scholarly journals Mimicking General Relativity with Newtonian Dynamics

2012 ◽  
Vol 2012 ◽  
pp. 1-15
Author(s):  
E. Goulart
Keyword(s):  
General Relativity ◽  
Gravitational Field ◽  
Newtonian Mechanics ◽  
Einstein Theory ◽  
Point Particles ◽  
Mechanical Analogy ◽  
Newtonian Dynamics ◽  
Alternative Description

The aim of this paper is twofolded. (1) Showing that Newtonian mechanics of point particles in static potentials admits an alternative description in terms of effective riemannian spacetimes. (2) Using the above geometrization scheme to investigate aspects of the gravitational field as it appears in the Einstein theory. It is shown that the mechanical (3 + 1) effective metrics are quite similar to Gordon's metric, as it is suggested by the well-known optical-mechanical analogy. Some special potentials are worked out.

The post-Newtonian approximation

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nathalie Deruelle ◽  
Jean-Philippe Uzan
Keyword(s):  
General Relativity ◽  
Gravitational Field ◽  
Body Problem ◽  
Equations Of Motion ◽  
Two Body Problem ◽  
Newtonian Approximation ◽  
Actual Motion ◽  
Law Of Attraction ◽  
Universal Law ◽  
Two Bodies

This chapter embarks on a study of the two-body problem in general relativity. In other words, it seeks to describe the motion of two compact, self-gravitating bodies which are far-separated and moving slowly. It limits the discussion to corrections proportional to v2 ~ m/R, the so-called post-Newtonian or 1PN corrections to Newton’s universal law of attraction. The chapter first examines the gravitational field, that is, the metric, created by the two bodies. It then derives the equations of motion, and finally the actual motion, that is, the post-Keplerian trajectories, which generalize the post-Keplerian geodesics obtained earlier in the chapter.

The Permanent Gravitational Field in the Einstein Theory

1920 ◽  
Vol 22 (2) ◽  
pp. 86
Author(s):  
Luther Pfahler Eisenhart
Keyword(s):  
Gravitational Field ◽  
Einstein Theory

On the optical-mechanical analogy in general relativity

2011 ◽  
Vol 17 (2) ◽  
pp. 143-146
Author(s):  
M. M. Abdil’din ◽  
M. E. Abishev ◽  
N. A. Beissen ◽  
A. S. Taukenova
Keyword(s):  
General Relativity ◽  
Mechanical Analogy

The precise calculations of the constant terms in the equations of motions of planets and photons of general relativity

2021 ◽  
Vol 34 (2) ◽  
pp. 183-192
Author(s):  
Mei Xiaochun
Keyword(s):  
General Relativity ◽  
Gravitational Field ◽  
Deflection Angle ◽  
Constant Term ◽  
Equation Of Motion ◽  
Time Dependent ◽  
Newtonian Gravity ◽  
Newtonian Theory ◽  
The Deflection Angle ◽  
Equations Of Motions

In general relativity, the values of constant terms in the equations of motions of planets and light have not been seriously discussed. Based on the Schwarzschild metric and the geodesic equations of the Riemann geometry, it is proved in this paper that the constant term in the time-dependent equation of motion of planet in general relativity must be equal to zero. Otherwise, when the correction term of general relativity is ignored, the resulting Newtonian gravity formula would change its basic form. Due to the absence of this constant term, the equation of motion cannot describe the elliptical and the hyperbolic orbital motions of celestial bodies in the solar gravitational field. It can only describe the parabolic orbital motion (with minor corrections). Therefore, it becomes meaningless to use general relativity calculating the precession of Mercury's perihelion. It is also proved that the time-dependent orbital equation of light in general relativity is contradictory to the time-independent equation of light. Using the time-independent orbital equation to do calculation, the deflection angle of light in the solar gravitational field is <mml:math display="inline"> <mml:mrow> <mml:mn>1.7</mml:mn> <mml:msup> <mml:mn>5</mml:mn> <mml:mo>″</mml:mo> </mml:msup> </mml:mrow> </mml:math> . But using the time-dependent equation to do calculation, the deflection angle of light is only a small correction of the prediction value <mml:math display="inline"> <mml:mrow> <mml:mn>0.87</mml:mn> <mml:msup> <mml:mn>5</mml:mn> <mml:mo>″</mml:mo> </mml:msup> </mml:mrow> </mml:math> of the Newtonian gravity theory with a magnitude order of <mml:math display="inline"> <mml:mrow> <mml:msup> <mml:mrow> <mml:mn>10</mml:mn> </mml:mrow> <mml:mrow> <mml:mo>−</mml:mo> <mml:mn>5</mml:mn> </mml:mrow> </mml:msup> </mml:mrow> </mml:math> . The reason causing this inconsistency was the Einstein's assumption that the motion of light satisfied the condition <mml:math display="inline"> <mml:mrow> <mml:mi>d</mml:mi> <mml:mi>s</mml:mi> <mml:mo>=</mml:mo> <mml:mn>0</mml:mn> </mml:mrow> </mml:math> in gravitational field. It leads to the absence of constant term in the time-independent equation of motion of light and destroys the uniqueness of geodesic in curved space-time. Meanwhile, light is subjected to repulsive forces in the gravitational field, rather than attractive forces. The direction of deflection of light is opposite, inconsistent with the predictions of present general relativity and the Newtonian theory of gravity. Observing on the earth surface, the wavelength of light emitted by the sun is violet shifted. This prediction is obviously not true. Practical observation is red shift. Finally, the practical significance of the calculation of the Mercury perihelion's precession and the existing problems of the light's deflection experiments of general relativity are briefly discussed. The conclusion of this paper is that general relativity cannot have consistence with the Newtonian theory of gravity for the descriptions of motions of planets and light in the solar system. The theory itself is not self-consistent too.

All classical predictions of general relativity from special relativistic Hamiltonian dynamics

2018 ◽  
Vol 33 (29) ◽  
pp. 1850169
Author(s):  
J. H. Field
Keyword(s):  
General Relativity ◽  
Euclidean Space ◽  
Hamiltonian Dynamics ◽  
Gravitational Redshift ◽  
Newtonian Mechanics ◽  
Light Deflection ◽  
Schwarzschild Metric ◽  
Related Literature ◽  
General Relativistic ◽  
Relativistic Hamiltonian Dynamics

Previous special relativistic calculations of gravitational redshift, light deflection and Shapiro delay are extended to include perigee advance. The three classical, order G, post-Newtonian predictions of general relativity as well as general relativistic light-speed-variation are therefore shown to be also consequences of special relativistic Newtonian mechanics in Euclidean space. The calculations are compared to general relativistic ones based on the Schwarzschild metric equation, and related literature is critically reviewed.

General Relativity: An Introduction to the Theory of the Gravitational Field

1984 ◽  
Vol 52 (5) ◽  
pp. 478-479
Author(s):  
Hans Stephani ◽  
Jeffrey M. Bowen
Keyword(s):  
General Relativity ◽  
Gravitational Field

scholarly journals Foundations of a Theory of Gravity with a Constraint and Its Canonical Quantization

2021 ◽  
Vol 52 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Alexander P. Sobolev
Keyword(s):  
General Relativity ◽  
Gravitational Field ◽  
Early Universe ◽  
Canonical Quantization ◽  
Entropy Density ◽  
Maximum Temperature ◽  
Past Century ◽  
Physical Point ◽  
Theory Of Gravity ◽  
The Universe

AbstractThe gravitational equations were derived in general relativity (GR) using the assumption of their covariance relative to arbitrary transformations of coordinates. It has been repeatedly expressed an opinion over the past century that such equality of all coordinate systems may not correspond to reality. Nevertheless, no actual verification of the necessity of this assumption has been made to date. The paper proposes a theory of gravity with a constraint, the degenerate variants of which are general relativity (GR) and the unimodular theory of gravity. This constraint is interpreted from a physical point of view as a sufficient condition for the adiabaticity of the process of the evolution of the space–time metric. The original equations of the theory of gravity with the constraint are formulated. On this basis, a unified model of the evolution of the modern, early, and very early Universe is constructed that is consistent with the observational astronomical data but does not require the hypotheses of the existence of dark energy, dark matter or inflatons. It is claimed that: physical time is anisotropic, the gravitational field is the main source of energy of the Universe, the maximum global energy density in the Universe was 64 orders of magnitude smaller the Planckian one, and the entropy density is 18 orders of magnitude higher the value predicted by GR. The value of the relative density of neutrinos at the present time and the maximum temperature of matter in the early Universe are calculated. The wave equation of the gravitational field is formulated, its solution is found, and the nonstationary wave function of the very early Universe is constructed. It is shown that the birth of the Universe was random.

scholarly journals WAVELESS APPROXIMATION THEORIES OF GRAVITY

2008 ◽  
Vol 17 (02) ◽  
pp. 265-273 ◽  
Author(s):  
JAMES A. ISENBERG
Keyword(s):  
Gravitational Field ◽  
Gravitational Radiation ◽  
Elliptic Equations ◽  
Degrees Of Freedom ◽  
Dynamic Instability ◽  
Accurate Approximation ◽  
Time Step ◽  
Einstein Theory ◽  
Physical Systems ◽  
Theories Of Gravity

The analysis of a general multibody physical system governed by Einstein's equations is quite difficult, even if numerical methods (on a computer) are used. Some of the difficulties — many coupled degrees of freedom, dynamic instability — are associated with the presence of gravitational waves. We have developed a number of "waveless approximation theories" (WAT's) which repress the gravitational radiation and thereby simplify the analysis. The matter, according to these theories, evolves dynamically. The gravitational field, however, is determined at each time step by a set of elliptic equations with matter sources. There is reason to believe that for many physical systems, the WAT-generated system evolution is a very accurate approximation to that generated by the full Einstein theory.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document