyebrid® and AirFlex®) were retrospectively reviewed. The data collected included etiology of irregular astigmatism, uncorrected visual acuity, manifest refraction, spectacle-corrected visual acuity (S-CDVA), steep / flat keratometric values, corneal astigmatism, records of rigid / soft CL fitted before HCL, all parameters of the trial lenses, and the final prescribed HCL parameters and HCL-CDVA. Results: The study included 34 eyes from 25 patients (nine females and 16 males) with an average age of 29 ± 13 (ranging from 8–56) years. In total, 25 eyes with keratoconus, four with post - keratoplasty astigmatism, three with irregular astigmatism due to corneal trauma and two with residual astigmatism after radial keratotomy were fit with HCL. The mean S-CDVA (logMAR) improved significantly from 0.76 ± 0.41 to 0.14 ± 0.15 with HCL ( p < 0.01). The most common indication for HCL was inability to fit with rigid gas permeable (RGP) lenses (22 eyes). The average number of lenses to successful fit was 1.4 (mode, 1; median, 1) and ideal fit was achieved with the first trial lens in 25 eyes (73%). Seven patients (nine eyes, 36%) discontinued lens use within the first 6 months because of discomfort (six eyes, 24%), ocular allergy (two eyes, 8%) and tearing of contact lens (one eye, 4%). Discussion: New-generation HCL may be a suitable option for fitting challenging corneas with irregular astigmatism that cannot be rehabilitated efficiently with rigid lenses.

scholarly journals Clinical Experience of Using Intraocular Lenses

2019 ◽  
Vol 16 (3) ◽  
pp. 304-309
Author(s):  
A. D. Chernysheva ◽  
V. O. Afanasyeva
Keyword(s):  
Visual Acuity ◽  
Postoperative Period ◽  
Early Postoperative Period ◽  
Intraocular Lenses ◽  
Corrected Visual Acuity ◽  
Uncorrected Visual Acuity ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Basic Studies ◽  
The Given ◽  
Observation Period

Aim: to analyze the data obtained from using of intraocular lenses — the hydrophobic IOL Citrin and a hydrophilic IOL Aquamarine, produced by Russian company — NanOptic. Materials and methods. A total of 56 IOLs, produced by NanOptic (38 hydrophobic IOLs Citrine and 18 hydrophilic IOLs Aquamarine) were implanted. The observation period was from 3 to 12 months. The indication for phacoemulsification was age cataract. The age of the patients was 54–85. Patients before the operation were conducted basic studies. The mean uncorrected visual acuity before the operation was (UCVA) 0.121 ± 0.120 (0.001–0.3), and the mean corrected visual acuity was (BCVA) 0.187 ± 0.140 (0.001–0.6). All patients underwent standard phacoemulsification. Results. The early postoperative period was without any complications. In the postoperative period the mean UCVA in patients with “Citrine” and “Aquamarine” was 0.90 ± 0.10 (0.7–1.0) and 0.96 ± 0.07 (0.8–1.0) accordingly, and the mean BCVA was 0.94 ± 0.07 (0.8–1.0) and 0.99 ± 0.02 (0.9–1.0) accordingly. In all cases, the refraction obtained was consistent with the prediction. The error in IOL calculation was minimal and permissible. There weren’t any case of secondary cataract in patients with hydrophobic IOLs, and 3 cases of lens posterior capsule fibrosis of 1 degree in patients with hydrophilic IOLs in 3–12 months observation. The position of IOL in capsule bag was stable. Conclusions. The results of implantation of new Russian-made IOLs on the given parameters appeared to be satisfactory, that allows to recommend them for implantation in cataract surgery.

scholarly journals Prospective Interventional Non-Comparative Non-Randomized Clinical Study of A Topical Synergic Compound to Mitigate Presbyopia Effects

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Cesar A Sanchez Galeana
Keyword(s):  
Visual Acuity ◽  
Low Dose ◽  
Pupil Diameter ◽  
Secondary Effects ◽  
Near Vision ◽  
Randomized Clinical Study ◽  
Patient Reported ◽  
Corrected Distance Visual Acuity ◽  
Near Visual Acuity ◽  
The Mean

Abstract Purpose To assess the safety and efficacy of a novel compound with low -dose pilocarpine, brimonidine and oxymetazoline (PBO) in the near vision of a group of healthy presbyopic individuals. Design Prospective, consecutive, noncomparative, nonrandomized interventional study. Subjects Twenty-six healthy presbyopic patients presented from August to September 2021 to our clinic and were willing to participate in the study. Methods PBO compound was instilled in both eyes to assess its effect in near vision one hour after instillation.Main Outcome Measures Under corrected near visual acuity using the Jaeger notation, under corrected and corrected distance visual acuity, photopic and scotopic pupil diameter was registered before and one hour after instillation of the compound. Results Baseline binocular Jaeger notation was 5.86 +/-1.39 SD range (3-9). One hour after drop instillation, binocular Jaeger was 2.53 +/ 1.71 SD range (1 – 6) (p ≤ 0.0001) Lines gained 3.30 +/-1.40 SD range (0 – 6). Mean photopic pupilar diameter was 3.69 mm +/- 0.67 SD range (2.5 – 5 mm). Mean scotopic pupilar diameter was 4.61 mm +/- 0.78 SD range (3 – 6 mm). The mean photopic pupilar diameter was 2.27 mm +/-052 SD (1.5 – 3) (p ≤ 0.000). Scotopic pupilar diameter was 2.63 mm +/-0.53 SD range (2 – 3) (p ≤ 0.000). One patient reported no improvement in near vision. (3.8%). One patient reported dim vision rated 5 in a VAS (1 –10) (3.8%). Conclusion Low-dose pilocarpine, brimonidine, and oxymetazoline showed efficacy, improving near-distance vision one hour after instillation in a group of presbyopic patients, and safety showed few and transient secondary effects.

Toric intraocular lens for correction of high corneal astigmatism in cataract patients

2020 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
pp. 83-88
Author(s):  
Irene Simo ◽  
◽  
Laura Remón ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Visual Acuity ◽  
Intraocular Lens ◽  
Medical Engineering ◽  
Toric Intraocular Lens ◽  
Toric Iol ◽  
Corrected Visual Acuity ◽  
Uncorrected Visual Acuity ◽  
Before And After ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Axis Rotation

AIM: To evaluate the efficacy of Bi-Flex toric intraocular lens (T-IOL; Medicontur, Medical Engineering, Ltd., Inc.) implantation to correct preexisting astigmatism in patients having cataract surgery. METHODS: This retrospective consecutive study included 22 eyes of 16 patients with more than 2.50 diopters (D) of corneal preexisting astigmatism having cataract. Preoperative and postoperative uncorrected visual acuity (UCVA), best corrected visual acuity (BCVA), objective and subjective refraction and keratometric and topographic cylinder were measured. Postoperative the toric IOL axis was evaluated using vector analysis. RESULTS: Postoperatively, subjective refractive cylinder was reduced significant (P<0.05) from 4.05±1.53 D to 1.35±0.86 D. The component J0 reduced in magnitude from -0.81±2.02 D to -0.12±0.62 D (P<0.05). Both, UCVA and BCVA improved significantly at 1mo after surgery (P<0.05 in both cases). After the surgery, the UCVA and BCVA were 0.24±0.19 and 0.06±0.08, respectively. The mean toric IOL axis rotation was 2.95±5.25 degree, with rotation less than 10 degrees in 86.36% of eyes. No differences in mean keratometric values obtained before and after surgery were found (P>0.05 for J0 and J45). CONCLUSION: Implantation of the Bi-Flex toric IOL is a safe and effective method to correct the preexisting regular astigmatism (greater than 2.50D).

scholarly journals Prevalence and Profile of Central Serous Chorioretinopathy in an Indian Cohort

2019 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
pp. 5-10
Author(s):  
Niroj Kumar Sahoo ◽  
Sumit Randhir Singh ◽  
Priyanka Kammari ◽  
Ganesh Babu Jonnadula ◽  
Anthony Vipin Das ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Visual Acuity ◽  
South India ◽  
Steroid Use ◽  
Shift Workers ◽  
Patient Profile ◽  
Corrected Visual Acuity ◽  
Uncorrected Visual Acuity ◽  
History Of ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Set Up

Aims: To determine the profile of CSCR patients from a tertiary health care set-up in India. Methods and Material: A total of 2780 (2447 males and 333 females) patients with a diagnosis of CSCR were included. Data regarding the demographics, profile of CSCR and systemic diseases, if any, were collected from a tertiary eye care network in South India from January 2012 to December 2016. Results: The prevalence of CSCR was found to be 1.7% (A total 2780 patients, with mean age of 42.3±10.1 years). A total of 2031 patients had a unilateral and 749 had bilateral involvement. Acute and chronic CSCR was seen in 1932 (69.5%) and 848 (30.5%) eyes respectively. The mean uncorrected visual acuity of the patients was 0.51±0.45 log MAR (Snellen equivalent 20/60) while the mean best corrected visual acuity was 0.32±0.40 log MAR (Snellen equivalent 20/40). History of smoking and steroid use was present in 214 (7.7%) and 758 (27.3%) individuals respectively. Hypertension and diabetes mellitus was present in 106 (3.8%) and 51 (1.8%) patients respectively. Most of patients {824 (29.6%) patients} were shift-workers. Laser was done in 336 (12.1%) acute and 223 (8%) chronic CSCR patients. Photodynamic therapy was used in 12 acute and 12 chronic cases. Conclusion: Prevalence of CSCR was 1.7%. The study provides an overview of patient profile among Indian subjects.

scholarly journals Kinetic visual acuity is correlated with functional visual acuity at higher speeds

2019 ◽  
Vol 4 (1) ◽  
pp. e000383
Author(s):  
Ikko Iehisa ◽  
Kazuno Negishi ◽  
Masahiko Ayaki ◽  
Kazuo Tsubota
Keyword(s):  
Visual Acuity ◽  
Visual Function ◽  
Linear Mixed Effects Model ◽  
Linear Mixed Effects ◽  
Corrected Visual Acuity ◽  
Registration Number ◽  
Functional Visual Acuity ◽  
The Mean ◽  
All Speeds ◽  
Better Than

ObjectiveTo measure the kinetic visual acuity (KVA) which is the ability to identify approaching objects and the functional visual acuity (FVA) which is continuous VA during 1 min under binocular and monocular condition (non-dominant eye shielding) for healthy subjects, and related ocular parameters to explore their correlation and implication in aspect of integrated visual function.MethodsThe mean age of the 28 participants was 38.6±8.9 years (range, 23–57 years; 6 women). A KVA metre (AS-4Fα) and FVA metre (AS-28) were used to measure KVA and FVA, respectively. Multiple regression analysis was conducted to explore correlations among the measured visual function and related parameters, including age, binocularity, best-corrected visual acuity, refraction and tear break-up time.ResultsThe results of binocular KVA were better than monocular KVA at all speeds. A strong correlation was found between monocular and binocular KVA. The results of binocular FVA were better than monocular FVA (p<0.001) and there was a correlation between monocular and binocular FVA (R=0.638, p<0.001), as well as the maintenance rate for FVA (R=0.228, p=0.003). A linear mixed-effects model revealed that binocularity for KVA prediction was significant at all speeds and FVA was also significant at 60 km/h (p<0.05).ConclusionThe current results suggest that both binocularity and FVA may contribute to KVA.Trial registration numberUMIN00032385

scholarly journals Effects of V4c-ICL Implantation on Myopic Patients’ Vision-Related Daily Activities

2016 ◽  
Vol 2016 ◽  
pp. 1-6 ◽  
Author(s):  
Taixiang Liu ◽  
Shaorong Linghu ◽  
Le Pan ◽  
Rong Shi
Keyword(s):  
Visual Acuity ◽  
Daily Activities ◽  
Central Hole ◽  
Spherical Equivalent ◽  
Implantable Collamer Lens ◽  
Corrected Visual Acuity ◽  
Uncorrected Visual Acuity ◽  
New Type ◽  
Best Corrected Visual Acuity ◽  
Better Than

The new type implantable Collamer lens with a central hole (V4c-ICL) is widely used to treat myopia. However, halos occur in some patients after surgery. The aim is to evaluate the effect of V4c-ICL implantation on vision-related daily activities. This retrospective study included 42 patients. Uncorrected visual acuity (UCVA), best corrected visual acuity (BCVA), intraocular pressure (IOP), endothelial cell density (ECD), and vault were recorded and vision-related daily activities were evaluated at 3 months after operation. The average spherical equivalent was-0.12±0.33 D at 3 months after operation. UCVA equal to or better than preoperative BCVA occurred in 98% of eyes. The average BCVA at 3 months after operation was-0.03±0.07LogMAR, which was significantly better than preoperative BCVA (0.08±0.10LogMAR) (P=0.029). Apart from one patient (2.4%) who had difficulty reading computer screens, all patients had satisfactory or very satisfactory results. During the early postoperation, halos occurred in 23 patients (54.8%). However there were no significant differences in the scores of visual functions between patients with and without halos (P>0.05). Patients were very satisfied with their vision-related daily activities at 3 months after operation. The central hole of V4c-ICL does not affect patients’ vision-related daily activities.

scholarly journals Short-term Comparison of Refractive Errors between Two Different Age Groups after LASEK for Moderate Myopia

2021 ◽  
Vol 62 (11) ◽  
pp. 1478-1482
Author(s):  
Mi Jeong Kim ◽  
Ji Seon An ◽  
Ja Yoon Moon ◽  
Hee Young Kim ◽  
Jin Seok Choi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Visual Acuity ◽  
Age Groups ◽  
Refractive Errors ◽  
Age Group ◽  
Short Term ◽  
Corrected Visual Acuity ◽  
Group I ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Group Ii

Purpose: To investigate the safety of laser epithelial keratomileusis (LASEK) by drawing a comparison between two groups divided according to age (18-19 vs. 20-21 years old).Methods: The study was conducted as a retrospective analysis including 339 patients (678 eyes) who underwent LASEK between January 2017 and April 2020. Patients were divided by age group, group I (18-19 years old) and group II (20-21 years old). The objectives of the study included determination of visual acuity and refractive errors before and at 1, 3, and 6 months after the procedure.Results: The preoperative mean spherical equivalents (SEs) were -4.73 ± 0.88 diopters (D) in group I and -4.58 ± 0.87 D in group II (p = 0.34). At 1 month postoperatively, mean SEs were 0.32 ± 0.46 D in group I and 0.26 ± 0.59 D in group II (p = 0.18). At 3 months postoperatively, the mean SEs were 0.30 ± 0.47 D in group I and 0.28 ± 0.50 D in group II (p = 0.67). At 6 months postoperatively, the mean SEs were 0.15 ± 0.47 D in group I and 0.14 ± 0.50 D in group II (p = 0.89). There were no significant differences in postoperative best corrected visual acuity between group I and group II at 1, 3, or 6 months (p = 0.20, p = 0.13, and p = 0.11, respectively).Conclusions: There were no significant differences in postoperative mean SE or safety of LASEK between moderate myopia patients 18-19 years old and those 20-21 years old.

scholarly journals Distance Visual Acuity Versus Near Visual Acuity in Amblyopia.

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
masoumeh ahadi ◽  
Afsaneh Ebrahimi ◽  
Shahrokh Ramin
Keyword(s):  
Visual Acuity ◽  
Spherical Equivalent ◽  
Significant Relation ◽  
Distance Visual Acuity ◽  
Snellen Chart ◽  
History Of ◽  
Near Visual Acuity ◽  
The Mean ◽  
The Difference ◽  
Better Than

Abstract Purpose: To measure and compare distance and near visual acuity in amblyopic patients.Methods: This study was evaluated 167 patients with amblyopia between ages of 6 and 55 years. In all subjects, a comprehensive ophthalmic examination including visual acuity, refraction, slit lamp biomicroscopy, and funduscopy was performed. Distance visual acuity (DVA) was measured by Snellen chart at 4 m and near visual acuity (NVA) was measured by Snellen chart at 40 cm, and then DVA and NVA were compered and analyzed.Results:In our subjects, the mean distance and near visual acuity was 0.39± 0.30 log MAR and 0.30± 0.32 log MAR respectively. The mean NVA was 0.12±0.12 log MAR better than DVA and difference between them was statistically significant (P<0.001). In 40% of patients, there were no difference between DVA and NVA, and in 60% of them, NVA was 0.1 or more log MAR better than DVA. The difference between DVA and NVA was not significantly related with age (p=0.225), spherical equivalent (P=.820) and strabismus (P=.336) and type of amblyopia (P=.405). Although all of these subjects had subnormal DVA, but 43 subjects (26%) had normal NVA. In mild and moderate amblyopic groups, difference between DVA and NVA was 0.14±0.10 log MAR and 0.15±0.14 log MAR respectively, but in severe amblyopic group it was 0.03±0.08 log MAR. The difference between DVA and NVA showed a significant relation with severity of amblyopia (P<0.001). The difference between DVA and NVA was 0.16±0.11 log MAR in patients with history of amblyopia therapy and 0.07.± 0.11 log MAR in patients without treatment. This difference was statistically significant (P<0.001).Conclusion: Our results showed that near visual acuity in amblyopia especially in mild to moderate types was significantly better than distance visual acuity. More than 50% of subjects with mild amblyopia had normal near visual acuity. The difference between DVA and NVA showed no relation with age, spherical equivalent, strabismus, and type of amblyopia. Also, difference between the DVA and NVA in patients with history of amblyopia therapy was better than of it in non-treated subjects.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document